Scientists tell why living beings unite for mutual benefits

Researchers used bacteria to study the evolution of mutual cooperation

bees shutterstock Bees and flowering plants have evolved mutual cooperation that complement each other. Pollination by bees is far more reliable than trusting on the wind. | Shutterstock

Organisms better adapted to their environment—usually by fierce competition and not cooperation—tend to survive. But in nature, we often find that organisms support each other in order to gain an advantage. However, this kind of cooperation contradicts the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin: Why would organisms invest valuable resources to help others? Instead, they should rather use them for themselves, in order to win the evolutionary competition with other species.

A new study published in the scientific journal Current Biology has now solved this puzzle.

The research project, performed in collaboration with the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena in Germany, was led by Prof. Christian Kost from the Department of Ecology at the Osnabrueck University.

Interactions between two or more organisms, in which all partners involved gain an advantage, are ubiquitous in nature and have played a key role in the evolution of life on Earth. For example, root bacteria fix nitrogen from the atmosphere, thus making it available to plants. In return, the plant supplies its root bacteria with nutritious sugars. However, it is nevertheless costly for both interaction partners to support each other. For example, the provision of sugar requires energy, which is then not available to the plant anymore. From this, results the risk of cheating interaction partners that consume the sugar without providing nitrogen in return.

The research team used bacteria as a model system to study the evolution of mutual cooperation. At the beginning of the experiment, two bacterial strains could only grow when they provided each other with essential amino acids. Over the course of several generations, however, the initial exchange of metabolic by-products developed into a real cooperation: Both partners increased the production of the exchanged amino acids in order to benefit their respective partner. Even though the increased amino acid production enhanced growth when both partners were present, it was extremely costly when individual bacterial strains had to grow without their partner.

The observed changes were caused by the fact that individual bacterial cells had assembled into multicellular clusters. In these cell groups, cooperative mutants were rewarded. The more resources they invested in the growth of other cells, the more nutrients they received in return from their partners.

"This kind of feedback represents a previously unknown mechanism, which promotes the evolution of cooperative interactions between two different organisms," says Kost. Although the study was performed with bacteria in a test tube, the mechanism discovered can most likely explain the evolution of cooperation in many different ecological interactions.