The Associated Journals Ltd (AJL) case is truly a very weird case of alleged money laundering on which summons were issued to our leaders. It is a case where in fact there is no money involved. It is a classic case of political vendetta and pettiness.
The CBI case or the investigative process began with Dr Subramanian Swamy, a well-known baiter of the Congress, in 2014-15. The Enforcement Directorate had not thought it fit till now to summon Congress president Sonia Gandhi or former Congress president Rahul Gandhi. Now, on exactly the same alleged acts and omissions, the ED went ahead and issued summons to them.
What makes it a strange case of alleged money laundering where no money is involved? AJL is a venerable old company that has been in existence for decades and carries the great flag of National Herald. It has always stood for a set of values, but did not succeed commercially. It was thus burdened by financial problems. The Congress, in sync with the values that AJL stood for, provided financial support—around Rs90 crore—to it over a period of time. AJL was thus a company with debt. This debt was converted into equity, which is an established practice in corporate activity in India and abroad.
- Satyendar Jain's arrest before Himachal polls too much of a coincidence: Sanjay Singh
- Interrogating Chidambaram was a challenge, says former ED joint director
- How dirty politics ruined Maharashtra's cooperative sugar mills
- ED allegation will not stand in court: Balasaheb Patil
- PMLA is contrary to tenets of criminal jurisprudence: Kapil Sibal
- Who is afraid of the Enforcement Directorate?
The debt of Rs90 crore, converted into equity, was assigned to a new company called Young Indian, the result being that AJL became free from debt. Young Indian was formed under Section 25 of the Companies Act, which means that it is a not-for-profit company. It cannot pay dividends to its shareholders and directors.
The other important fact is that Young Indian may have started holding shares, but AJL remains just the same. AJL continues to hold all the profiting it earlier held. It continues to be the owner of National Herald. It continues to be the printer and publisher. The only change is with regard to the shareholding of AJL. So when AJL continues to be an independent entity and there is no transfer of property or money, how can a charge of money laundering be made?
The case had been closed in 2015. But this malafide government sacked the head of the ED at that time. They are trying to reopen the case seven years later and have summoned the Congress president and the former Congress president.
The government is attacking every political party, driven by a sense of vendetta. This will ultimately be the undoing of the ruling party. On our part, we will not be intimidated by such political pettiness.
A senior advocate, Singhvi is a Congress leader and Rajya Sabha member.
—As told to Soni Mishra