For the first time in history, Mexicans will vote Sunday on whether their president should finish out the rest of his term.
It has been a bizarre journey to this vote. For one thing, President Andrs Manuel Lopez Obrador himself demanded it. The president got angry when electoral officials set up a limited number of polling places to save money.
Second, there's little chance that the required minimum of 40 per cent of voters almost 40 million will show up to make the referendum valid.
And third, there's little chance Lopez Obrador could lose, with current approval ratings of around 60 per cent.
So why is Mexico going through with the vote, which will cost almost $80 million?
Analysts say Lopez Obrador wanted the recall to mobilize and energize his supporters; he is a president who has been constantly on the campaign trail since 2005, and he depicts his administration as a twilight battle to defeat conservatives.
So he is hoping the get-out-the-vote effort will shore up his party in state elections this year, with a possible spill-over effect for the 2024 presidential race. The ballot asks whether Lopez Obrador should continue as president or be replaced.
While some opposition groups have called on people to boycott the vote, some opponents want to actually try to win, and say people should turn out and vote to recall the president.
Martn Meneses, 58, a formal postal worker, says such a vote is important, so the president can see that the people are waking up from their slumber.
Like many opponents, Meneses sees Lpez Obrador's highly personalistic, charismatic style as weakening democracy. The president has bridled at criticism, verbally attacked journalists, lashed out at judges whose rulings he disagrees with and has done away with niceties like environmental impact statements for his pet building projects.
Meneses sees the vote as another, expensive play by Lopez Obrador to put himself at center stage. Referring to the government's failure to buy enough medicine for childhood cancer treatments, Meneses objected to stratospheric costs to hold a vote, when children with cancer don't have medicine.
The president's supporters see the vote as equally vital.
Mara Hernndez, a 70-year-old homemaker in Mexico City's rough Colonia Obrera neighborhood, is all too conscious of the old-age stipend of about $75 per month instituted by Lopez Obrador.
In good times and bad, we have to stick with him, because if he isn't here, they'll take away the benefits we have, said Hernndez. They can't recall the guy who has helped us.
Abel Medina, 40, who owns a small tortilla ship in Mexico City's historic downtown, said the vote will be worth it, to give legitimacy to the president.
Now we have a good president, not like those of the past who dug us into a whole by selling off state-owned companies, Medina said. That's why we ant him to continue.
If its unlikely to have any real effect, what's the harm in holding a vote, apart from the money spent?
Rubn Salazar, director of the Etellekt Consulting firm, said there were dangers in the way Lopez Obrador's administration has been trying to whip up enthusiasm for the vote; the president's previous referendums have drawn sparse turnout.
The government's own propaganda apparatus has carried out a very intense campaign, using public money, Salazar said, noting those who receive social benefits program have been pressured to vote.
That remains a concern; Mexico was ruled for seven decades by the old Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, whch routinely traded hand-out programs in exchange for votes.
