The Supreme Court will on Wednesday pronounce its verdict on the preliminary objections raised by the Narendra Modi government that the documents on which it was claiming "privilege" cannot be relied upon to re-examine the verdict in the Rafale fighter jet deal with France.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi will pronounce the verdict.
On March 14, the Supreme Court had reserved its verdict on the preliminary objections raised by the Modi government on the admissibility of privileged documents annexed by former Union ministers Yashwant Sinha and Arun Shourie as also activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan in their review petition against the top court's December 14 judgement that dismissed all petitions against the Rafale jet deal.
"Only after we decide the preliminary objection raised by the Centre, we will go into other aspects of the review petitions," the bench said, adding that "only if we overrule the preliminary objection, we will go into other details".
The Modi government had claimed privilege over documents pertaining to the Rafale fighter jet deal with France and said those documents cannot be considered in evidence as per Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, appearing for the Centre, had contended that no one can produce these documents in the court without the permission of the department concerned as those documents are also protected under the Official Secrets Act and their disclosure is exempted under the Right to Information Act as per Section 8(1)(a).
The Supreme Court had further noted that, according to the AG's submissions, "there are three Rafale documents whose publication comes under Official Secrets Act, 1923. These documents were unauthorisedly published. You claim privilege under Section 123 of Evidence Act. You want us to adjudicate and strike down the review on this basis".
Bhushan had submitted a note, countering the preliminary objections raised by the Modi government on maintainability of the review petitions, stating that "preliminary objections are mala fide and totally untenable arguments".
He had said the Modi government cannot claim privilege over the documents, which are already published and are in public domain.
Bhushan had said that Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act only protected "unpublished documents".
While the Modi government was making its submission that the documents can be withheld from disclosure under the RTI Act in view of national security, the Supreme Court said Section 22 of the RTI Act gave it an overriding effect over the Official Secrets Act.
It also said that under Section 24 of the RTI Act, even security and intelligence establishments are not exempted from disclosing information in relation to corruption and human rights violations.
"The RTI Act brought a revolution. In 2009, your own government said file notings can be made available under the RTI. Let us not go back now," the Supreme Court bench has said.
Bhushan further said that provisions of the RTI Act say public interest outweighs other things and no privilege can be claimed except for documents that pertain to intelligence agencies.
also read
- 'Don't try to bring down the system like this': SC pans EVM critics
- ‘Attempts to undermine judiciary’: Retired judges write to CJI
- After HC dismisses his plea against arrest, Kejriwal to move Supreme Court today
- ‘Misconstrued the Act’: SC stays Allahabad HC’s order striking down UP madrasa law
- Supreme Court grants bail to AAP's Sanjay Singh in Delhi liquor policy case
He also said that there is no government-to-government contract in purchasing the Rafale jets as there is no sovereign guarantee extended to India by France in the Rs 58,000 crore deal.
He had submitted why the Modi government didn't lodge any FIR when these documents started coming out in November 2018.
He had further said that the Modi government has itself filed a detailed CAG report regarding as many as 10 defence purchases and it is untenable on their part to now claim privilege.
