Another tsunami could strike Indonesia, experts have warned, after a powerful wave caused by a volcanic eruption killed hundreds when it swallowed coastal settlements, taking earthquake-focused disaster monitors by surprise.
While tsunamis are often triggered by earthquakes, in this case experts believe the deadly waves were generated by an eruption of the Anak (or "child of") Krakatoa volcano, which could have caused a large undersea landslide or flow of molten rock into the water.
The tsunami "appears to have been caused by an underwater collapse" of part of the volcano, said David Rothery, a professor of planetary geosciences at Britain's Open University.
also read
- IN PICS | Tsunami alert issued at Mount Ruang: Latest from Indonesia's North Sulawesi
- Indonesian voters choose a new president in one of the world's largest elections
- VIDEO: Footballer dies after being hit by lightning
- Indonesians join final campaign events before presidential election
- Indonesia: Mount Marapi volcano eruption leaves 22 dead
Anak Krakatoa is an island that emerged around 1928 in the crater left by Krakatoa, whose massive 1883 eruption killed at least 36,000 people.
The tsunami that struck on Saturday was the third natural disaster to hit Indonesia in six months. The toll is feared to be around 400.
The country has 127 active volcanoes and lies on the Pacific Ocean's "Ring of Fire" where earthquakes and volcanic eruptions are frequent.
Anak Krakatoa, located in the Sunda Strait between Java and Sumatra islands, is close to densely populated areas.
The volcano has been particularly active since June, noted Jacques-Marie Bardintzeff at the University of Paris-South.
"We were helpless given how sudden the event took place,” Bardintzeff said.
"The time between cause and effect was a few dozen minutes, which was too short to warn the population."
The killer wave struck at night, sweeping across tourist beaches and low-lying settlements on both sides of the Sunda Strait and catching both residents and disaster monitors totally unawares.
"Signs that a tsunami was coming weren't detected and so people did not have time to evacuate," said Indonesia's disaster agency spokesman Sutopo Purwo Nugroho, who blamed vandalism, technical problems and limited budgets for the lack of warning buoys.
But the Open University's Rothry said such buoys, normally positioned to monitor earthquakes at underwater tectonic plate boundaries, would still have had limited efficacy.
"Even if there had been such a buoy right next to Anak Krakatoa, this is so close to the affected shorelines that warning time would have been minimal given the high speeds at which tsunami waves travel." Simon Boxall of Southampton University said the region was in spring tide, "and it would appear that the wave hit some of the coastal areas at the highest point of this high tide, exacerbating the damage done".
While the tsunami was relatively small, Richard Teeuw, a disaster risk reduction expert at the University of Portsmouth in England said: "Such waves—laden with debris—can be deadly for coastal communities, especially if there is no warning."
Could more tsunamis be coming?
