The fight for accountability: What's next for the CJP and India's youth movement?
While the immediate agitation has been called off, the movement, led by the CJP, has created a new model for public dissent and left a lasting sentiment for greater government accountability
Gen Z's powerful social media-driven protests have forced government acknowledgment and highlighted ongoing public dissatisfaction with policies, signaling a new era of youth activism focused on accountability, with opposition parties leveraging the momentum for parliamentary questioning and the organizing CJP maintaining its vigil.
Gen Z's powerful social media-driven protests have forced government acknowledgment and highlighted ongoing public dissatisfaction with policies, signaling a new era of youth activism focused on accountability, with opposition parties leveraging the momentum for parliamentary questioning and the organizing CJP maintaining its vigil.
Gen Z's powerful social media-driven protests have forced government acknowledgment and highlighted ongoing public dissatisfaction with policies, signaling a new era of youth activism focused on accountability, with opposition parties leveraging the momentum for parliamentary questioning and the organizing CJP maintaining its vigil.
It was perhaps for the first time that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had to record an Instagram reel and put it out in response to a hybrid protest unfolding both on the streets and on social media. The composition of this protest was largely Gen Z. While the protest may have been called off for now, the sentiment against policies that many consider flawed, and against those responsible for them, remains.
Shaina Singh, who was celebrating after Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation at the protest site, tells THE WEEK that she is happy with the resignation and would be even happier if the protests continue and the government is held accountable on several other issues. The same sentiment was echoed by an overwhelming majority of the celebrating crowd.
According to analysts, the protest has opened a window for people to express their dissent. The movement brought together celebrities and ordinary citizens who rallied behind the cause and publicly voiced criticism of the government. Political analyst Madan Mohan Jha believes that while the protest may have been called off, there remains a multitude of issues that continue to generate public dissatisfaction. The movement, he says, has shown people a model of protest that could be replicated in the future if public pressure builds.
Having concluded its agitation, the CJP has also tried to position itself as a shadow force in recent days, signalling that it will not completely withdraw from the scene and will continue to monitor whether its demands are met in full.
Although the Opposition's momentum in putting pressure on the government has lost some intensity after the the protest ended, the principal Opposition party, Congress, has continued to raise the issue in Parliament. It has demanded answers from the government, particularly the home ministry, on how, why and by whose authorisation pellet guns and other crowd-control measures were used against peaceful students.
There are also competing narratives about the CJP's future. However, the party's leaders maintain that it emerged as a force to seek accountability from a government where, they argue, such accountability had been missing in recent years. Brijesh, who attended the final day of the protest with his friends, says they will continue to support any movement that seeks accountability from the government, arguing that this is just one issue among many that still need to be addressed.
After its massive success, all eyes will now be on the CJP's next major move. As Dipke recently said, the party will deliberate on its next course of action and make it known in due course. Moreover, only one of its demands has been accepted outright, while the other two are still in process. The CJP leaders have urged the government to fulfil the remaining demands. It remains to be seen how these two demands are addressed by the government.
The CJP was founded primarily to focus on student issues, though there are demands from different quarters for it to take up issues such as ethanol blending and others. However, observers suggest that the CJP may remain focused on youth-related issues rather than adopt a broader ideological stance against the government.