Donald Trump’s defence rests in former president’s New York hush money trial

Closing arguments likely to be on May 28

Trump Hush Money trial Donald Trump | Reuters

Donald Trump's lawyers rested their defence Monday in the former president's New York hush money trial, bringing the case one step closer to final arguments.

The prosecution will get a chance to call rebuttal witnesses now that the defence witnesses have had their turn on the stand. The judge has said he expects closing arguments to happen on May 28, the Tuesday after Memorial Day.

After more than four weeks of testimony, jurors could begin deliberating as soon as next week to decide whether Trump is guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Prosecutors have accused Trump of a scheme to bury negative stories to fend off damage to his 2016 presidential campaign and then falsifying internal business records to cover it up.

Trump, the first former American president to be tried criminally, has pleaded not guilty and denied any wrongdoing in the case, which he has slammed as politically motivated.

Earlier, a defence witness in the hush money case whom the judge threatened to remove from the trial over his behaviour returned to the stand Tuesday as the trial nears its end.

Trump's lawyers hope Robert Costello's testimony will help undermine the credibility of a key prosecution witness, Trump fixer-turned-foe Michael Cohen.

Costello turned to Judge Juan M Merchan before the jurors arrived to the court, speaking quietly. The judge acknowledged him and nodded, a much more cordial scene than the drama that unfolded during Monday's proceedings, when Costello made comments under his breath during testimony, rolled his eyes and called the whole exercise ridiculous."

The antics angered Merchan, and the judge briefly kicked reporters out of the courtroom to admonish him.

The judge told Costello, a former federal prosecutor, he was being contemptuous," adding, If you try to stare me down one more time, I will remove you from the stand," according to a court transcript.

The defence's resting its case will clear the way for the trial to move on to decisions about how to instruct the jury on deliberations.

Prosecutors on Monday rested their case accusing Trump of falsifying business records as part of a scheme to bury stories that he feared could hurt his 2016 campaign. The criminal trial, the first of a former US president, is in the final stretch.

The charges stem from internal Trump Organization records in which payments to Cohen were marked as legal expenses. Prosecutors say they were really reimbursements for a USD 1,30,000 hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels to keep her from going public before the 2016 election with claims of a sexual encounter with Trump.

Trump says nothing sexual happened between them.

Trump, a Republican, has said he did nothing illegal and has slammed the case as an effort to hinder his 2024 bid to reclaim the White House.

They have no case, Trump said outside the courtroom Tuesday. There's no crime.

After jurors left for the day Monday, defence attorneys pressed the judge to throw out the charges before jurors even begin deliberating, arguing prosecutors have failed to prove their case. The defence has suggested that Trump was trying to protect his family, not his campaign, by squelching what he says were false, scurrilous claims.

Defence attorney Todd Blanche argued that there was nothing illegal about soliciting a tabloid's help to run positive stories about Trump, run negative stories about his opponents and identify potentially damaging stories before they were published. No one involved had any criminal intent, Blanche said.

"How is keeping a false story from the voters criminal? Blanche asked.

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo shot back that the trial evidence overwhelmingly supports each element of the alleged offences and said the case should proceed to the jury.

The judge didn't immediately rule on the defence's request. Such long-shot requests are often made in criminal cases but are rarely granted.

The defence called Costello because of his role as an antagonist to Cohen since their professional relationship splintered in spectacular fashion. Costello had offered to represent Cohen soon after the lawyer's hotel room, office and home were raided and as Cohen faced a decision about whether to remain defiant in the face of a criminal investigation or to cooperate with authorities in hopes of securing more lenient treatment.

Costello in the years since has repeatedly maligned Cohen's credibility and was even a witness before last year's grand jury that indicted Trump, offering testimony designed to undermine Cohen's account.

In a Fox News Channel interview last week, Costello accused Cohen of lying to the jury and using the case to monetize himself.

Costello contradicted Cohen's testimony describing Trump as intimately involved in all aspects of the hush money scheme. Costello told jurors Monday that Cohen told him Trump knew nothing about the hush money payment to Daniels.

Michael Cohen said numerous times that President Trump knew nothing about those payments, that he did this on his own, and he repeated that numerous times, Costello testified.

Cohen, however, testified earlier Monday that he has no doubt that Trump gave him a final sign-off to make the payments to Daniels. In total, he said he spoke with Trump more than 20 times about the matter in October 2016.

Trump lawyer Emil Bove told the judge that the defence does not plan to call any other witnesses after Costello, though it may still call campaign-finance expert Bradley A Smith for limited testimony.

It has not said definitively that Trump won't testify, but that's the clearest indication yet that he will waive his right to take the stand in his own defence. 

Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp