The proposed Karnataka Regulation of Use of Government Premises and Public Property Bill, 2026 has sparked a political dispute between the ruling Congress and the BJP, with the latter claiming it is an attempt to curb the activities of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). The bill aims to regulate the use of government premises and public property by various entities, requiring prior written permission for organized activities and stipulating stringent punishments for violations, including imprisonment and fines.

The proposed Karnataka Regulation of Use of Government Premises and Public Property Bill, 2026 has sparked a political dispute between the ruling Congress and the BJP, with the latter claiming it is an attempt to curb the activities of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). The bill aims to regulate the use of government premises and public property by various entities, requiring prior written permission for organized activities and stipulating stringent punishments for violations, including imprisonment and fines.

The proposed Karnataka Regulation of Use of Government Premises and Public Property Bill, 2026 has sparked a political dispute between the ruling Congress and the BJP, with the latter claiming it is an attempt to curb the activities of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). The bill aims to regulate the use of government premises and public property by various entities, requiring prior written permission for organized activities and stipulating stringent punishments for violations, including imprisonment and fines.

The Karnataka government is set to introduce legislation to regulate the use of government premises and public property during the ongoing monsoon session of the state legislature.

The proposed law has already triggered a political confrontation between the ruling Congress and the BJP, with BJP leaders from the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) background alleging that it is aimed at curbing the organisation’s activities.

The Karnataka Regulation of Use of Government Premises and Public Property Bill, 2026, was cleared by the state Cabinet on Thursday and is likely to be introduced during the ongoing session.

The government has maintained that the legislation is aimed at regulating the use of public assets and preventing their unauthorised use, rather than targeting any particular organisation.

The Bill proposes to regulate the use of government premises and public property by private individuals, organisations, associations, societies and other groups. The properties covered include land, buildings, structures, roads, parks, playgrounds, water bodies and other immovable property belonging to or controlled by the government.

What does the Bill say?

The proposed law requires seven days’ prior written permission from the deputy commissioner, superintendent of police or other authorised officers for processions, meetings, assemblies, functions, celebrations, training programmes and other organised activities held on government property or premises.

The law will apply to private associations, societies, trusts, clubs, bodies of individuals and other entities, whether registered or unregistered. The Bill defines a procession as a congregation of 10 or more people and specifically includes political parties, religious groups, social organisations and route marches.

Permission can be denied on grounds including public order, decency, morality, the safety and security of persons and property, preservation of communal harmony, prevention of slogans, ensuring smooth traffic flow and preventing inconvenience to educational institutions and hospitals.

The Bill also provides exemptions for marriages, funerals, religious ceremonies and gatherings for educational, leisure, amusement and recreational purposes.

The proposed legislation provides stringent punishment for violations. Unauthorised use of public property can attract imprisonment of up to three years and a fine of up to ₹5 lakh. A subsequent offence can attract imprisonment of up to five years and a fine of up to ₹10 lakh. The proposed offences are cognisable and non-bailable, allowing the police to arrest without a warrant.

Why is the RSS in the frame?

Although the Bill does not name any organisation, RSS shakhas in Karnataka are often held in school grounds, parks and other public spaces.

This has triggered an angry response from BJP lawmakers, who see the proposed legislation as an attempt by the Congress government to target the RSS.

BJP state president and MLA B.Y. Vijayendra accused the Congress government of making a “backdoor attempt” to control the RSS and challenged it to directly restrict the organisation’s activities in the state.

V. Sunil Kumar, whose political journey from student leadership to becoming a legislator began through the Sangh Parivar, also criticised the proposed legislation. He said even former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi could not destroy the Sangh and argued that the Congress government’s Bill would not be able to stop its activities.

The Congress government has rejected the charge. Home Minister Priyank Kharge, who recently stepped up his criticism of the RSS and questioned its finances, said the Bill does not name the organisation and argued that no group should be allowed to use public property without permission. 

“Does the Bill name the RSS? This Bill is not against anybody. Can we allow individuals, organisations or political parties to use public places without permission?” Kharge said. He also questioned the BJP’s objection to a permission regime that would apply to everyone, pointing out that the Congress itself has to seek permission to hold programmes on public property.

The political backdrop has added another layer to the controversy. Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar recently announced the formation of the Bharat Jodo Yuvaka Sangha, which is expected to engage rural youth through cultural and sporting activities and leadership programmes.

The initiative has been seen as part of the Congress’s broader attempt to build a grassroots network among young people.

How will it become law?

Cabinet approval does not make the proposal law. The government must first introduce the Bill in the Karnataka Legislature. Once introduced, it will undergo the legislative process, including discussion on its principles and detailed consideration of its clauses. The government or legislators can propose amendments, and the Bill can also be referred to a committee for examination.

As Karnataka has a bicameral legislature, an ordinary Bill has to pass through both the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council. If the Council passes the Bill without amendments, it can be sent to the Governor for consideration. If the Council proposes amendments, the Assembly will have to consider them.

In case of disagreement between the two Houses, the Constitution provides a mechanism under which, subject to the prescribed procedure and time limits, the Legislative Assembly can ultimately prevail over the Council on an ordinary Bill.

Once the legislature completes the process, the Bill will be sent to the Governor. It becomes law only after the Governor gives assent and comes into force in accordance with its commencement provision.

The ruling Congress has a majority in both Houses, making legislative passage less challenging for the government. However, the Bill will still have to complete the constitutional process, including consideration by the Governor.