Why the tank will outlast its obituaries
Drones and algorithms have not ended armoured warfare. They have ended the idea that a tank can fight alone
The upcoming book Armour 2040 explores the evolution of tanks and armoured warfare, arguing that while modern surveillance and drones have transformed the battlefield, armoured vehicles remain essential when integrated into a networked multidomain combat system and supported by skilled personnel.
The upcoming book Armour 2040 explores the evolution of tanks and armoured warfare, arguing that while modern surveillance and drones have transformed the battlefield, armoured vehicles remain essential when integrated into a networked multidomain combat system and supported by skilled personnel.
The upcoming book Armour 2040 explores the evolution of tanks and armoured warfare, arguing that while modern surveillance and drones have transformed the battlefield, armoured vehicles remain essential when integrated into a networked multidomain combat system and supported by skilled personnel.
Every generation writes the tank’s obituary. The machine gun was meant to end manoeuvre. Bombers were meant to make armies redundant. Anti-tank missiles, attack helicopters and precision munitions each took a turn as the weapon that would finally finish the job. Today, the undertaker is a drone worth a few hundred dollars, and the pictures are hard to ignore: a burning turret, a blown hatch, a machine that took years to build undone in seconds.
The pictures are real. The conclusion drawn from them is not. Look at what recent wars actually show. In Nagorno-Karabakh, armour was destroyed because it was poorly protected and mishandled against a connected reconnaissance-and-strike system. In Ukraine, tanks have proved both vulnerable and indispensable, and neither side has stopped acquiring, repairing and fielding them. In Gaza, protected mobility mattered most in dense urban terrain, the very place where armour was supposed to be least useful. The pattern holds across all three. A tank left alone, without infantry, air defence, electronic cover and timely intelligence, burns. A tank within a combined arms team still decides battles.
That is the argument of Armour 2040: Steel, Silicon and the Future Battlespace, to be released by the Chief of the Army Staff at the Mechanised Forces Symposium on 11 November. Its premise is blunt. Whether armour has a future is the wrong question. The useful question is what form that future must take.
A battlespace with no hiding place
The change that matters most is not a weapon. It is visibility. Satellites, drones and electronic sensors now watch the ground without pause, and concealment, the armoured commander's oldest friend, grows harder to find every year. Operation Sindoor offered a South Asian glimpse of what follows. Precision missiles, armed drones, loitering munitions and long-range fires can shape a fight from a distance. Assembly areas, fuel and ammunition dumps, command posts and maintenance depots, once safe behind the lines, can become targets before the first tank meets the enemy.
Armour still mattered in that operation, in deterrence, in escalation control, and in breaking enemy defences with direct tank fire. But it entered a battlespace already shaped by other domains. The next war in South Asia may not open with a massed armoured thrust at all. It may open with a cyber strike, a jammed network, and a swarm overhead.
From a collection of tanks to a single system
If survival no longer rests on the thickness of steel alone, what does it rest on? The book answers with a concept it calls the Integrated Armoured Multidomain Battle System. Strip away the name, and the idea is simple. Sensors, shooters, drones, unmanned ground vehicles and human commanders should work as a single network that sees, decides and acts together, faster than the enemy can.
In practice, that changes ordinary things. Drones stop being specialist assets at the edge of the formation and become standard equipment within it. Electronic warfare stops being somebody else’s job. Active protection, decoys and signature management sit alongside armour plate as equal parts of survivability. And the speed of decision-making becomes the real currency of combat, because the side that observes first, understands first and acts first gains a disproportionate edge.
Artificial intelligence has a place in this, but the book is careful about where. The algorithm can sort the data and shorten decision time. It cannot decide what is worth the risk. That stays with the commander.
An honest look at home
Curtain-raisers tend to flatter. This book does not. Its audit of the Indian Armoured Corps finds neither an obsolete relic nor a future-ready force. It finds an experienced, institutionally strong Corps with a transitional inventory. Trials of active protection systems have dragged on for years without a service-wide decision. Legacy communications on the T-72 and early T-90S were never designed for a contested electromagnetic environment. Doctrine has moved towards integrated battle groups faster than the equipment, networks and training required to carry it.
Two programmes carry the Corps towards 2040. The Future Ready Combat Vehicle is meant to replace the T-72. The Zorawar light tank is meant to close a gap on the northern front, where, the book notes, China’s own light tank has already been in service for several years. Neither can be assumed to arrive on time. The Arjun took decades to reach limited service, and India’s infantry combat vehicle programme has gone close to two decades without a fielded platform. The book asks planners to treat today’s timelines as best-case scenarios and to build in hedges.
Geography makes all of this harder. The Corps must be ready for the desert and canal-laced plains in the west, the high plateau and passes in the north, and the Siliguri Corridor, a narrow neck of land barely twenty to twenty-two kilometres wide. Two nuclear-armed neighbours, each with disputed borders and the potential to act in concert, leave no room for a single armour template.
The man behind the machine
For all its technology, the book keeps returning to a human point. Its dedication says that as machines and networks do more, the man behind the machine will matter most. A tank crew shares a small steel space and a great deal of risk, and the trust that grows there is something no network can issue. The chapter on professional military education argues for officers who are scholar-warriors: sound in gunnery and manoeuvre, comfortable with data and autonomy, and capable of strategic judgement. The deciding edge, it says, belongs to the side with better-trained minds inside the tanks.
The tank has survived every weapon built to kill it, not because it was invulnerable but because it kept evolving. It is evolving again. Whether the Indian Armoured Corps leads that change or merely watches it will depend less on the next purchase order than on what is decided over the next few years about doctrine, networks and people. The obituary is premature. It will remain so only if the Corps acts as if it knows that.
The author is a former Director General Mechanised Forces and the author of ‘Armour 2040: Steel, Silicon and the Future Battlespace’ (KW Publishers, New Delhi).