The Indian aviation sector is grappling with the potential for companies to own both airports and airlines, a move strongly opposed by IndiGo's Co-Founder due to concerns about conflicts of interest and passenger detriment. Experts highlight the airport operator's control over essential resources like flight slots, making dual ownership a significant issue. Although Adani Enterprises has refuted rumors of launching its own airline, ongoing discussions about potentially easing ownership restrictions on airport operators suggest a shift in regulatory consideration. Current regulations enforce a level playing field by limiting airport companies' stakes in airlines, a principle analysts emphasize as crucial for fair competition. The debate intensifies amidst financial pressures on existing major airlines and the prospect of new, well-funded entrants altering the market landscape.

The Indian aviation sector is grappling with the potential for companies to own both airports and airlines, a move strongly opposed by IndiGo's Co-Founder due to concerns about conflicts of interest and passenger detriment. Experts highlight the airport operator's control over essential resources like flight slots, making dual ownership a significant issue. Although Adani Enterprises has refuted rumors of launching its own airline, ongoing discussions about potentially easing ownership restrictions on airport operators suggest a shift in regulatory consideration. Current regulations enforce a level playing field by limiting airport companies' stakes in airlines, a principle analysts emphasize as crucial for fair competition. The debate intensifies amidst financial pressures on existing major airlines and the prospect of new, well-funded entrants altering the market landscape.

The Indian aviation sector is grappling with the potential for companies to own both airports and airlines, a move strongly opposed by IndiGo's Co-Founder due to concerns about conflicts of interest and passenger detriment. Experts highlight the airport operator's control over essential resources like flight slots, making dual ownership a significant issue. Although Adani Enterprises has refuted rumors of launching its own airline, ongoing discussions about potentially easing ownership restrictions on airport operators suggest a shift in regulatory consideration. Current regulations enforce a level playing field by limiting airport companies' stakes in airlines, a principle analysts emphasize as crucial for fair competition. The debate intensifies amidst financial pressures on existing major airlines and the prospect of new, well-funded entrants altering the market landscape.

If the same company owns the airport you fly from and the airline you fly in, is that fair? The buzz around the subject continues in the aviation segment and has now taken a fresh turn. One major reaction came in from IndiGo’s Co-Founder and Managing Director Rahul Bhatia, who said there is no example anywhere in the world of such a model working, he said, and allowing it would create a massive conflict of interest that would, over time, go against the interest of passengers.

Experts say that his worry is easy to picture. An airport operator decides who gets which slot, which parking bay, which gate and which counter. A slot is a permission to land or take off at a particular time. The 7 am and 7 pm slots are gold, because that is when business travellers fly. If the man distributing these slots is also running his own airline, the referee and one of the teams become the same person.

Interestingly, Adani Enterprises also told the stock exchanges that it is not planning to launch an airline at all. The company called the such reports baseless and factually incorrect, and said plainly that no such proposal is under consideration. Civil aviation ministry sources, which many reports have quoted, have indicated that there is no formal proposal yet and the talks are at an early stage, and that even if the rule is relaxed, the ownership allowed to an airport operator may still be limited. In other words, the door is being examined, not opened.

“When the government hands over an airport to a private company to build and run for several decades, the two sides sign a detailed contract that lists exactly what the company may and may not do. Ownership limits are written into these contracts. At Delhi and Mumbai, the airport company may own only up to 10 paise out of every rupee of an airline's shares, that is 10 per cent. At Jewar's Noida International Airport and at Navi Mumbai, the limit is 26 per cent, roughly one-fourth. Owning shares simply means owning that much of the company. Importantly, the restriction works both ways: an airline is equally blocked from taking control of an airport. The idea was never to punish anyone it was to keep the pitch level,” pointed out defence and aerospace analyst Girish Linganna.

However, given the situation, the timing of this debate is interesting, because the big airlines are themselves under pressure. IndiGo has just reported a loss for the second quarter in a row. In the April-June quarter it lost ₹238 crore, whereas in the same three months of last year it had earned a profit of ₹2,176 crore. So a healthy profit has turned into a loss, a fall of nearly 111 per cent. Costly fuel, a weaker rupee and flight disruptions caused by the Iran-Israel-US conflict did the damage. IndiGo's share price also slipped by as much as 3.7 per cent on the day the policy report appeared, according to market reports. This tells us two things. Aviation remains a brutal business even for the market leader, and investors clearly fear that a new, deep-pocketed entrant would hurt existing players.

Quietly, though, competition is already arriving. The civil aviation ministry has given its first clearance the initial green signal a company needs before it can apply for a flying licence to Al Hind Air and FlyExpress, joining Uttar Pradesh-based Shankh Air. All three hope to begin flying during 2026.

“The government's discomfort is understandable, since IndiGo and Air India together hold close to 90 per cent of domestic capacity, and last winter's mass cancellations at IndiGo showed how one airline's bad week can paralyse an entire country. There is also a small irony here. IndiGo, which is objecting the loudest, is itself the launch carrier at Adani's Navi Mumbai airport. Rival and partner at the same time,” added Linganna.

However, currently nothing has changed on paper. No rule has been amended, no airline announced, no cabinet approval sought. For the passenger, the test remains the same: more flights and cheaper fares are welcome, but only if every aircraft on the tarmac is treated equally. Fair play must not be the price we pay for competition.

TAGS