Is the Ascendance of AI Art Generator a Threat to Human Artists?


As an art enthusiast, the prospect of artificial intelligence taking over the role of artists unsettles me. It raises questions about the future of art and how it would be affected if AI could produce artwork that rivals or surpasses human creations. However, many experts argue that AI in art is merely a tool that artists can utilize to enhance their abilities and unleash their creativity. Rather than replacing human artists, AI serves as an extension of their skills. As AI technology advances, we can expect to witness more artworks generated by AI. Although some of these pieces may be indistinguishable from those created by humans, they will always lack the unique touch that only humans can bring to art. Nevertheless, AI art has the potential to redefine the concept of being an artist in the 21st century. The idea of AI creating artistic works has gained significant attention in recent years, leading to the development of numerous AI art generator apps. In our next discussion, we will delve deeper into what constitutes AI art and whether it poses a threat to human artists.

What is artificial intelligence (AI) art?

Jason Allen recently made waves in the art world with his award-winning piece, Th tre D op ra Spatial. What made this achievement even more remarkable was the revelation that it was created using an AI art generator called Midjourney. This powerful app can generate incredibly realistic images with just a few commands from the user.

AI-generated art is a form of digital art that is produced by algorithms or computers, rather than by human hands. It encompasses various subcategories such as generative art, computational art, robotic art, evolutionary art, and cyborg art. Some critics argue that AI-generated art cannot be considered true art because it lacks a human creator. However, this viewpoint could be applied to many traditional artworks that were created with the assistance of machines or tools.

Allen's artwork serves as a testament to the rapid advancements in AI-generated art. The process involves AI analyzing existing images and then creating pieces of art that imitate human creations through machine learning techniques. While some argue that AI-created works lack soul or emotional connection, similar criticisms can be directed towards traditional artworks created solely for commercial purposes.

In essence, Allen's success highlights both the potential and controversy surrounding AI-generated art. It challenges our notions of creativity and raises questions about what truly defines a work of artistic expression.

How does AI art compare to traditional art forms?

AI art has the potential to surpass traditional art in terms of realism and lifelikeness. By tapping into a vast collection of images and data, AI can create artworks that are more detailed and realistic than those based on a single photo or memory. For instance, an AI artist could compose a painting by incorporating thousands of landscape photographs. However, traditional art has its own merits as it is crafted by human artists who infuse their emotions and experiences into their work. This personal touch makes traditional artworks more relatable and meaningful compared to AI creations. Moreover, traditional artworks often possess deeper symbolism as they are intentionally created with specific purposes in mind. Ultimately, the superiority between AI and traditional art is subjective and depends on individual preferences as viewers. If you favor highly detailed imagery, AI artworks might be your preference; whereas if you seek emotional depth and significance, traditional artwork might resonate with you more strongly. Regardless of the chosen medium, both types of artwork offer unique qualities that can be appreciated by different audiences.


Are there ethical concerns about using AI in the art world?

Do you have concerns about the replacement of humans by AI? The use of AI to generate art has faced criticism for being a form of automated plagiarism, as it relies on ingesting millions of existing art pieces. This has raised deeper fears about the potential destruction of human creativity, blurring the boundaries between reality and artificial creations, and stifling human artistic expression. The primary ethical issue with AI-generated art lies in its removal of creative control from the artist. In traditional art forms, artists have full authority over their work, including choosing the medium, incorporating colors, and conveying their intended message. In contrast, AI-generated art significantly diminishes the artist's involvement in decision-making as they must rely on algorithms to produce their artwork. Consequently, this eliminates the personal touch often associated with artistic expression. Additionally, another ethical concern is that AI-generated art may lead to plagiarism. As algorithms are designed to learn from existing data, there is a risk that they will simply replicate or imitate existing artworks rather than creating something original. This not only undermines artistic integrity but also poses a threat to artists' livelihoods. Ultimately, if someone can easily reproduce an artwork using an algorithm, there would be little incentive for individuals to purchase original pieces

In the realm of art, the utilization of AI raises a myriad of ethical issues. Primarily, it infringes upon the artist's capacity for creative expression and opens the door to potential plagiarism. Nevertheless, these concerns should not deter us from incorporating AI into the world of art entirely. Instead, we ought to acknowledge these concerns and implement measures to alleviate them. For instance, we could devise algorithms that necessitate a substantial input from the artist prior to generating a final outcome. Alternatively, we could establish a comprehensive database comprising original artworks that algorithms must refer to when producing new pieces. By adopting such precautions, we can ensure that AI-generated art adheres to ethical standards.

Will AI Art Replace Human Artists?

Will AI art replace humans? No, AI art is not a substitute for human artists or human intelligence. It serves as a tool for artists to create various forms of art. Similar to how CAD programs have become essential for many artists and designers, AI will become vital for those interested in digital artwork. Suhail utilized AI to produce a children's book where DALL-E generated the images and GPT-3 wrote the story based on data from quality children's books. Surprisingly, this book has already sold hundreds of copies on Amazon. Perhaps it presents a new opportunity for writers to earn money using AI. Nevertheless, AI has the potential to redefine what it means to be an artist in the 21st century. As AI advances and its ability to create realistic and emotionally captivating artwork improves, determining whether AI can be considered an artist in its own right becomes increasingly challenging. For this AI-powered tool , it sufficiently improve people’s photo editing work.   At present, we can confidently assert that AI-generated artwork is not a replacement for human-created art but rather an exciting new realm for artists to explore.

What is the future of human-AI collaboration?

AI art can serve as a source of inspiration for your own creative endeavors. Additionally, you have the opportunity to generate your own AI art and use it as a catalyst for new ideas. Exploring the history of AI art and how society has embraced this innovative medium over time can also provide valuable insights. Some artists have taken this exploration to another level. For instance, David O Reilly pushed the boundaries by utilizing AI tools to create an animated children's cartoon named Bartak. The astonishing images produced by AI for his fairy tale book showcase its remarkable capabilities. Similarly, Nao u, an independent developer, completed a 2D shooting game called Shoon in just three days with the aid of AI tools. While the game itself may not be groundbreaking, it is worth noting that advancements in 3D model AI generation are expanding the possibilities for game development and animation .

In this sense, AI will not replace human artists but instead allow them to focus more on other aspects of the creative process. In this way, it’s possible that AI could even help humans create more art than they otherwise would have been able to make: if only because it allows them to spend less time on making the art itself and more on thinking about what it means in the context of their culture.”

The use of AI in the arts is still relatively new. However, it’s possible that the technology could be used to help artists create more art than they would have been able to make without it. If AI can help human workers focus less on making their work and more on thinking about what it means in the context of their culture, then it can serve as a powerful tool for creativity.

AI will not replace human artists, but rather enable them to focus on different aspects of the creative process. This could potentially result in an increase in the amount of art created, as artists can dedicate less time to the physical creation and more time to contemplating its cultural significance. The use of AI in the arts is still relatively new, but it holds potential for helping artists produce more work than they would have without it. By allowing human creators to shift their attention from production to cultural interpretation, AI becomes a powerful tool for nurturing creativity. AI-generated art has the ability to influence and inspire future generations of artists and art enthusiasts alike. Artists can utilize AI technology to generate new works and acquire new skills. Additionally, AI opens up opportunities for artists to reach previously untapped audiences. It also provides avenues for artists to monetize their work that were previously unfeasible. Ultimately, there is always room for innovation in creative fields, as evidenced by how AI has already sparked the creation of novel art forms like generative music.


AI art offers artists an exhilarating new realm to delve into, but it should not be regarded as a substitute for art created by humans. As AI technology advances and its capacity to generate lifelike and emotionally captivating artwork expands, determining whether AI can genuinely be considered an artist in its own right will become increasingly complex. Presently, we can confidently affirm that AI-generated artwork cannot replace human-created masterpieces; instead, it presents a thrilling frontier for artistic exploration. In the future, there is potential for AI to aid humans in producing a greater volume of art than they could achieve unassisted, ushering in a fresh era of artistic expression. If AI can assist artists in diverting their focus from the process of creation towards contemplating the cultural significance of their work, it has the potential to serve as an influential tool for fostering creativity.

Articles appearing as INFOCUS/THE WEEK FOCUS are marketing initiatives

📣 The Week is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@TheWeekmagazine) and stay updated with the latest headlines