THE WORLD’S RICHEST cricket body was without elected officials for the last three years. During this time, both its influence and credibility took a beating. President-elect Sourav Ganguly will have less than 10 months to deliver. However, being a man who knows his own mind, Ganguly’s short tenure is likely to be eventful.
In a telephone interview with THE WEEK, Ganguly made it clear that he took on the responsibility only because the members wanted him to. He said that renegotiating India’s position within the ICC, finding a practical solution to the vexed conflict of interest clause and improving first-class cricket were on top of his agenda. Edited excerpts:
For a long time, many people have wanted you to take charge once elections took place. What finally made you say yes?
[Long pause...] the members. At the end of the day, it is decided by people.
There was a contest between Brijesh Patel and yourself. How crazy was it?
Brijesh is a friend. I would have been happy even if he had been appointed, which I thought had happened. I am also happy that I have been appointed. I mean what I say; nothing more, nothing less.
Do you think 10 months offers too little time to complete the tasks you want to do?
It is not in my hand. Whatever time I have, I will do my best.
You termed the current situation in Indian cricket an emergency. But is it as serious as it was when you were named captain after the match-fixing scandal?
It is similar. It was a young, new team then. Same is the case with our office bearers. They are completely new, because the current system—the disqualification criteria— has forced this upon us.
Also read
- Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli's T20I future: Here's what Sourav Ganguly thinks
- 'Didn't remove Kohli from captaincy': Sourav Ganguly
- ICC World Cup: Sourav Ganguly names these 2 teams biggest hurdle before India
- Difficult to understand Rahane's elevation to Test vice captaincy, just after comeback: Ganguly
- Wrestlers' stir: Mahapanchayat at Jantar Mantar today; Vinesh reacts to Ganguly's remarks
The conflict of interest clause has been a major hurdle for former cricketers to come into administration. But what is the way out?
It has to be more practical. You cannot throw people out of everything. I believe [there is] conflict only when you are in a position to influence and decide other roles. If they are selected as a commentator or coach, it is on their talent. There is no motive there. I think those have to be left out of the clause.
Are you looking to involve your former teammates in matters related to the game?
Yes. I have not thought about the role they will play. Credibility of the BCCI is important.
The ICC in its meeting decided on a new rights cycle—have more ICC events, including two World Cups in four years. Is that overkill?
I have not gone through the ICC meeting details because it happened yesterday (when BCCI nominations were taking place). I need to look at them properly. But India’s position in the ICC needs to change.We will find a way. Keeping India out of such key decisions is like keeping Brazil out of football!
What would be your approach towards ICC? A typical Sourav Ganguly approach—adversarial and aggressive—or understanding?
Both. But, decisions need to be taken quickly.
You said that a priority area will be first-class cricket. What exactly needs looking into?
Everything. Playing conditions, players’ future and players’ remuneration. Everything.
How do you view the role of the Players’ Association, which will be involved in Indian cricket administration for the first time?
We welcome it. We will respect it, and ensure that we work together.