Scrolling through your social media feed and boom you find that one video. The reel that promises to cure everything. Sometimes losing weight in seven days or reversing diabetes naturally. Organic food ingredients that cure 90 per cent of cancers, regrow hair overnight or boost sexual performance with just one magical trick. Sounds exactly like what you were looking for! You watch it, you feel convinced. Maybe even share it with a friend who “needs this.” Job done and you are the saviour. But here’s the twist. "Misinformation" is a buzzword now, though health misinformation is relatively less talked about. Health misinformation doesn’t just mislead; it can directly affect your health, your family and your friends.
Of course, waiting for a professional fact-checker is not always practical. The good news is that you don’t need to be a doctor or researcher to verify a viral health claim. In fact, you can fact-check most health misinformation in just 60 seconds using a few simple habits. One of the fastest and most practical ways to do this is by using the SIFT method. A quick strategy designed to investigate online claims before believing or sharing them. It is simple, effective, and often takes less than a minute.
1. The first step is Stop! Before liking, saving, or sharing a post, pause for a moment. Ask yourself: who is saying this and why? If the content makes you feel shocked, excited, or scared, that emotional reaction is actually a warning sign. Strong emotions often make us skip verification and believe information instantly.
2. Investigate the source: If the page, doctor, or website is unfamiliar, take a few seconds to search their name. A quick search or even adding “Wikipedia” beside the name can help you understand the source. Whether it is credible, qualified, or known for spreading misleading content.
For your daily dose of medical news and updates, visit: HEALTH
3. Find better coverage: Do not rely on a single reel, post, or blog. Instead, check whether trusted health organisations or medical platforms support the claim. Reliable sources such as the World Health Organisation, PubMed or Google Scholar reflects scientific research. If no credible medical body is discussing the claim, that is a major red flag.
4. Trace the claim back to its original context: Some of the social media posts are misusing research, screenshots, or even quotes from a doctor. The research may have been done, but the conclusion that is shown in the social media reel may have been exaggerated or even completely distorted. Taking a few seconds of your time to look up the original research or statement will help you understand if you are reading this out of context or not.
Aside from SIFT, other small practices can help you a great deal in keeping you safe from false information. One is to practice "lateral reading." This means that instead of just staying on a webpage that you think is false, you should try opening other tabs and reading about the same thing from other sources that have been verified. Another is that you should look for dates. Health science is a rapidly advancing field.
Top specialised health fact-checkers
Health Feedback (healthfeedback.org): A worldwide network of scientists who sort fact from fiction in health and medical media coverage.
iHealthFacts (ihealthfacts.ie): Staffed by researchers at the University of Galway, this site allows the public to submit health claims for verification.
Examine.com: Provides independent, evidence-based analysis on nutrition and supplements.
Leading medical & academic sources
MedlinePlus (medlineplus.gov): Managed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NIH). It is considered a premier, trusted resource for comprehensive, peer-reviewed health information.
PubMed / PubMed Central: Ideal for finding original, peer-reviewed scientific studies and medical research.
CDC (cdc.gov): Authoritative source for public health, disease, and vaccination guidelines.
Cochrane Library: Provides high-quality, evidence-based systematic reviews.
Key red flags for unreliable information
Sales Focus: If a site is trying to sell a product rather than provide information, it is likely biased.
No Citations: Trustworthy information should always link to peer-reviewed research or reputable institutions.
Sensationalism: Claims that sound too good to be true or promise "cures" often are.
This story is done in collaboration with First Check, which is the health journalism vertical of DataLEADS.