Congress on Sunday accused the BJP-led government of giving "special treatment" to private players in the telecom sector at the cost of public sector entities and asked the prime minister if the ruling party received benefits in terms of electoral bonds from them.
Addressing mediapersons, Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera alleged public sector companies like BSNL and MTNL, which were making profits under the previous UPA 1 and 2 governments, were now running at losses while the government is promoting and giving relief to private sector companies.
"Why are you meting out step-motherly treatment to public sector companies and this special treatment to private sector undertakings. I want to ask Modi ji if his party received benefits in terms of electoral bonds from the latter," Khera said.
also read
- Will telecom tariffs increase after Lok Sabha elections? Analyst says Airtel will benefit most
- Centre approves Rs 1.64 lakh crore package to revive BSNL
- BSNL talks of large-scale 4G rollout, even as minister makes India's first 5G call
- Centre calls for bids for BSNL, MTNL asset monetisation
- Why Air India sale could fast-track BSNL's privatisation
His remarks come in the backdrop of telecom companies Vodafone-Idea and Bharti Airtel announcing on Sunday increases in rates of their mobile phone network services.
Khera alleged that BSNL and MTNL were making a profit of over Rs 7,000-plus crore under UPA 1 and 2 but were running losses of over Rs 11,000 crore for the past five years.
"You deliberately allowed them (public sector companies) to bleed to death," Khera said.
"Look at the efforts to sell BPCL, Container Corporation of India, Shipping Corporation of India. They also took money from the capital reserves of the RBI and they are out to sell Maharatna companies of India. So the strategy towards public sector of this government is that if there is a profit-making company, try and reduce its profit, if you fail in that case sell it," he alleged.
Questioning the intention of the government, the Congress spokesperson said, "There has to be a quid pro quo. Why would a government go out of its way to destroy the profit-making public sector companies and try maximizing the profits of private sectors companies? At the end of the day we end up paying for these stunts."
