Anuja Chauhan http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan.rss en Tue Aug 06 15:22:32 IST 2019 https://www.theweek.in/privacy-an-settlement.html the-cheerleader-effect <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/07/30/the-cheerleader-effect.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/7/30/71-cheerleader-new.jpg" /> <p>Everybody loves a boy band. From the Beatles, to Backstreet Boys and Boyz II Men, to BTS and One Direction who made the hashtag #10yearsof1D trend just a few days ago, we love the freshness, energy and sheer frisson they bring into our jaded lives. There is just something about the combined impact created by a grouping of four or five comely youths, with freshly broken voices, tousled hair and eager eyes (seemingly) seeking true love, that creates a veritable pheromone storm in the bosoms of women everywhere. Girls want them, boys want to be them and everybody across the board is quite comprehensively enchanted.</p> <p>Of course, the cheerleader effect, also known as the group attractiveness effect—a cognitive bias which causes people to think individuals are more attractive when they are in a group—has a major role to play here. The term was first coined by that fictional “high-functioning-sociopath” Barney Stinson on the show <i>How I Met Your Mother</i>. Canny, womanising Barney pointed out knowledgeably to his more naïve friends that women (like cheerleaders) always look more attractive in a group, but when separated out, and met one-on-one, cease to look as attractive.</p> <p>Like a grouping of scatter cushions on a couch, if you are into home décor. Or a group of fighter planes flying in formation, if you are into the action stuff. Anyway, the point I am trying to make here is that record producer and media personality Simon Cowell knew what he was doing when he picked out a motley crew of ordinary-ish British lads with strong singing voices and put them together to create hysteria and history with One Direction ten years ago, and that Rahul Gandhi is looking pretty sad now that he has been separated from Sachin Pilot and Jyotiraditya Scindia—and they are cutting a pretty sorry figure on their own, too. Rumours of Milind Deora and Jitin Prasada getting itchy feet are not helping either.</p> <p>See, if you are a very strong talent, you do not need a boy band. They then fade into the background to become merely your accompanists— like Bruce Springsteen and the E street band, for example. Or Indira Gandhi and the sycophants. Or Narendra Modi and the Pink Lotus Gang. But if the group is greater than the sum of its parts, and nobody is a stand-out performer on their own, then it makes sense to stick with the band. Ditch it, and you end up in obscurity or, to paraphrase a One D superhit, you end up feeling “so low, since you went solo, hole in the middle of your heart like a polo”.</p> <p>Rahul—the Harry Styles of the Congress Party Boy Band, if you will—put out a solo album recently, namely, his China videos. They seem vaguely reminiscent of Harry Styles’s first solo ballad, the overproduced, world-weary-ish ‘stop your crying, it’s a sign of the times’, ie, hardcore Harry fans felt vindicated in their belief that Harry was the talent that powered One D, but everybody else on the planet was left pretty much unshaken.</p> <p>Meanwhile, Sachin and Jyotiraditya are prowling around radiating a sort of sullen, wronged Zayn Malik vibe, all broody angst and enigmatic utterances, intermittently belting out Sufi-style wails and romancing beautiful women, and wondering why their life has been reduced to just “f#@king and fighting on, it’s a paradise and it’s a war zone”.</p> <p>I was never a groupie of the Congress Party Boy Band, but I did dig a couple of their early hits. My advice to them would be to put their petulance and egos aside, kiss and make up and reunite as a band. Sure, they are older, and stouter, and staler, but they are definitely better together. None of them are going to create history on their own.</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/07/30/the-cheerleader-effect.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/07/30/the-cheerleader-effect.html Thu Jul 30 14:55:53 IST 2020 shameful-disgusting-forcefulness <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/07/16/shameful-disgusting-forcefulness.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/7/16/forcefulness-new.jpg" /> <p>This week one Shubham Mishra, who I have never heard of before—unleashed a vile diatribe against a stand-up comic called Agrima Joshua—who I had never heard of before either, for daring to poke fun at Shivaji—who, of course, we have all heard of.</p> <p>Agrima’s video, posted in 2019, is quite amusing, and anybody with even a modicum of intelligence and impartiality will grasp that she is not poking fun at Shivaji, but at the self-styled Shivaji <i>bhakts</i> on Quora. Anyway, such are the political and social realities on the ground today, that once her video caught the eye and the ire of the moral police, she took it down at once, and issued an unconditional apology.</p> <p>But this was not enough to appease Shubham, who released a video describing graphically how he would rape Agrima, in language so violent and hate-filled that it has given me nightmares. Shubham has over three lakh followers on Instagram, and the video has over 25.4 K likes. Which means that over 25,000 people watched this man describing how he would violate this young woman anally with his c**k, which would ram through her body like a snake till it emerged from her mouth and shut her up forever, and when they had finished watching, they pressed the red little heart that on Instagram connotes ‘like.’ Essentially, they all said, ya Shubham, go for it, we’re with you, <i>hum tumhare saath hain</i>.</p> <p>Thankfully, the real police stepped in and arrested the moral policer, who deleted his post, and put up a more cowed video, muttering that he never said anything about raping anyone, and how he respects women. This filthy piece of doublespeak, in which he continues to heap subdued hate on Agrima, has more than five lakh likes on YouTube already.</p> <p>I’ve no idea why people like Shubham zero in on people like Agrima—is it because she is attractive, and English speaking and earns a decent living, because she is on a stage with lipstick on, airing her political opinions, and not behind a kitchen counter swathed in a <i>ghoonghat</i>, silently rolling out <i>theplas</i>? Are they doing it to be popular? Or powerful? Do they really revere Shivaji so much? &nbsp;I am not clear, but the one thing that stands out quite clearly when you go through his feed is the desperate need to project forcefulness. This person thinks people respect that kind of macho, dominating figure, that adopting that persona is gonna make his life bloom with bright-red little hearts all the way.</p> <p>Another incident of brute force unfolded horribly in Tamil Nadu recently. Father and son duo Jayaraj and Bennix were arrested by the police and beaten so savagely for an entire weekend for the crime of keeping their mobile spare parts shop open 15 minutes past the curfew deadline, that they died in lock-up. Their family were then ordered to take the bodies home, and instructed to bring ‘dark lungis’ with them­—to hide the multiple fractures and the rectal bleeding the abuse had caused.</p> <p>Apart from the sheer impunity on display, again, what stood out was the brutality overkill. And we are seeing it everywhere. Whether in the shooting down of Vikas Dubey, or in the tone of our popular TV news anchors, what we are increasingly seeing everywhere (except re: China) is a romancing and a fetishising of the tough, vigilante-ish, dominatrix persona.</p> <p>Donald Trump summed up this thinking well when he told his governors how they should handle the #BLM protestors: ‘You must dominate. You’re gonna have to dominate, or you’re gonna look like a bunch of jerks.’</p> <p>In a world growing increasingly chaotic, with all systems compromised and all institutions crumbling, sometimes, people who project a superficial, toxic kind of toughness can appear to have all the answers. But here is the thing.</p> <p>They never do.</p> <p>editor@theweek.in</p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/07/16/shameful-disgusting-forcefulness.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/07/16/shameful-disgusting-forcefulness.html Thu Jul 16 16:22:45 IST 2020 the-spectacle-that-life-is <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/06/18/the-spectacle-that-life-is.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/6/18/spectacle-new.jpg" /> <p>Remember the good old days when you did not have to prove you loved your country by chanting Bharat Mata ki Jai every time somebody asked you to? When standing up for the national anthem was optional? Something you did voluntarily, out of love, and not with one eye on the other people in the movie theatre who may record a video of you sitting it out and report you to the cops? Remember the good old days when chief ministers did not have to recite the Hanuman Chalisa to appease the media and prove they were true believers? When fans did not zoom aggressively into the social media photographs of movie stars, discover a cross in their <i>pooja ghar</i>, and immediately call them out for being a ‘fake’ Hindu?</p> <p>Remember when you could get married without the whole world wanting to know the price and brand of your lehenga, and the number and quality of hors d’oeuvres you served and to whom? Remember when a national disaster, like a flood or a pandemic, was a time for the nation to unite and hunker down to fight it together, instead of an excuse to extort money from various celebrities, corporates or religious institutions?</p> <p>When charity was not some sort of open, vulgar competition? With in-favour celebrities like Akshay Kumar flexing about the 025 crore he donated to the (slightly questionable) PM Cares fund and basically throwing down a gauntlet to other celebrities to donate loudly and visibly to the same fund too, or be torn apart by trolls and rabid media with Twitter hastags like #AjmerSharifPaiseNikaal and #SRKproveyourlove? Remember a time when the tragic suicide of a handsome young star at the top of his game could be mourned by the people who were close to him in peace and privacy, without photographs of his corpse going viral on social media, and trolls and the press breathing down their necks badgering them to put out a public profession of their grief?</p> <p>As I write this, people are aggressively bullying and castigating people from the industry for not looking sad enough at the news of Sushant Singh Rajput’s death, or looking too hypocritically sad and being two-faced fakers or whatever, while in the same breath speaking glibly about mental health and the importance of kindness and<br> empathy!</p> <p>Do they not realize that it is precisely this sort of relentless scrutiny that drives people to take such extreme steps in the first place? Grief used to be a private thing. Charity used to be a private thing. Religion used to be a private thing. Love used to be a private thing.</p> <p>But not any longer. Now, everything is spectacle, everything is a performance, the world is the coliseum and we all spend our lives sometimes hissing from the stands, and sometimes fighting in the ring. When everything is externalised, then inevitably, the core gets hollowed out. When we have one eye on our ‘performance’ and one eye on our highly judgmental, and mostly hostile ‘audience’, it is inevitable that we will begin to feel less, and to be less authentic as human beings.</p> <p>As a writer, I know that a sense of audience kills all spontaneity. The moment somebody stands behind me and starts to read what I am writing on my laptop, I freeze and start worrying about what they will think of me, and have to shut the lid quickly. This is what all of us are doing to ourselves every day. Not just celebrities, but even little teenage girls who have just, very excitedly and hopefully, opened their Insta or TikTok accounts. We are all constantly self-censoring, deleting real bits and pieces of our lives that we think are not good enough, surrendering to the society of the spectacle, and shutting down the lids on our inner living, breathing, authentic selves. It is death by collective suicide, a sort of Johar-of-the-soul, and it has to stop.</p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/06/18/the-spectacle-that-life-is.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/06/18/the-spectacle-that-life-is.html Mon Jun 22 08:22:45 IST 2020 poor-Indian-lives-matter <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/06/04/poor-Indian-lives-matter.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/6/4/Poor-Indian-lives.jpg" /> <p>My daughter came to me really triggered a couple of days ago. (That is current youth-speak for being upset, btw). She said she has a beef (i.e. issues, or a bone to pick with, nothing to do with eating cows) with most of her contemporaries on Instagram because they are all so shook (i.e. shaken/upset) by the death of George Floyd at the hands of the state police in Minneapolis.</p> <p>And, I am like accha, why? Because is it not good that your friends are aware and vocal about such a ghastly incident, an incident that may go on to be bigger than the Rodney King incident back in the early 1990s?</p> <p>And now suddenly, she has a beef with me, too. “Why do you know who Rodney King is?” she demands.</p> <p>I say something about it being a big story back then, when I was young and her age-ish.</p> <p>“Were you not all caught up in the Mandal Commission agitation then?” she demands next. “Why do you even remember Rodney King?”</p> <p>I explain that I had been really ambivalent on the Mandal issue; girls from my college (Miranda House, Delhi University) had agitated against the implementation of the report. They had gone to the Boat Club lawns with boot-polish kits, and offered to polish the shoes of passersby, to symbolically demonstrate that this would be the only job regular, non-reservation kids would get after graduation, as candidates from the reserved castes would grab all the creamy layer white-collar jobs. I had found this problematic on many levels, and so had not joined in these protests, even though it had all seemed like a lot of fun and a general atmosphere of revolution had prevailed in the college corridors and so on.</p> <p>She is slightly mollified. But only slightly. “What about the Babri Masjid demolition? What did you do then?”</p> <p>“And, I have to confess that I had not ‘done’ anything then either. I had just started working in advertising, and so had spent that December writing headline options for a combined print advertisement for the Christmas and New Year Celebrations at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Bhikaji Cama Place. I had been particularly proud of ‘25th ko Mother Mary, 31st ko Bloody Mary!’ The client had bombed it though.”</p> <p>She looks at me witheringly. Very ashamed, I lower my gaze.</p> <p>“And, yet, you remember Rodney King.”</p> <p>In my defense, I say that I remember the Babri Masjid demolition, too. I just had had no platform on which to register my protest, those days. “You are lucky,” I conclude. “So, what exactly do you find so triggering about your friends’ Insta stories?”</p> <p>“Do you know who Arvina Khatun is?” she counter-questions.</p> <p>“No,” I admit.</p> <p>“She is the dead lady on the railway station. The one with the baby playing by her side, in that video that just went viral. Do you know how many of my so-called ‘woke’ friends made an Insta story on her? None! Or, on the migrant workers walking home, and dying on the train tracks? Or on the police beating up poor women with lathis in the name of doing their duty? None! So, according to them, American black lives matter, and poor Indian lives do not!”</p> <p>The point she seems to be making is that her “liberal”, privileged friends live in India, but set their clocks to Eastern Standard Time or whatever. At this point I tell her that her slang is very Americanised too, but she waves this aside as a frivolous point.</p> <p>Maybe, these kids feel safer criticising the American government than they feel criticising their own, I suggest. “Because here there could be a backlash, na.”</p> <p>But she does not even think it is that.</p> <p>“Poor Indian deaths are just not considered cool, mamma,” she tells me bitterly. “It is as simple as that. Nobody gafs (i.e. gives a f#@%).”</p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/06/04/poor-Indian-lives-matter.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/06/04/poor-Indian-lives-matter.html Thu Jun 04 15:59:00 IST 2020 taking-bus-11-home <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/05/22/taking-bus-11-home.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/5/22/57-Taking-bus-11--home-new.jpg" /> <p>My grandmother had a rather charming description for pedestrian travel. If she wanted to go some place, and my grandfather would rue the cost of petrol involved in ferrying her there in the car, she would retort, very airily, “Theek hai, phir hum gyaarah number ki bus le lenge (Okay then, we will take the number 11 bus).”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Named for one’s two legs, the number 11 bus is a popular mode of travel in our country. For poorer people, it is often the only bus they can actually afford. Unlike the rich, who strap on Fitbits to obsessively count the number of steps they take in a day, poor people think nothing of walking a few kilometres to and from their workplaces daily. Nor do schoolchildren. People who live in north India are used to the annual influx of Kanwariyas—Shiva bhakts—who travel on foot from villages to the source of the Ganga to collect and carry home its holy water as an act of piety. Gandhiji iconised walking during the 384km-long Dandi March. Refugees walked with all their belongings on their backs during the partition. The logic of the walker is that if all else fails, and there is no other option, I will bloody well walk for it.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And therein lies the nub—all else has failed and there is no other option. For my grandmother, taking the #11 bus was an assertion of independence and self-sufficiency, but for the crores of poor Indians walking thousands of kilometres to their hometowns and villages, it is a defiant, double middle finger salute to the power structures that would deny them their liberty, emotions, mobility, nutrition, security and their very humanity.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And so we have a situation where a callous, clueless government and an elite bunch of banana-bread bakers sit out the quarantine on their privileged butts, while out there in real life, crores of poor people walk 1,000-plus kilometres to their homes, blistering their soles and birthing their babies on the dusty highways, getting crushed by goods trains one day or electrocuted by dangling wires on another.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It is so ironic that our prime minister and his finance minister—the thin-lipped lady who thinks talking to these long-distance walkers is “troubling them and wasting their time” (as if the whole freaking lockdown with no prior planning or provision was not troubling them or wasting their time!)—have dubbed their Lays Magic Masala (maximum air, minimum potato) Rs20 lakh crore package atmanirbhar, that is self-reliant. It is clear that if anybody wants to get out of this shit-fest alive, they should rely on nobody but their own self. No 56-inch chested superhero is gonna ride on a lotus-festooned golden chariot and save them. It is not an election rally after all! If it were, there would be buses for the poor folk, and an orange tee and packed meals and Rs500 a day. If it were a Kanwar yatra, there would be string beds and showers and music and dancing as well! But it is not. And so it is just going to have to be one foot in front of another, the camaraderie of other grindingly poor folk on the road, and the erratic, undependable kindness of the banana-bread bakers.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>When asked why they were not waiting a few days to take a bus or train, as these services are being reopened, the walkers just shook their heads. They have learnt the hard lesson well. A regime, marked by incompetence, callousness, bombast and hate, cannot be counted upon to deliver anything but more misery and a dilution of labour laws.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Have no expectations and you will not be disappointed. It is all about atmanirbharta now. Every man for himself and God for all. And a #11 bus ride home, or to hell.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/05/22/taking-bus-11-home.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/05/22/taking-bus-11-home.html Fri May 22 16:54:20 IST 2020 behind-boislockerroom <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/05/08/behind-boislockerroom.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/5/8/64-Behind-boislockerroom-new.jpg" /> <p>Bade bade deshon mein aisi choti choti baaten hoti rehti hain. In big-big countries, these small-small things keep happening. I am not sure what exactly Shah Rukh Khan’s character meant when he kept repeating this line in DDLJ (1995). He was probably going for a breezy, man-of-the-world larger picture vibe in order to impress the sheltered girl he had fallen for. But I find it so horribly apt for all the ghastly things that keep happening repeatedly in our country, no, all countries, and which we tend to let slide because there is, you know, larger stuff going on. Like we have a pandemic to fight, and the enemies of hindutva to battle, and a new central vista for Rajpath to build, and stuff.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But here is the thing: The little stuff is all mixed up ­­with the big stuff; it is both the fallout and the cause of the big stuff; and if we ignore it, it will snowball into the big-big stuff of tomorrow.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>This week, all the moms in the richer schools in Delhi are shook because some young girls have revealed an Instagram chat group called #boislockerroom, which has several hundred members and which exists basically to rate, discuss, dehumanise, and share nudes and morphed photos of attractive girls who go to the same schools as the boys. They have also come up with a list of ‘Girls we would like to Rape’ with the names of 20 underage Delhi schoolgirls on it.All the girls on this list ( I have known one of them since she was a baby) are attractive and active on Instagram—that is, they are “proud” and “uppity” and “flexing” on their hotness, and therefore need to be taken down by the self-appointed, morally-righteous ones on #boislockerroom.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>What is really getting to me is all these Delhi moms shaking their head and wondering, where did we go wrong, how did this happen?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Did they really think that all the filth that goes down on Twitter, the relentless, misogynistic unchecked trolling of any woman with an opinion, be it Mahua Moitra, Smriti Irani, Gauri Lankesh, Kangana Ranaut, Swara Bhasker, Payal Rohatgi, Sonia Gandhi, Barkha Dutt, Sania Mirza or Rana Ayyub—calling them randi (prostitute), kutiya (bitch), bar dancer—would have no fallout on the plastic young minds of our children?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Did they really think that when a man who is followed by the prime minister of India rolls his eyes at the assassination of a respected journalist and tweets t­­­hat all the puppies are crying because the bitch is dead, that our children would not be listening and learning?Did we really think when Neha Dhupia gets viciously trolled for telling a man on Roadies that he cannot hit his girlfriend even if she cheats on him with four guys, that our children would not be listening and learning?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And do they really think that the obnoxious, violent, self-righteous language that Arnab Goswami used against Sonia Gandhi recently is OK? That repeatedly invoking her maiden name and ordering her to go back to Italy and demonising her parents and her home, and basically acting like a nasty old mother-in-law from some creepy TV serial is OK?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Why the hell should Sonia Gandhi go back to Italy? Or, back to the kitchen? Or, back to the periphery, which is where Arnab and his paymasters clearly think women belong? Every time we normalise this language of violence and degradation, every time we let this shit slide, we are contributing to the hateful misogyny that is flourishing openly in our country. A boys-will-be-boys culture of rape-rap lyrics and item numbers, of selective, opportunistic outrage, where Jai Sita Ram has morphed into Jai Shri Ram and Sita has been reduced to a meek, complicit handmaiden, and all the Shurpanakhas get their noses cut off for daring to be bold. It is all one. It is all connected.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/05/08/behind-boislockerroom.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/05/08/behind-boislockerroom.html Fri May 08 17:31:25 IST 2020 lockdown-breakdown <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/04/23/lockdown-breakdown.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/4/23/25-Lockdown.jpg" /> <p>Horrible things are happening. As cabin fever intensifies on a locked down world, people are cracking up in strange and unprecedented ways. Salman Khan, for instance, has penned and crooned an utterly ghastly little ditty that makes every song from every Sooraj Barjatya film sound like a PhD thesis. It is so syrupy that after I played it on my phone, the screen felt sticky and chipp-chipp. I had to wipe it down with hand sanitiser.</p> <p>Ramchandra Guha has thrown a hissy fit and sacked Delhi’s #1 newspaper for refusing to publish his column questioning the government’s aesthetically hideous Rs20,000 crore project to ‘revamp’ New Delhi’s Central Vista (what will they call New Delhi after this revamp? New New Delhi, like Sri Sri Ravi Shankar?). I feel his pain and frustration, but I think he should have sucked it up and continued his column. People like him need to be seen and read in mainstream newspapers. If their writings only appear in liberal online publications, the kind BJP supporters wash their eyes out with Ganga jal after accidentally glimpsing, then they will just be preaching to the choir.</p> <p>Channeling Frida Kahlo with suitably thick quarantined eyebrows from her Swiss Chalet-like home in Manali, Kangana Ranaut has stated with a straight face that she is okay with people being shot to death, if they are attacking doctors and essential service providers. Yeah, straight away shot to death, not tear-gassed or water-cannoned or shot in the leg. She also called such people mullahs and secular media. And said people can call her a Nazi if they like. And asked the government to shut down Twitter and start its own micro-blogging site (Quitter? Litter? Bootlicker?). And ended by wishing all viewers a Happy Lockdown, like we are celebrating some festival over here.</p> <p>I have taken this particularly hard because I like Kangana. I like her acting, feminism, her amazing style, her doggedly learned English, her stance against nepotism in Bollywood and the fact that she had no godfather. But now, she seems to be soliciting a godfather with a vengeance. Becoming the latest Bhagwa Babe will make ever-pliant Bollywood cower before her for sure, but it will happen at the cost of being thought-controlled by the BJP and compromising on the individualist, feminist and artistic ideals she so fiercely cherishes. So not worth it.</p> <p>In Lucknow, a teenage Muslim boy, whose parents say he was beaten by the police for flouting the lockdown to buy biscuits and was nursed at home because his family was afraid to flout the lockdown again, succumbed to his injuries and died. No statements condemning the act were made by the state government.</p> <p>In Palghar, two saffron-robed Hindu sadhus and their driver were beaten to death by a frenzied mob who thought they were child snatchers, as the police stood by ineffectually. The footage of this bloody outburst was gut-wrenching. Equally disturbing was the way right-wing Twitter trolls frantically tried to find a communal angle to the incident. First they alleged somebody was shouting ‘Shoaib, Shoaib’ in the video (nobody was), then they said the area was ‘missionary-infested’. Nothing stuck. Finally, they resorted to posting graphic sketches of cowering sadhus being lathi-struck by men with long beards and no mustaches. Ah, well.</p> <p>Oh, and the International Monetary Fund just announced that our growth rate is down to 1.9 per cent.</p> <p>And finally, using a peculiar orangey-pink filter and wearing fake eyelashes, Rakhi Sawant posted an impassioned speech in which she reminded us that Hindu-Muslim-Sikh-Isai are all one God’s offspring and bhai-bhai. She said people who sought to divide India were evil, and warned, with grimaces and dramatic eyebrow wriggles, that they would suffer terribly for sowing seeds of hatred.</p> <p>In these weird times, it is only fitting that Rakhi Sawant is making complete sense.</p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/04/23/lockdown-breakdown.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/04/23/lockdown-breakdown.html Thu Apr 23 18:05:55 IST 2020 time-for-a-better-world <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/04/09/time-for-a-better-world.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/4/9/31-corona.jpg" /> <p>So, my 86-year-old father, who is spending his quarantine alone in his apartment in Bengaluru—being socially distant from my tainted London/Mumbai/Delhi returned brood—just posted a picture of himself jauntily modelling an extremely trendy-looking mask improvised from a premium brand of underwear, on our family WhatsApp group.</p> <p>“Only superheroes wear their undies on the outside,” said the caption below the picture. Apparently, you push your head through one leg hole, position the crotch over your nose and mouth, then pull the rest of the undie behind your neck, give it a twist, then yank the other leg hole like a bandanna over your head.</p> <p>It gives a whole new meaning to the phrase, ‘getting your knickers in a twist’.</p> <p>These are truly dystopian times. Our planet is being stalked by a virus that attacks poor folk and prime ministers with equal and dreadful democracy. Locked down in their homes, people are oscillating between euphoria (so much free time! I made banana bread!) and despair (financial losses, fear for their loved ones) and working up a high degree of cabin fever.</p> <p>As usual, the poorest and the minorities have it the worst. Home quarantine makes no sense if you have no home, and the concept of a united “Us” against the “VirUs” is rendered moot if people ostracise essential service providers, right-wing trolls make “corona jihad” trend at #1 on Twitter, and students from the northeast get spat upon and told to go back to China.</p> <p>On the positive side, those of us privileged enough to have home, health and hand sanitiser, are relearning the concepts of perspective and gratitude. Every Facebook post is either an epiphany, an existential crisis or an ode to household help, and nature is so flattered by the sudden surge of appreciation her sunsets and flowers are getting that she is thinking of installing a Like button.</p> <p>Facebook has become one massive coaching centre, offering free tutorials in Kathak, karate, Zumba, knitting, baking, video editing, Indian classical music, guitar, painting, stand-up comedy, nail art, advanced calculus and nuclear bomb-making. Matlab, the possibilities are truly infinite. I, for one, am determined to emerge from this quarantine with three new skills mastered: hula hooping; conversing in French with street dogs; flying in my pink-checked nightie on moonless nights using only my black umbrella.</p> <p>“From scratch” has become a thing. Malaika Arora is making besan ka ladoo from scratch. Sonam Kapoor is making stir-fried tofu from scratch. Maria Goretti is making sourdough starter from scratch. People are making frothy coffee, momos and Maruti cars from scratch. And, of course, I am sure a whole lot of folks are making babies from scratch.</p> <p>This new generation will be called the Coronnials. They shall be born without fingerprints because their parents washed their hands so often, hand sanitiser shall flow in their veins instead of blood, they shall come onto their balconies like a billion Juliets at 5pm sharp every day to light candles and bang on utensils for their grey-bearded Romeo, and on low-pollution days, they shall possess the ability to see Mount Everest from India Gate.</p> <p>Speaking unironically now, I have to admit that I am positive about the post-corona world. Surely, we will gain more from this than just a rash of topical movies and web series titled Virus, Quarantine and Corona Heist.</p> <p>Surely, this incarceration has made us better, more sympathetic, more sensible people, who are capable of rising above our petty differences to preserve our beautiful and much-abused planet.</p> <p>Nature has cleaned our slate for us.</p> <p>Let us emerge from our homes holding sparkly chalks dipped in hope and love and creativity, and write something worthwhile with it.</p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/04/09/time-for-a-better-world.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/04/09/time-for-a-better-world.html Thu Apr 09 16:01:31 IST 2020 iron-men-or-feet-of-clay <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/03/26/iron-men-or-feet-of-clay.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/3/26/60-modi-covid.jpg" /> <p>&quot;If you really feel the urge to milk something, go find a cow,” read the rather terse headline of a print ad issued by a leading newspaper on March 20. Accompanied by the image of a scowling bovine, it went on to state that the publication would not carry any ad that seemed to take advantage of the panic around the coronavirus pandemic for personal or material gain. However, if the messaging was responsible, considerate and empathetic towards the situation, the publication would be more than happy to carry it.</p> <p>This came a couple of days after Arihant Mattress claimed its mattresses to be ‘anti-coronavirus’and Patanjali’s Baba Ramdev claimed that its Giloy remedy could fight the virus. Such ads have prompted the self-regulating advertising industry watchdog, Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), to issue a statement that it would be taking action against companies that make unsubstantiated and irresponsible claims.</p> <p>Every crisis is also a time of great opportunity, and there is nothing wrong with seizing that opportunity, but it cannot be denied that it is very difficult in these confusing times to figure exactly where the line between filling a genuine demand and the greed for profit or popularity begins to blur. And, there is no ASCI to regulate personal behaviour here—we have to regulate it ourselves.</p> <p>So when we compose a song or a poem on the issue, are we really trying to educate people, or just you know, hoping to go viral and score an avalanche of likes? Or, when we post a video of ourselves banging a karchi (ladle) on a thaali (plate) and yelling Go-Corona-Go, are we really thanking essential service providers from the bottom of our hearts, or are we just trying to be more-patriotic-than-thou? Or indeed, as the head of a nation or a province, when we appear on television and address the citizens who elected us, are we just competing with the heads of other nations or provinces in a stupid game of one-upmanship, again for profit or popularity, or are we genuinely trying to do the best for the people in our stewardship?</p> <p>These issues are especially tricky for celebrities—if they donate money for coronavirus relief work, people accuse them of climbing on to the bandwagon and trying to ‘buy’ good publicity. If they do not donate money, people immediately throw Rihanna’s $5 million donation in their face and ask them how they are giving back. The nicest celebrities deal with this by giving very quietly. And this, in these deafening times when we are all reeling from the sound of utensils being clanged from the rooftops, is an example worth emulating.</p> <p>Actions speak so much louder than words.</p> <p>So if you are a regular person, put down your thaali. Go inside your house and quietly give all your domestic help paid leave for the month (a real test of patriotism this one and so much more difficult than thaali-banging!) Then clean your own home like a good Gandhian, do your office work, speak up loudly and fearlessly if your leaders seem to be waffling about, and for heaven’s sake, refrain from forwarding weird WhatsApp messages from opportunistic godmen clearly out to get famous.</p> <p>If you are an elected representative, and human enough to want to shine during this crisis not just for the sake of the people who elected you but also for your own profit/popularity, know that this is the best shot at immortality you will ever get. Steer India through this crisis sincerely, with minimum economic and human loss, resist the urge to milk the situation, and you will have created a legacy far greater than the one that could be earned by raising an 182m statue of Sardar Patel, building a temple to Lord Ram at Ayodhya, or indeed, redoing Delhi’s Central Vista at the cost of Rs20,000 crore.</p> <p>That is called having your milk, and drinking it, too.</p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/03/26/iron-men-or-feet-of-clay.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/03/26/iron-men-or-feet-of-clay.html Mon Mar 30 19:50:54 IST 2020 show-offs-to-stay-home <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/03/13/show-offs-to-stay-home.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/3/13/72-Show-offs-to-stay-home-new.jpg" /> <p>Phew, thank God for the coronavirus. Usually, I dread the summer vacations because everybody I know posts pictures of their holidays abroad, you know—with the Colosseum or the Eiffel Tower or some random Trump Tower in the background, and pretentious hashtags that sound like the names of SUVs in the foreground—#Gypsy #Wanderer #Vagabond. Which is ridiculous because show me one legit vagabond or gypsy who can fill out all the mind-numbing, hair-splitting details demanded by a Schengen Visa form?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Or, their pics featuring beach resorts in Spain and France, where they click close-ups of their sandy toes, or the beads in their hair with hashtags like #sunkissed #tangledhairdontcare and #beachbum. Which is even more ridiculous because which Indian likes or needs to be sun-kissed or tangled or to have dusty feet? We get all that for free right here at home! And, you can be sure that the women in those pics are going to head straight into the arms of their regular therapists at their beauty parlour once they are back, who will coo and tsk-tsk over them and immediately prescribe a de-tanning-facial-mani-pedi-hair-spa marathon.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But the expensive holiday hashtags that really get me triggered are the humblebrag ones, like #famjam #qualitytime and #OGgang, kyunki, if all you wanted to do was bond with the OG gang then you could have invited them all home only for quality conversation, biryani and beer on your balcony, no? You could have turned on the fairy lights, put a nice Spotify playlist, played Monopoly and just hung out. You did not go all the way to the freaking Kruger National Park to #famjam. You went there to #showoff #flaunt #taunt #suckitupcheapos.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So, coming back to the coronavirus, I am really sorry that so many people have died and so many are suffering terribly, but I am also really glad that so many more people have been grounded. Thanks to Covid-19, they can no longer go stomping all over the world causing a pandemic of heartburn, envy and competitive conspicuous consumption. And cash-strapped, under-pressure people like me can give a light, rueful laugh and say: “We had to cancel our tickets to Italy and Korea at the last minute, can you imagine? It’s too sad ya, and we lost two L on the deal, and the kids are devastated, but what to do, safety first, no?”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Hopefully, it is going to be a quiet, low-cost summer of staying in, reading, Swiggy-ing, Nexflix-ing and video-gaming. Perhaps, the grounded brigade will even do the whole become-a-tourist-in-your-own-city thing! We do tend to overlook our local attractions: I was part of the One Show ad-festival jury in New York once, and when they took us on a Liberty Island cruise, we found out that none of the New Yorkers on our jury had ever seen the Statue of Liberty before, though all of us international jurors had.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So, hopefully, desi tourism will get a boost. People will queue up to visit Qutab Minar or the Gateway of India, or walk through Cubbon Park in the early morning and rediscover the beauty of their own cities.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Or maybe not. I hear that people whose international travel plans have been foiled because of the coronavirus have now been bitten by conspicuous consumption vulgaris. They are rushing out and buying cars and jewellery in order to prove that even though they are holed up at home for the summer, they still have money to burn.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Luckily, I have an answer all prepared for this. If anybody asks me, “Oh, why you didn’t buy any nice jewellery this summer, ya?”, I am going to glibly tell them: “I can’t pull out and spend more than fifty thou tops ya, because all my money is in Yes Bank, na.”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/03/13/show-offs-to-stay-home.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/03/13/show-offs-to-stay-home.html Fri Mar 13 12:13:15 IST 2020 delhi-punishment-for-picking-love <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/02/28/delhi-punishment-for-picking-love.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/2/28/56-Delhi-punishment-for-picking-love-new.jpg" /> <p>Last fortnight, buoyed by the Delhi election verdict, I wrote what now seems to be a naïve piece about how the forces of communalism had been dispelled. I gushed that Dilliwallas had proved that the ‘dil’ in Dilli was still beating strong and ended by wishing everyone a Happy Valentine’s Day. Pretty dumb, huh.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Tonight, as I write this, mayhem is descending over Delhi. The images being beamed on TV seem as horrific as anything we saw in 2002 or 1984. It seems pretty clear, to me at least, that these are images of a city that is being punished. Punished for voting as it did. Punished for rejecting a hate-monger like Kapil Mishra, who now feels the need to regain lost face by making provocative remarks at a rally that led to pro-CAA protesters descending on Delhi’s streets. Punished exactly how Parvesh Verma promised we would be if we chose an option that is not the BJP—“tomorrow, if people enter your homes and rape your sisters and daughters, don’t ask Modiji to save you.” Punished for choosing love and development over hate and unemployment.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Tonight is a night of conspiracy theories. The Muslims/Pakistanis/Urban Naxals are flexing to make Modi look small during Trump’s visit. There seems to be a schism in the BJP with a more militant faction frantic to show, while the world’s media is in town, how brilliantly the Gujarat model has been reproduced across India. It’s all the doing of the Congress. It is being done to declare President’s rule and kick out the pesky Kejriwal. Pick whatever option suits your confirmation bias. What is clear is that communal forces are far from being dispelled.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In Bengaluru, young Amulya Leona Norohna has been charged with sedition for chanting ‘Pakistan Zindabad’. The fact that she was trying to make the point that we should wish all nations zindabad and none murdabad is lost on a country that has been hopelessly polarised. Amulya has been arrested, but the Sri Ram Sena, which issued a Hindu fatwa (a bhagwa sounds like an appropriate branding for it) to people to kill her and receive a bounty of Rs10 lakh, has not even been chastised yet.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Across India, communal fault-lines have been stoked, and anti-CAA protesters, despite being goaded, have struggled to stay non-violent because they know that the moment they raise their voice, news channels will beam out images, screaming, “See! See! Muslim terror!” But after 60 days of blatant baiting, a man allegedly called Shahrukh may have finally provided the riot-porn image that will make the wet dreams of the communalists come true.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The Trump tamasha has wound up with no concrete trade deal, but at least the Rs130 crore we spent resulted in some good optics. Trump got to strut on stage before 1.2 lakh people to the deathless lyrics—Macho macho man, ready to get down with anyone he can! The trio stood with devoutness before Gandhi’s charkha for photographs, and then the happy couple posed before the Taj Mahal, the Monument of Love. And, Melania was seen visiting a Delhi government school to study the Happiness Project, even as schools in North East Delhi stayed shut. Mutton biryani and malpua was consumed at the Rashtrapati Bhavan banquet, and I am guessing the two Neroes chatted cosily about whether John Oliver is a lower life form than Kunal Kamra and how award standards have fallen so abysmally (Best Picture Oscar for a Korean film? Nobel for Abhijeet Banerjee? McGill Medal for Rana Ayyub?).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Meanwhile we, the people of Delhi, remember the optics from Gujarat 2002 and shudder. And then comfort ourselves with the thought that Qutubuddin Ansari and Ashok Mochi, the subjects of the two riot-porn images that went viral then, met peacefully 17 years later to inaugurate Ashok’s chappal shop and state that their emotions had been stoked by communal forces.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Democracy and better sense will, eventually, triumph in India.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/02/28/delhi-punishment-for-picking-love.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/02/28/delhi-punishment-for-picking-love.html Fri Feb 28 14:49:05 IST 2020 love-not-lotus-blooms-in-delhi <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/02/14/love-not-lotus-blooms-in-delhi.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/2/14/41-Love-not-lotus-blooms-in-Delhi-new.jpg" /> <p>I will be honest, it has sucked to be a Delhiite in recent times. Because no matter where you go in India or the world, you are sneered at for hailing from what is known either as the ‘rape capital of India’ or the ‘pollution capital of the world’. One does try to talk weakly about our amazing markets, awesome food and ancient monuments, but ‘what can you even see in that ghastly smog?’ and ‘where can you shop? There are molesters everywhere’ shut us up. Because, after all, these are good and valid points.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And, in the last month, as the battle for the capital got darker and dirtier and more desperate, as the peaceful protests against the National Register of Indian Citizens were demonised, as Home Minister Amit Shah spoke of pressing the lotus button so hard that it delivered a ‘currant’ in Shaheen Bagh, as the Delhi Police turned on the very students and citizens it is paid to protect, as Agent Adityanath arrived to stir the communal pot with talk of biryani and bullets, as brainwashed young men waved guns and spouted propaganda, as MP Parvesh Verma told us that the Shaheen Bagh ‘gang’ (who, by the way, are 80 per cent women) was going to rape our daughters and sisters and Modiji was the only PM who cared enough about us to save them, as #DilliMeinDangay trended on Twitter, it seemed it might earn another title for itself—hate capital of India.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The louder the politicians got, the quieter the electorate became. Ominously quiet. Nobody knew what the silence meant.</p> <p>And then came the story of a ‘Jai Sri Ram’ shouting mob from a pro-NRC rally forcing its way into a prominent Delhi girls college—Gargi College—during their annual festival, Reverie. While the mob gawked, groped, fondled and masturbated at the horrified girls, the principal attempted to hush up the matter, but thankfully the students proved to be way too gutsy and vexingly non-sanskaari, and would not sit quiet and hush when told to do so. Willy-nilly, the news spread through the city.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Forty hours later, Delhi went to the polls.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>‘A fight for India’s soul’ was a phrase used to describe the Lok Sabha 2019 elections, and it was used yet again for the Delhi assembly polls. The turnout started out low, but then Delhiites are notorious for being fashionably late. By 6pm, a healthy 60-plus percentage had been achieved.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The moment the exit polls went on air, and it seemed that the Aam Aadmi Party was headed for a landslide victory, various tame anchors started to shame Delhiites for prioritising practical, mundane ‘selfish’ things like water, electricity, health and education over ‘noble’ issues like the nation’s safety and unity, terrorism and clamping down on the (80 per cent female) rapists in Shaheen Bagh. This was right in tune with the earlier BJP-driven narrative where giving up your gas subsidy or standing in line to exchange your old currency for new was seen as an honour and a duty by every patriotic Indian citizen.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But this is Delhi. We are... er... shameless. And also quite openly selfish.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The message we have sent out, which hopefully has delivered a ‘currant’ right into the thalamus of the BJP lotus, is loud and clear—less Ram, more kaam, thank you very much!</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And with a thumping victory for the performance-driven record of the AAP (62 of 70 seats) and a resounding rejection of the politics of hate and vitriol as practised in this election by the BJP, I am, once again, proud to be a Dilliwaali.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Three days before what Asaram Bapu calls Matru-Pitru Pujan Diwas and the rest of the world calls the Festival of Love, our ancient, canny, blunt, profane, practical capital has rejected hate, chosen love and put the dil right back into Dilli. Happy Valentine’s Day, everybody!</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/02/14/love-not-lotus-blooms-in-delhi.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/02/14/love-not-lotus-blooms-in-delhi.html Fri Feb 14 11:31:16 IST 2020 amit-shah-bitter-lemonade <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/01/31/amit-shah-bitter-lemonade.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/1/31/51-Amit-Shah-bitter-lemonade-new.jpg" /> <p>Because India is a country of many languages, because illiteracy is so rampant and connectivity such a challenge, it is very, very hard for an idea or a person to become truly, legitimately, grassroots-level famous here. For an individual, nationwide fame happens only if they do something radical, like win the nation its independence from the British, or win India its first cricket World Cup, or its first Nobel prize, or its first Miss Universe title or an Olympic medal or become the first world famous porn star of Indian descent. Similarly, an idea can only grab the nation’s imagination if it is strong, simple, goosebumpy and if insane amounts of money is pumped into making sure the entire country gets to hear of it.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The good part is that once a person or idea achieves this level of fame and acceptance, it is very, very hard for them/it to be dislodged from the nation’s consciousness. They become as rock-solid as Rajnikanth. Or, as the notion that nighties are acceptable out-of-home attire if teamed with a dupatta. Or, as the concept of unity-in-diversity—a blast from the past that we thought was dead but which now seems to be making a comeback as strong as a Rocky sequel.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The shortcut to achieving this level of fame instantly is to piggyback onto the people or ideas who/that have already established themselves at this mega level. If it is a person, you could kill or marry them or shamelessly appropriate their legacy (Nathuram Godse, Mira Rajput and the Sardar Patel statue are all good examples). If it is an idea, you can somehow pervert it, subvert it or give it a major spin and thus grab the nation’s eyeballs.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>This is something that political parties, especially the BJP’s PR machinery, understand well. Again and again, they identify the strong, simple symbols and ideas closest to the nation’s heart, give them a spin and then hammer those twisted version into our national psyche with their massive media spends.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And so, concepts as ubiquitous as Lord Ram, cows, momos, Muslims, Pakistan, soldiers, 11,000 note, gas cylinders and famous universities have all been perverted and piggy-backed upon. If Modi is a chaiwala, Amit Shah is a nimbu pani waala. The man possesses the undeniable gift of taking the lemons life deals him with and turning them into lemonade. Uri turned into surgical strikes, Pulwama into Balakot, JNU into tukde-tukde gang, ‘Chowkidar Chor Hai’ turned into #MainBhiChowkidar, the crappy economy turned into Bangladeshi-immigrants-stealing-your-jobs, and right now, he is busily trying to turn the Shaheen Bagh protest into a BJP victory in Delhi.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The top hashtags on Twitter as I write this are #370inShaheenBagh and #SurgicalstrikeinShaheenbagh—rabid saffron trolls are screaming for these measures, which a government would use against a national enemy, to be employed against citizens of India indulging in peaceful, Gandhi-style satyagraha. Sinister conspiracies abound—about a den of terrorists plotting mayhem and murder, about brainwashed children marching to jihadi tunes, about a paid rate of 1700 a day and a plateful of biryani. The master himself is busily stirring the pot, trying to activate ancient fault lines, telling Delhiites that 30 per cent of them are Hindu immigrants from Pakistan, and that Shaheen Bagh is a horror that must be clamped down upon by pressing the button on the Lotus on poll day.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But what he has not factored in is that India, in its infancy, was nursed and nourished on the idea of Hindu-Muslim-Sikh-Isai. Unity-in-diversity is our soul food, our oldest and most goosebumpy idea, our dearest collective memory, the mother’s milk we were all fed. And every movie-going Indian knows that you cannot mess with that.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Coupled with the bijli, pani, education and health that Kejriwal has delivered, this mother’s milk may yet prove more delicious to Delhiites than a lemonade of hate.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/01/31/amit-shah-bitter-lemonade.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/01/31/amit-shah-bitter-lemonade.html Fri Jan 31 11:08:41 IST 2020 wake-up-and-smell-the-vagina <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/01/17/wake-up-and-smell-the-vagina.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/1/17/28-Wake-up-and-smell-the-vagina-new.jpg" /> <p>Overheard at a party recently. A drunken gent talking to an attractive woman, who seems to be in her mid-thirties.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“Kya yaar, where-where you keep going to protest and what-what you keep on posting on social media nowadays? Be careful! You will get into trouble.”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The woman tells her boozy well-wisher that he should not worry about her and that she is perfectly at peace with what she is doing.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But he is far from convinced.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“My dear, I worry about you. Why do you want to be at cross-purposes with the powers-that-be?”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>She tells him that she finds she can no longer keep her frustrations with what is happening in the country to herself, and adds, with an ironic eye roll, that maybe she is just having a mid-life crisis.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“Arrey!”He stares at her, shocked, then offers what (to him) is clearly extremely obvious advice: “If you are having a mid-life crisis then just do some ‘adultery-shadultery’, na! Why are you protesting?”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>That is a question more and more women are being asked this month. From the girls in Jamia to the old ladies reciting shayari at Shaheen Bagh, to JNU president Aishe Ghosh, wearing her injuries like a badge of honour, to Deepika Padukone, so somber and black-clad and incredibly beautiful as she stood side-by-side with peacefully protesting students at JNU, to the students of Jyoti Nivas (Girls) College in Bengaluru who stood up to BJP workers. The surprise, the disapproval and the entitlement is clear in the manner in which they address the women.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“Heroines should stay in Mumbai and dance,” said a BJP MLA from Madhya Pradesh of Deepika’s JNU visit, clearly having forgotten the fact that Smriti Irani, Hema Malini and Kirron Kher are MPs from his party. Or, maybe this is his real grudge—that heroines are trickling out of Mumbai and grabbing positions meant only to go to ‘real’politicians. Who knows?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“This is nothing to do with you or your principal. We have spoken directly to the owners of your college. You focus on your studies, please. It is none of your business,” said a bunch of BJP workers to students from Jyoti Nivas college who protested against a pro-Citizenship Amendment Act banner that the men had displayed prominently across the main gate of their campus. The streets are no place for women. They do not understand politics. Why are they talking so loudly? Why have they left their homes and hearths? Why are they here at all?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Perhaps the most worrying are the women of Shaheen Bagh, who even brought in the New Year sipping tea and singing songs of protest and the national anthem at their protest site. They have inspired similar sit-ins in Gaya in Bihar and Park Circus in Kolkata. Female bonding—that powerful, dangerous thing—is rippling out and flexing its muscles all over the country. It is a heady time to be a woman with passion and an opinion in India today. Far more heady than ‘adultery-shadultery’ certainly.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Over in the weird, weird west, Gwyneth Paltrow, who, for all her projected ditziness, possesses a large amount of entrepreneurial canniness, has perhaps felt these cosmic vibrations, and been moved to launch a scented candle called ‘This Smells Like My Vagina.’ It claims to be made with “geranium, citrusy bergamot and cedar absolutes juxtaposed with damask rose and ambrette seed”, and possesses “a funny, gorgeous, sexy and beautifully unexpected scent”. It is priced at $75, and looks like it will burn for approximately three hours.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The candle has sold out already. Gwyneth, yet again, seems to have cashed in on the mood of the times. Clearly, it is time for people to wake up and smell the vagina.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/01/17/wake-up-and-smell-the-vagina.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/01/17/wake-up-and-smell-the-vagina.html Fri Jan 17 12:53:24 IST 2020 four-words-against-fascism <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/01/03/four-words-against-fascism.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2020/1/3/22-Four-words-against-fascism-new.jpg" /> <p>You can always judge how organic a protest is by the kind of placards and banners people carry to it. If it is genuinely spontaneous and representative of a legitimate ground swell, its slogans will be varied, witty and original. And if it is a ‘bought’ crowd (strange how bought rhymes with bot), the slogans will seem on-the-nose, mass-produced and bland—sort of untouched-by-human-hand.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>You know where I am going with this, don’t you? In the protests we have been seeing in city after city through the second half of December, the pro CAA+NRC+NPR rally placards have seemed robotic, while the anti ones have been evocative—Hindustan kisi ke baap ka nahi hai (Hindustan does not belong to anyone’s father), Hum kagaz nahi dikhaenge (We will not show our papers), The cow ate my documents, Hindu-Muslim raazi, toh kya karega Nazi (If Hindus and Muslims unite, what can the Nazi do). But the one that summed up the prevailing zeitgeist, for me at least, was the straightforward, pithy and extremely exasperated ‘Hindu hoon, chutiya nahi’ (I am a Hindu, not a dumbfuck).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>What a slogan! A slogan that can bring an entire ideology to its knees. I would have congratulated whoever came up with it, but its canny creator was smart enough to not own up to it. Perhaps, because of the brutal backlash peaceful protesters are facing in Uttar Pradesh or even because of ominous, passive-aggressive tweets like this one from the Bengaluru police on December 20: “Dear citizens, we are watching and storing every provoke posts, Please beware of spreading hatred for you own good.”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Putting aside the Bengaluru police’s execrable grammar and the ugliness unfolding in UP for the time being, let us delve deeper into this wonderful slogan, reminiscent in a way of the title of the 2010 film My Name Is Khan, in which Shah Rukh Khan (shamefully silent on this burning issue) proudly proclaims his Muslim identity, but disassociates from all jihadist ideology by repeating, “My name is Khan and I am not a terrorist”. The anti-NRC slogan equally proudly proclaims its Hindu identity, but refuses to be incorporated into the lunatic saffron fringe, by saying (I am personalising this to my name, feel free to do so with yours), ‘My name is Chauhan and I am not a chutiya’.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In the hit Avengers series, seriously messed up arch-villain Thanos murders half the people in the universe to solve a scarcity of resources. This is the same ‘solution’ hate-mongers have hit upon, arguing that if we get rid of all the ‘outsiders’ there will be resources enough for all of us—Hindus, Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs. It is good to see that kids as young as 18-year-old Sana Ganguly are clear-sighted enough to recognise this for the bullshit genocidal blame-gaming it is; to spot that there is no economic growth and no jobs not because the Muslims have stolen them, but because the government has not created any; and that it is, in fact, wrecking our economy at an epic level, and then dicking around with our national data and democratic institutions to cover up the hideous mess it has made.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The Muslim bogey, Pakistan bogey and the illegal alien bogey are finally being recognised for what they are. Students, thinkers and the intelligentsia—in the absence of any strong political leadership or Bollywood fire—are doing an admirable job of disseminating this recognition to the general public, which is not as privileged and educated as themselves, through slogans like my new favourite.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>2019 has been a depressing year for people who care for the idea of India, but it seems to be ending with a bang. Tsunamis often strike in late December. When we think the year is all dusted and done, a national epiphany of ‘Hindu hoon, chutiya nahi’ could well be the game-changing tidal wave all genuinely patriotic Indians have been waiting for.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/01/03/four-words-against-fascism.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2020/01/03/four-words-against-fascism.html Fri Jan 03 14:37:55 IST 2020 will-the-real-police-stand-up <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/12/20/will-the-real-police-stand-up.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/12/20/76-Will-the-real-police-stand-up-new.jpg" /> <p><b>SOMETHING STRANGE</b> is going on in central Bengaluru. As commuters intermittently cursed, weaved, honked and crawled through traffic along the choked streets of the “garden” city last week, belt-less in their cars and helmet-less on their two-wheelers, they were forced to pull to a screaming halt at the sight of a very fit and fair-complexioned traffic policeman, wearing orange-glow jackets, aviator glasses and a pollution mask, one hand raised commandingly over his (her?) head.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>On closer inspection, this groovy Dabangg-like vision turned out to be a dummy. The Bengaluru Police have actually acquired thirty such dummies and are placing them at intersections where the traffic is thick and the misdemeanours many. The expectation is that the commuters, speeding along merrily, will see what they assume is a traffic policeman on duty, and immediately remember to be good drivers.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>To further confound commuters, Bengaluru Police cunningly keep shuffling the mannequins in vans, from one intersection to the other. So just when you have started to relax and think, “hah, that is a dummy scarecrow cop, do they think that I am a crow?” and jump the red light, the plastic policeman turns out to be a real one, and bam, you have been handed a ticket.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The police have also started a rumour that some of these dummies have cameras in their eyes that record your every move, so even if they are dummies, the real dummy could still be you. Several real, retired cops have rubbished the move, albeit anonymously: “It will make people think that the police lie and are bound to be stupid. They will no longer take us seriously. People have already started posting selfies with these dummies, smiling, pointing and hugging them in a manner which is distinctly disrespectful. We will become a joke if this continues.”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In a fortnight when the police have been so much in the news, first for their tardiness in reacting to the Hyderabad vet rape case, then for shooting down the four accused as they allegedly tried to escape, and then for their role in the student protests in Delhi and the northeast, I find the plastic policemen of Bengaluru, standing sinisterly about the street corners, faceless, unfeeling, deaf and dumb, disquietingly representative of our police force in general.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>They turn a deaf ear to you when you come in pleading for assistance. “Come back after you get raped,” the cops in Unnao allegedly told a young woman recently. But they smoothly switch to life when activated by the powers that be, thrashing, tear-gassing and opening actual fire on peacefully protesting students or “escaping” rape accused with impunity.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Many have invoked the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 to describe the ghastly other-ing that is taking place in our country right now. One of the key symptoms of that time was how automaton-like and alienated from regular folk the keepers of the law became.What must it be like to be a policeman today? Torn between the sexy, aviator-wearing, much-fetishised prototype of macho characters who gun down proven rapists with powerful connections, or the lobotomised, eager-to-please, selectively outraged prototype as seems to be flourishing under the ministry of home affairs nowadays?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>To me, the Bengaluru mannequins seem to have adopted the worst traits of both varieties. A thinking, empowered police force, made entirely of flesh and blood, decently paid, highly motivated, gender-sensitised and politically neutral is the need of the hour, not a bunch of mentally-defunct, fair &amp; lovely plastic dummies.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/12/20/will-the-real-police-stand-up.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/12/20/will-the-real-police-stand-up.html Fri Dec 20 18:08:26 IST 2019 bollywood-changing-storylines <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/11/22/bollywood-changing-storylines.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/11/22/69-Bollywood-changing-storylines-new.jpg" /> <p>One only has to compare the handsome, heroic, syncretic Akbar from Jodhaa Akbar (2008) played by Hrithik Roshan, with the animalistic, fur-robed, blood-thirsty Ahmad Shah Abdali played by Sanjay Dutt in Panipat (2019), to see how much Oscar nominated director Ashutosh Gowariker has ‘evolved’ as a filmmaker, and how much we, the people of India, have ‘matured’ as an audience over the last 11 years.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The fact that this clearly biased film is releasing on December 6, the date of the demolition of the Babri Masjid, cannot possibly be a coincidence. It is just one more telltale sign that Bollywood—and even top-notch directors now fallen upon hard times with three flop films in a row—have no issues with pandering to the lowest common denominator, and in fact will do so with full gusto and an untroubled conscience, as long as it pays them rich dividends at the box office.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But why pick on just poor Gowariker? There is also Ajay Devgn’s Ffilms (no, that’s not a spelling mistake, it’s a numerologically propitious spelling.) Ya, so this Ffilm company has just released the trailer of Tanhaji, featuring Saif Ali Khan as a rajput general in the employ of the Mughals, taking on a righteous, strapping Devgn. Tanhaji is full of all the in-vogue tropes, you know lots of har-har-Mahadeving and talk of restoring the good old days when the bhagwa (saffron) flag fluttered over the happy homeland. Tanhaji’s wife, played by Devgn’s IRL wife, the purportedly woke Kajol, even mouths a dialogue about how, with hubby dear in charge, ‘the sacred threads of brahmins and the veils on the heads of women will remain safely in place’. Basically, she endorses the caste system and the subjugation of women in one crisp, block-buster ensuring sentence. Kajol! Our sweet, sorted Anjali from Chandni Chowk, who in the good old days when the Raichands were ruling the box-office and life was all Khushi and minimum Ghum, used to sing quawaalis at the wedding of her Muslim bestie!</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It is all just too depressing.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And even if you look away from these cookie-cutter mythologicals, there is not much joy to be had. Just look at Pati, Patni Aur Woh, which is riding the other big wave surging through Bollywood currently, ie rampant misogyny. This one features popular heartthrob Kartik Aaryan making a comment that seeks to normalise marital rape. Thankfully, the comment got slammed so hard on Twitter that the makers of the film have had to remove it.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But my point here is that Bollywood is not full of fools. They are all highly intelligent people with huge entourages full of advisers, media-managers, financiers and strategists. They do a lot of research. So if stars appear on screen making statements valorising regressive thinking, it is not happening by mistake. It is happening on purpose. Kajol is endorsing a sacred thread and a ghoonghat knowingly, on purpose. Aaryan is bemoaning a man who extorts sex from his wife being called balatkari, on purpose. Gowariker is releasing his film on December 6 on purpose, with his eyes wide open.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So what do we do about this? Aaryan’s rumoured love interest, the very sensible Sara Ali Khan, said recently that we should not go to watch such films. If we do not go, then Bollywood will stop making them. Which, of course, is true.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But Bollywood is not just a mode of entertainment. It is, in this country still besieged with ignorance and prejudice, also a medium of education. Which is something that Gowariker, back in his heyday, when he directed Lagaan (2001), Jodhaa Akbar and especially the genuinely patriotic and idealistic Swades (2004), seemed to understand.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Maybe somebody should sit him down and run him through a retrospective of his own cinema.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/11/22/bollywood-changing-storylines.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/11/22/bollywood-changing-storylines.html Sat Nov 23 16:11:28 IST 2019 halloweens-win-over-dated-politics <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/11/09/halloweens-win-over-dated-politics.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/11/9/54Halloween.jpg" /> <p>I remember that a few years ago, there was a not-so-subtle move by the freshly anointed BJP government to declare December 25 as Good Governance Day in honour of former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. People were instructed to come to work and effectively ignore the other famous birthday boy.</p> <p>Before you could say Subtle Bihari, India was up in arms. Christians or non-Christians, all of us love our kitschy Christmas celebrations, complete with cotton-wool bearded creepy Santas, mawa plum cake, gota-decorated trees, and the licence to lurk outside churches and (maybe) get to kiss pretty girls on both cheeks.</p> <p>There have been small communal skirmishes when Holi comes up during Ramzan—Surf Excel even made a rather nice ad about a small girl getting herself drenched with colour to protect an even smaller Muslim boy, so he can reach the mosque without getting colour on his clothes— but the next biggest tussle for the ownership of meaningful dates happens on October 31.</p> <p>Indira Gandhi was assassinated on this date in New Delhi in 1984. Almost 100 years before that, in 1875, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was born on the same date in Nadiad, Gujarat. Back in the day when the Congress was calling the shots, pictures of all the leaders, sombre and crisp in white, cotton kurta-pyjamas or saris, paying homage to the slain leader would dominate the front page. Now, we see images of the entire BJP pantheon flagging off Unity runs, and the prime minister laying flowers at the feet of the Patel statue that was built at a cost of Rs2,989 crore, purportedly in the virtuous cause of celebrating the legacy of the Iron Man of India (but perhaps also in the not-so-virtuous cause of obliterating the memory of Mrs Gandhi’s ‘sacrifice’.)</p> <p>The Congress deals with this blatant appropriation of both the date as well as of Sardar Patel, who despised the RSS and was a staunch Congressman, by saying that the BJP has no leaders of stature of its own and therefore has to appropriate the Congress’s. But this is just a case of making nimbu-pani because life served you nimbus.</p> <p>This year, another event of major significance happened on October 31—Jammu and Kashmir ceased to be a state and was bifurcated into the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Surely this is an event of major import and Kashmiris everywhere will probably want their children to remember the date.</p> <p>But I think they are all fighting a losing battle. Because India—or rather rich and upper middle class India, which is all that seems to matter to our politicians nowadays—voted NOTA on all these contenders for ownership of October 31. Today, thanks to social media connectivity, rampant wannabe-ness and the supremacy of American popular culture, October 31 belongs, not to Mrs Gandhi or to Sardar Patel or to the newly birthed UTs, but only to Halloween.</p> <p>Pint-sized spooks, bhoots, zombies and witches have been ringing my doorbell all night, screaming trick or treat. Their fake American accents stirred up the slumbering Sri Ram Sena bhakt that I did not know I was housing inside my pseudo-liberal soul. So I gave them a snarky lecture on Indian culture and booted them out empty-handed.</p> <p>“Come around for Lohri or Eidi, and maybe I’ll give you something,” I said, as I banged the door shut in their faces.</p> <p>“What’s that?” I heard them whisper to each other.</p> <p>“Ask your parents!” I yelled. “Or, at least come back next year dressed as a desi monster—perhaps a random politician!”</p> <p>“Mean auntie! Cheap auntie!” They chorused loudly and scampered away.</p> <p>Yeah.</p> <p>Forget Rashtriya Sankalp Diwas or Rashtriya Ekta Diwas, Happy Halloween, everyone.</p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/11/09/halloweens-win-over-dated-politics.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/11/09/halloweens-win-over-dated-politics.html Sat Nov 09 12:27:14 IST 2019 redefining-winning-and-losing <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/10/25/redefining-winning-and-losing.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/10/25/56-Redefining-winning-and-losing-new.jpg" /> <p>It is so good that all of Bollywood showed up at Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s residence to discuss how to include Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophies in their films. The people who said the footage from the function looked like hostage videos released by kidnappers are just being mean. Didn’t Shah Rukh Khan describe the event as ‘very nice’? The fact that his usual choice of adjectives is awesome, tremendous, mind-blowing cannot possibly mean anything.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Then there was another bunch of cynics who said that Bollywood-flexing plus Pakistan-bombing is something our government does to ensure success before every election. Last time, it was ‘Rendezvous with Akshay Kumar’ plus Balakot, where we reportedly killed about 250-300 JeM militants. This time, it was Selfie-with-Shah Rukh-Aamir plus the artillery attack in the Neelam valley where we reportedly killed at least five Pakistani soldiers.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But I choose not to be cynical. I think the government is genuine in its professed desire to embrace the learnings of Gandhiji. And I will tell you why I am so sure. It is because they want to award a Bharat Ratna to Veer Savarkar.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Matlab, didn’t Gandhiji say embrace those who hate you, turn the other cheek and so on? Yeah, so he would have probably approved the fact that the man who popularised the term hindutva, who was passionately in favour of the two-nation theory and against the concept of a democratic, secular India that Gandhi died defending (some say at the hands of the disciples of this Savarkar) should be awarded a Bharat Ratna by a nation that the Mahatma is the father of (or at least used to be, till United States President Donald Trump declared his friend Modiji ‘Father of India’).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The fact that Savarkar, while imprisoned in the Andamans, wrote a grovelling letter to the British, whining about being caned and pleading for clemency and swore not to indulge in any revolutionary activities once released, could only have endeared him to Gandhiji, who loved the weak and the frail passionately. Gandhiji taught us to disdain the glittering people at the top and embrace the losers, and this government is doing precisely that.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Look no further than their admirably unimpressed attitude when it comes to ‘winners’. They have made it quite clear to Abhijit Banerjee that they are not to gush over him obsequiously just because he won a Nobel prize. They are way too Gandhian for that—never mind that Abhijit’s economic policies are actually policies that Gandhiji might have approved whole-heartedly of! And just before Abhijit, there was Ravish Kumar, whose Ramon Magsaysay award for journalism, went unacknowledged by Modiji—another admirable display of the Gandhian philosophy of not kowtowing to winners at work.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And then look at the tenderness with which the government treats the ones who were relatively unsuccessful. Like Abhinandan Varthaman, an IAF pilot who downed a Pakistani F-16, got shot down across the LoC, was captured by the Pakistanis and made to record a statement praising their treatment of him. Other governments might have berated him for this ‘failure’—even Modiji’s friend Trump had to say this about John McCain: “He is a war hero because he was captured. I like people that were not captured.’ But this government, being a true Gandhian, declared Abhinandan a hero, put his pictures on its campaign posters and awarded him a Vir Chakra.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>They did the same with Indian Space Research Organisation director K. Sivan after the unsuccessful moon landing. Modiji himself took Sivan to his bosom in a heart-breaking, internet-breaking hug that silenced all criticism and ushered in a deluge of ISRO-loving tweets from the entire nation.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>We are truly living in an India where winning is losing and losing is winning. Isn’t it (to use Shah Rukh Khan’s adjective) ‘very nice’?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/10/25/redefining-winning-and-losing.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/10/25/redefining-winning-and-losing.html Fri Oct 25 11:31:31 IST 2019 look-who-openly-defecating <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/10/12/look-who-openly-defecating.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/10/12/35-Look-who-openly-defecating-new.jpg" /> <p>Recently, I read in the papers with great interest (but without any surprise, because nothing I read in the papers surprises me anymore) that apparently our country in now open-defecation free. Thanks to the hard work done by the prime minister’s Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, we are now 110 million latrines richer! In fact, all 1.3 billion of us have been toilet-trained in five years flat. That is efficiency for you!</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Of course, there is a bunch of naysayers out there saying that just building latrines is not enough. They are asking if these latrines are actually being used? Do they even have water supply? Are they being maintained properly? How is the sludge being disposed of? Has there been any improvement in our infectious disease and groundwater statistics since we became open-defecation free?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But nobody is interested in such anti-national questions. All good, toilet-trained Indians are praising the prime minister’s brilliant Swachh Bharat Mission, which won him a doughnut-shaped, rainbow-hued Global Goalkeeper award from the Gates Foundation—a trophy he can line up right next to the 110 million shiny, white latrines, which are also trophies of a sort, being for show only.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The truth on the ground is that very soon after our prime minister was awarded his multi-coloured doughnut, two young dalit children were beaten to death by upper caste men for defecating in the open in Shivpuri, Madhya Pradesh. Journalists reported that far from being open-defecation free, most houses in Shivpuri do not have any toilets at all.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Open defecation, you see, is still rampant in India. Not only in the literal sense, as done by the two hapless little dalit children, but also in the metaphorical sense. Because we live in a society where our elected leaders are openly taking a dump on us every day—on our Constitution, our human rights, our liberty, our history, our democracy, our forests and our nation.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>This open defecation (and desecration) is happening, as defecation normally does—on a daily basis. Regular as clockwork. Sometimes even, if the state has indigestion, several times a day! It has become completely normalised.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>When a perfectly legal and entirely constructive letter, written out of concern for the state of the nation, results in sedition charges being slapped on you, that is open defecation on our liberty.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>When we are told that the ordinary people in Kashmir are perfectly happy living in what has become virtually an open prison, that is open defecation on our intelligence.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>When our home minister says that all Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Jain refugees will not have to leave the country, that they will get Indian citizenship and enjoy all the rights of an Indian national, then the deliberate and glaring omission of Muslims is open defecation on our secularism.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>When the Supreme Court intervenes only after more than 2,000 trees have been cut down in the Aarey forest, to make way for a metro shed that could have easily been built somewhere else, it is open defecation on our environment, our trees, our lungs and our health.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And, of course, when our shattered, limping economy is passed off as a tremendous success, and the current dark ages we are living in are described as acche din, that is open defecation on our credulity.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Any doctor will tell you that open defecation on a rampant scale poisons both the groundwater and the air and can make people terribly ill. And so, with the commendable zeal and evangelical fervor that is the best quality of the BJP/RSS worker, we, ordinary citizens, too, must set about boldly condemning and dedicatedly weeding out all such open defecators in our society. Only then will our nation truly be open-defecation free.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/10/12/look-who-openly-defecating.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/10/12/look-who-openly-defecating.html Sat Oct 12 11:15:14 IST 2019 mr-amit-shah-hit-tracks <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/09/20/mr-amit-shah-hit-tracks.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/9/20/118-Mr-Amit-Shah-hit-tracks-new.jpg" /> <p>Any executive producer worth his/her salt knows that on a daily prime-time soap there is no rest for the wicked. One has to run to stay in the same place, and continuously dream up new drama to keep the rankings amped. They also know that no matter how noble and high-minded the purported USP of the TV serial—it could be about a woman wanting to climb Mount Everest or becoming an IAF fighter pilot, or an open heart surgeon—what the audience really want to watch is: 1) Her romance with some alpha guy. 2) Her conflict with all these scheming chicks who are also lusting after said alpha guy.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>3) Her skirmishes with alpha guy’s mom—her mother-in-law. Everything else is sheer window dressing.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And this is why, by the 50th episode of every ‘woman-powering’ TV serial ever made in India, you will find the fighter pilot, the surgeon and the mountaineer in some ghastly over-decorated kitchen, sindoor in their hair-parting, chooda on their wrists, all professional ambition forgotten, alternately gazing deeply into the eyes of their alpha-men as their breasts heave decorously below their pallus.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I think our esteemed home minister would make an excellent executive producer on a daily soap. His ratings would be way off the charts. He stirs the pot with so much finesse—and knows that while the theme song and stated purpose of his government is development and economic growth, what really gets the people stoked is sensationalistic ‘maha-episodes’ appealing to the lowest common denominator, new ‘tracks’ as it were—and on this Hindi Divas he has come up with a real humdinger—the introduction of Hindi as the ‘bhasha number one’.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I predict that this particular track will do well for the Shah soap factory as well as his other hit tracks—black money, temples, love jihad, beef-eating, surgical strikes et al—have done.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In fact, this one is good enough to be a movie even—fittingly titled ‘Hindi Hai Hum’, and starring Akshay Kumar, who would play an earnest Hindi government school teacher from Benaras, with a name to warm the cockles of the high caste cow-belt heart—Dubeyji/Mishraji/Pandeyji/Sharmaji. He would be summoned to Vidya Bhavan to meet a kindly education minister, who would tell him that he has been chosen to be the first government school teacher to be posted deep into the heart of the exotic, barbarous buffalo-eating north-east/idli-eating south India to teach the noble language to the unschooled savages there.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Dubeyji/Mishraji/Pandeyji/Sharmaji would humbly seek the blessings of his local temple priest, and journey intrepidly to this dangerous territory, and then, armed with the dohas of Kabir and the poetry of Maithili Sharan Gupt, he would diss the local barbaric languages, dole out karate chops to the chinkie/darkie locals who speak it, indulge in low, supremacist humour and eventually tame the savages and get them all high-paying government jobs. Oh, and to show he was a progressive fellow, he would romance one of the local lasses.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Of course, there are those who say that a government ought not to model itself on an entertainment factory—a hollow thing of sensation and spectacle. But no canny politician listens to these fools anymore. The only rider, as anybody in the entertainment business will tell you, is that people get jaded really quick. The gag or track that created a sensation a few months ago, becomes passe very fast. There are decreasing returns to scale. And so, inevitably, every hit show becomes progressively ghastlier and ghastlier till it finally implodes in a hot, hysterical mess of plastic surgeries, memory-loss, suicides, murders, rape and miracles-from-God, and has to be cancelled.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Currently, that is the only hope we have got.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/09/20/mr-amit-shah-hit-tracks.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/09/20/mr-amit-shah-hit-tracks.html Fri Sep 20 11:37:53 IST 2019 leprosy-of-the-soul <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/09/06/leprosy-of-the-soul.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/9/6/71-Leprosy-of-the-soul-new.jpg" /> <p>I think it is pretty clear now that some fairly terrible things are happening in Kashmir. There has been a total lockdown for more than a month now, with seven million Kashmiris under virtual house arrest, their phones dead, their internet connections cut, and their democratic rights stripped away. It is the kind of high-handed, totalitarian situation that calls for outrage from the general citizenry, but the attitude that prevails in our big cities is one of quiet compliance and Government’s-Work-Is-God’s-Work. People who insist on “raking up” the issue at polite social gatherings are frowned upon as shrill, unmannered killjoys, totally lacking in etiquette, if not outright anti-nationals.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In fact “raking up” anything is considered impolite now. The broken economy, the resurgence of misogyny, the disappearance of buffalo meat from menus, the routine violence against minorities. These polarising topics interrupt the even flow of living room conversation and cast a dampener on social gatherings. Far better to avoid them altogether, and stick to the (increasingly shrinking!) list of safe topics we can all agree upon— like weight loss and fitness regimes, cricket, Bollywood and Hollywood gossip, and Brexit.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Apparently, the primary symptom of leprosy is desensitisation of the nerves. Basically, one loses the ability to feel pain, which in turn slowly and inexorably leads to the loss of extremities from repeated injuries or infection due to unnoticed wounds. Sufferers often notice nothing even as the disease inches inwards and upwards from the extremities to the vital organs.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Back in 2005, India claimed to have eradicated this dread disease through our public health programmes, but this was a false claim. Leprosy is still very much around, not just in its literal form, but also in a much more frightening avatar—a leprosy of the soul.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Desensitised, voluntarily lobotomised, dressed in our Navarata best, we chatter on brightly about nothing at all, even as around us, the powers that be declare that the gaps in Romila Thapar’s CV are bigger than the potholes on Bengaluru’s roads, or haul up journalists for recording a video of school children being fed roti and salt as nutritious midday meals. They are sinking their tentacles into over-the-top media platforms for airing “Hinduphobic” content like Prayaag Akbar’s Leila, and Hasan Minhaj’s Patriot Act, and are working to bring in a law that will be “aware and respectful of Indian cultural context when commissioning content”.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Meanwhile, in another country, a democracy much older than ours, a fading, ageing actor with his best movies behind him has had the guts to take on the prime minister no less, in language that is very far from parliamentary. Not that I am a fan of foul language for foul language’s sake, but surely is it not an indicator of the health of a democracy when citizens can speak up fearlessly?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“You will not f*** with my children’s future. You will not destroy the freedoms my grandfather fought two world wars to defend. F*** off you over-promoted rubber bath toy. Britain is revolted by you and you little gang of masturbatory prefects.”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Worse things than Brexit are happening in India today. But Bollywood’s favourite four letter F-word, “feel”, is totally missing from our reactions to them.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Clearly, hume feel nahi aa rahi.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And, so, inwards and upwards from the extremities of Kashmir to the heartlands of our living rooms the disease will spread, dancing merrily to the tune of mindless songs from “historically accurate” biopics starring muscly, righteous non-Khan heroes and scantily dressed but sanskari heroines. Maybe we will feel something when it finally hits our vitals.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/09/06/leprosy-of-the-soul.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/09/06/leprosy-of-the-soul.html Fri Sep 06 11:31:13 IST 2019 democracy-clipped <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/08/09/democracy-clipped.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/8/9/50-Democracy-clipped-new.jpg" /> <p>A small dot of black voting ink has been travelling slowly up the nail of my left index finger over the last two and a half months. This morning I find it has finally reached high enough to be snipped off. I am reluctant to do so. Recently, that black dot seems to be the only sign left to testify that we do, in fact, still live in a democracy. But I press down with the nail clippers nevertheless. And just like that, my nail is short and squeaky-swacch—all evidence that I had specially taken a Bengaluru-Delhi flight to cast my vote for an ailing, disunited, arrogant and corrupt party in a desperate, futile bid to ‘keep Modi out’ is gone. All that remains is the reality of Modi and Shah. Shah and Modi. What a jodi.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>If you go on the internet today, all is triumph and celebration. There is no talk of the fact that Indian stocks have just seen their worst July in 17 years, there is no talk of Kuldeep Singh Sengar, BJP MLA and rape and murder accused, even though he appeared before a Delhi Court, there is no talk of the suicide of V.G. Siddhartha Hegde and what this government’s policies are doing to entrepreneurs across the nation. All is chest-thumping and rah-rahing. Everybody is suddenly a Kashmir expert, they know articles 370, 367 and 35(A) inside out, they hail the strong decisive leaders who have made Kashmir’s special status as defunct as a thousand-rupee note, they applaud the preventive detention of elected leaders, the snapping of internet, broadband and landlines of ordinary citizens, they speak glibly of PoK and CoK and clearly I am the one who does not know CoK.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And so, I do not bother to even voice the obvious questions—why, if he had sworn to do tukde-tukde of Pakistan, is Amit Shah doing tukde-tukde of Kashmir instead? Also, what is to stop him doing this in your state tomorrow, huh? Or, make the obvious snide comments? Way to earn populist brownie points before the Delhi, Haryana and Maharashtra elections! Also, nice way to wriggle out of a state election you were 100 per cent going to lose—just dissolve the state itself.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And, as the feeble, headless mess that is the Congress makes spluttering, apoplectic noises and issues no consolidated reply even a day after the event, I just sit back and think about how insidiously clever the ‘Gujarat model’ is. How Modi and Shah go about regularly, scientifically feeding the goosebumps-seeking, reality show audience that India has become. The drama of demonetisation, the sexiness of surgical strikes, the zooming in on triple talaq, Modiji doing his very own ‘Discovery of India’ on Discovery Channel, Pragya Singh Thakur’s championing of Godse and subsequent maun vrat of repentance, there are cheap thrills on offer constantly.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Kashmir is just the latest. And, of course, this show of toxic masculinity, of stern correction, of thappar (slap) being an expression of pure, intense pyaar (love) is being lapped by a nation that has made Arjun Reddy a hit and Kabir Singh a super-hit.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Narendra Modi quoted from Star Wars during his much-touted New York visit, causing talk show host John Oliver to speculate (rather wittily) what he could have possibly meant by his random “May the force be with you” quote. Now that 28,000 extra troops have been rushed into Kashmir, Modi supporters on the internet are applauding the move and cackling gleefully, “See? He meant ‘may the Forces be with you!’”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The sickening eagerness and excitement with which we are willfully compromising our Constitution and surrendering our democratic rights makes me want to paraphrase a Star Wars quote, too.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“So this is how liberty dies. With thunderous applause.”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/08/09/democracy-clipped.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/08/09/democracy-clipped.html Fri Aug 09 11:26:15 IST 2019 delhi-sheila-sultana <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/07/26/delhi-sheila-sultana.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/7/26/56-Delhi-Sheila-Sultana-new.jpg" /> <p>My children grew up in Sheila Dikshit’s Delhi. Much before Narendra Modi’s Mann Ki Baat became a thing, it was her calm, grave voice they heard on the radio, every year during the exam season, exhorting them to stay calm and write their papers well. “Apne parche achhi tarah likhna, bina kisi tension ke likhna.” It was a small, but very fresh and thoughtful initiative for those times, and it made them fond of her.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>She is rightly credited for giving Delhi the only thing it can be proud of in recent times—the Delhi Metro. And, as Bombay and Bengaluru bumble about trying to get theirs up and running, an ungrateful populace realises what a mammoth task it actually was, and how deceptively easy she made it look. She also privatised the distribution of electricity, got buses and autos to use cleaner fuel, and fittingly, chose to be cremated at a CNG crematorium.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In the good old days, she could be spotted enjoying the city-state she ruled—at the movies, at the melas, always paying for whatever she bought, a small stately figure, hazel eyes shining in appreciation of all things tasteful and aesthetic. Once she zoomed in on a pair of bright red, three-inch-high wooden block heels I was wearing, exclaiming, “I used to have heels like that! Are they back in fashion?” When I told her they most certainly were, the slightly gap-toothed grin flashed. “Maybe I should dig out mine....”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The name plate outside her official residence had her name engraved in English, Hindi, Urdu and Gurmukhi and every time my ‘secular libtard’ children passed it, they would comment on how inclusive that was, and how cool she was.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>She was definitely ‘cool’. Her name cropped up repeatedly, (along with president A.P.J. Abdul Kalam’s, another ‘cool dude’) in surveys funded by Pepsi, a brand on which I worked on those days, in the category ‘Youth Icons of India’. They both proved that you did not have to be young in order to appeal to the young, that what we call a Perennial today can have vastly more youth connect than many Millennials.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Another urban legend about her was that as a young mother she was absolutely ruthless about keeping a spick-and-span home. If her kids did not pick up their stuff and put it away by the end of the day, she would apparently just throw it out, donating it as she saw fit. This quickly taught them to be neat. I was much inspired by this parenting technique and decided to employ it. “She’s doing a Sheila!” the kids would scream as I swept ruthlessly through the house, picking up their favorite toys and clothes and tossing them remorselessly into a church box. “Stop her! Stop her!”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Maybe I am being appallingly sexist here, but I do feel really safe when there is a lady leader in charge. The older, the better. If I board a flight and hear a woman’s voice go, “Good morning, this is your captain speaking,” I slide back into my seat, all my tension eased away, and eat the most fattening thing on the menu. As CEOs, presidents, prime ministers and chief ministers, the best of women bring so much competence and calm to the workplace. But even among this small elite brigade, Mrs Dikshit’s name stands out.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>After 15 rock-steady years in power, she was finally undone by public anger at the unbridled corruption of the UPA in general and the Commonwealth Games committees in particular, as well as people’s anger over the Nirbhaya rape case (even though the Delhi Police did not report to her, something Arvind Kejriwal has used in his defence so many times since then.) But she was as much an Empress of Delhi as Sultana Razia.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It goes without saying that she will live on in her city-state’s heart. But, Delhi, you need to name a road after her ASAP. A good one. A long one. With lots of trees and flowers lining it. And a big fat Metro station.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/07/26/delhi-sheila-sultana.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/07/26/delhi-sheila-sultana.html Fri Jul 26 11:35:35 IST 2019 akbarnama-for-abdication-drama <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/07/12/akbarnama-for-abdication-drama.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/7/12/42-Akbarnama-for-abdication-drama-new.jpg" /> <p>David Ogilvy, arguably the “father of advertising”, used to send all new office heads a Matryoshka doll from Gorky on their first day on the job. If the new appointee had the curiosity to open the doll, and keep opening till he came to the inside of the smallest doll, he would find this message:“If each of us hires people who are smaller than we are, we shall become a company of dwarfs. But if each of us hires people who are bigger than we are, we shall become a company of giants.”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It is easier said than done, of course. Only people with genuine smarts, high self-esteem, an appetite for healthy competition and a hunger for achievement can follow this policy. The Mughal emperor Akbar did it. He was an unlettered, unschooled man, but he surrounded himself with brilliant men. His nine jewels included an economist, a general, an administrator, wits, poets and philosophers. They spoke truth to power without fear or intimidation, and the general public profited from their combined wisdom.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But lazy, mediocre, entitled people are always too insecure to empower anybody who can become a “threat” to them. They tend to systematically weed out high-profile performers, and favour people with talents and passion inferior to their own. It is a policy that hollows out the organisation and inevitably ends with dumb, dumber and dumbest monkeys dangling at the bottom of the food chain, a phenomena economists describe rather piquantly as a bozo explosion, the kind that is currently plaguing the Congress party.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Does Rahul Gandhi have the appetite to be an Akbar or an Ogilvy? Will he be able to look past the bozos and genuinely empower a Sachin Pilot, a Jyotiraditya Scindia, or a Shashi Tharoor—a youngish, dynamic, well spoken, popular leader? Sometimes I think he actually will. And if he does, it will be an amazingly courageous, unselfish and patriotic act on his part, one that will pay rich dividends to the party, and in the long term, even to him.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Or, will he do what everybody is pretty much expecting him to do, and place some nameless, faceless, no-threat cipher in the top job? It is ironic that while Ayodhya is a Camelot of the BJP, it is the Congress which has been playing out so many scenes from the Ramleela lately. We have got righteous Prince Rama swearing he will go into exile, we have got everybody moaning and breast-beating trying to get him to stop.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Just like loyal brother Bharat, we have got any number of loyal lieutenants vowing that they are unworthy to rule, and will do so only in big brother’s name, with his sandals on the singhasan, and devout obedience in their hearts. We have even got a swelling band of loyal Laxman/Sita types who have resigned in solidarity with big brother and are all set to ‘go into exile’ themselves! The whole thing stinks of sycophancy and it is pathetic.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Let us hope Rahul is zen enough to be the smallest Matryoshka doll—the one that goes on to father giants. He certainly seems to be talking the talk; it is time to see if he will walk the walk.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And to the ‘faithful’ within the party, I would advice a little less Ramayana-style toadying, and a little more Mughal swag, please. An old-fashioned, bloody war of succession where little brothers take on big brothers for the throne is the need of the hour. The time for timidity, modesty and pehle aap is past. Please step up and stake your claim strongly. Because we, the people of India, are holding auditions for future leaders, too. And our eyes are on you.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/07/12/akbarnama-for-abdication-drama.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/07/12/akbarnama-for-abdication-drama.html Fri Jul 12 11:34:48 IST 2019 kabir-singh-is-toxic-masculinity-at-its-worst <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/06/28/kabir-singh-is-toxic-masculinity-at-its-worst.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/6/28/22-Toxic-masculinity-feature-length-new.jpg" /> <p>So Arjun Reddy has been remade in Hindi, with minimal changes, as Kabir Singh, and is on its way to becoming a super-duper hit. There is a whole lot of people wah-wahing the “intense” love story, even as rational people and feminists everywhere trash it for romanticising both toxic masculinity and timid, doe-eyed female passiveness—the kind made famous in sicko international films and books like Fifty Shades of Grey, Twilight and Beautiful Disaster.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>These kind of stories usually follow the same doomed Beauty and the Beast tropes, you know the one that says that every f#$ked-up guy can be “fixed” by marriage to the right girl. There is a handsome, successful, hyper-sexualised alpha male, who becomes obsessed with a quiet, submissive girl who attracts his attention by (as Kabir puts it) simply breathing. He “falls in love” with her in a single sighting; conversation, interchange of thoughts, opinions, hopes and dreams are not at all necessary. She then becomes the only beauty who can “calm” this crazy, raging beast.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The “intensity” of their love is depicted through scenes in which he seeks her out to collapse in her lap (without asking her for permission) after devouring mountain lions (that is Twilight), pulverising opponents in a boxing ring (that is Beautiful Disaster) or working all night on his thesis (that is Kabir Singh.) He then wakes up the next day to obsess about her diet, her sleep, the drape of her chunni, the boys who may be looking at her and her menstrual cycle. This constant surveillance, again, is supposed to show his “intense” love for her.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The fact that he literally calls dibs on her—by issuing a firman to the entire student body that nobody should talk to “the new girl in the white salwar kameez” or rag her or flirt with her because she is “Kabir Sir’s interest”? Not an issue. Madly arousing? Not an issue.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The fact that he kisses her on the cheek on the very day they meet, again without permission, and after exchanging only three cursory sentences with her, which definitely does not include the question ‘would you like to date me?’ Oh, and did I mention that a groaning alaap kicks in as his smacking lips make contact with her shrinking flesh? Yeah, it is that kind of movie.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>There is worse. He does not even let her choose her own friends, shooing away the girls she has chosen to sit with, and haughtily beckoning what he repeatedly calls a “fat chick” to sit next to her, instead. Be friends with her, he tells the impassive Preethi. Fat chicks and beautiful girls should hang out together. Those other chicks will not stay your friend, but the fat chick will. Trust me.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Preethi clearly digs this kind of abusive behavior. Because, after a few interactions she is shown to start smiling secretively to herself every time Kabir shows up, and very very soon, she puts out her hand to interlace her fingers with his. And then, reeling with lust and gratitude at being the alpha’s chosen one, she sleeps with him.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>They still have not had a single conversation at this point.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The defenders of Kabir Singh are saying, “Oh! It is just a movie, do not over-intellectualise it.” But the fact of the matter is that filmmaking is a very precise, expensive science, and all these depictions and dialogues have been carefully vetted and deliberately, cynically selected. Shahid Kapoor has seen the Telugu version, and then knowing full well what he is getting into, given it the thumbs up.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Make no mistake, hooliganism, bouts of rage, drunkenness, drug abuse, lack of consent and violence-as-love are being both normalised and glamourised in a theatre near you.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Pass the popcorn.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/06/28/kabir-singh-is-toxic-masculinity-at-its-worst.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/06/28/kabir-singh-is-toxic-masculinity-at-its-worst.html Fri Jun 28 14:26:43 IST 2019 we-need-more-of-virat-kohli-sportsmanlike-logic-of-empathy <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/06/15/we-need-more-of-virat-kohli-sportsmanlike-logic-of-empathy.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/6/15/67-Strokeplay-in-solidarity-new.jpg" /> <p>Nice of Virat Kohli to reprimand the boorish desis in the crowd for booing Steve Smith, who has started playing again after the one-year ban. They were chanting “cheater, cheater” at him so loudly that Virat could hear it; he came over to scowl and gesture at them to quit the booing and get clapping instead. The crowd piped down, Steve grinned gratefully at Virat, and the nation at large went gaga over this show of gentlemanliness by our skipper. “Aggressive player, benevolent man—so easy to love!” tweeted his wife, and a smitten nation agreed.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In the press conference that followed, Virat seemed rather startled at all the attention his gesture got, and stated that it was all quite simple, really. If he had done something wrong, taken his punishment, and come back to play after a ban, he would have felt really upset if the spectators had taunted him. That is why he had urged them to stop. A use of basic empathy and ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you’ which we should see often in public (and private) life, but which is becoming increasingly scarce on the ground.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I found this gesture of Virat’s so much cleaner, and so much easier an example to hold up to small children, than all that brouhaha about M.S. Dhoni’s balidan badge. How to explain that to children now? Look, children, Dhoni is trying to show respect and gratitude to the Indian Army by wearing this badge, but the ICC will not let him, because their rules say that the logos on players uniforms must carry no political, religious or racial connotations.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Why does the ICC say this? The children may ask. Because politics, religion and race have no place on the sports field, where all players are equal, and the only ranking used to differentiate between them is their playing ability.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Children might even innocently ask that if Dhoni cares for the Army so much, why can he not just donate his match fee to them, or get a balidan tattoo, or (best option of all) play brilliantly, win the match and dedicate the victory to our Army instead? And, then, what would we tell them?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The whole thing smells of a needlessly ‘created’ controversy, the type that excites Twitter and gives our vacuous news channels an excuse to bang on bombastically about freedom of speech, while under-reporting genuine freedom of speech issues like the absolutely random detention of journalist Prashant Kanojia which happened pretty much at the same time. In fact I could not help noticing that some of them are not even calling him a journalist, but a “man” who “claims” to be a “freelance journalist”, in a tone that is clearly sceptical. This, when Prashant is an alumnus of the Indian Institute of Mass Communications, Delhi, with work experience in The Indian Express and The Wire Hindi.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Prashant’s tweet was actually mildly funny—it shared a video of a lady who was eager to marry Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, along with a message urging him to run away with her, adding that the nation would support him if he did so. Anybody less paranoid would have ignored it, but clearly the chief minister of UP is not that man. He has decided to use Prashant Kanojia to send out the chilling message that he is above the law, and not to be joked about.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It is really high time we all applied Virat’s simple, sportsmanlike logic of empathy and ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you’ to our national situation. Come out in support of Prashant, because tomorrow, if (or rather when) we are not Hindu enough, not vegetarian enough, not respectful enough, not north Indian enough, not patriotic enough, we will need people to speak up for us, too.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/06/15/we-need-more-of-virat-kohli-sportsmanlike-logic-of-empathy.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/06/15/we-need-more-of-virat-kohli-sportsmanlike-logic-of-empathy.html Sat Jun 15 20:13:33 IST 2019 get-up-dust-your-knees-off-and-learn <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/05/31/get-up-dust-your-knees-off-and-learn.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/5/31/23-Get-up-dust-your-knees-off-and-learn-new.jpg" /> <p>Ugh. The last time I was so pumped up, and proved so disastrously wrong, was back in 2007, when the Indian cricket team crawled back home from the West Indies after failing to make it to even the super-eights round of the ICC World Cup. It totally broke my heart.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>There I was in my blue billion T-shirt, both cheeks painted bright blue, tirangas clutched in both my hands, a ticket to Jamaica all booked and confirmed, and there were my dreams, dashed to smithereens on the ground.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>That team was led by a Rahul, too. It was the ‘strongest team in the world on paper,’ comprising the golden trinity of Rahul-Sachin-Sourav, not to mention young talents like Virender Sehwag, Yuvraj Singh and Mahendra Singh Dhoni. They lost to Bangladesh, barely beat Bermuda, then collapsed utterly in a must-win match to Sri Lanka and had to bow ignominiously out of the tournament in the preliminary round itself.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Young fans looking forward to the 2019 World Cup may not recollect this story, but the cowering, chastened team was actually herded into a police van when they reached the airport under the cover of darkness, even as fans bayed for their blood outside.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Of course, that particular story has a fairytale ending. There was introspection, overhauling, and brutal, large scale culling. Heads rolled, new blood gushed in, a talented, earthy new captain was appointed and empowered, and four years later, India finally had its fairytale ending, when our team held the glittering ICC World Cup trophy in their sweaty, triumphant hands.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Of course, I am guilty of gross over-simplification, but what I am trying to say is there is a lot to be learned from failure if one is grounded enough, hungry enough, and courageous enough to get up, dust one’s knees off, and learn from it. (Ask Smriti Irani!)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>That is my fervent message to the Congress. For heaven’s sake, pull together and work bloody hard for a change. Introspect, overhaul, resign, recruit, reinvent, be brutally honest and dig deep to re-find the essence that makes you you.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Also, if Rahul wants to quit, then take the man at his word and let him quit. Find out what you are, when there’s no Nehru-Gandhi around to front you. And when you find out, tell us—loudly and clearly and unequivocally, without any me-tooing, and panicking and hesitation. Learn a lesson from the BJP—they have made it categorically clear that their dream is a Hindu Rashtra, and everybody who does not like the idea of that can just shut the f@#k up, roll up their Janamaz rugs and go live in Pakistan. Sure, Modi and Shah have to throw a bone to the minorities and mouth platitudes now and then, but this never confuses their workers or their supporters. They all remain quite serene and understand ki yeh sab toh kehna padta hai (it’s all lip-service); the real agenda remains Hindi, Hindu, Hindustan.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So, where is your inversely corresponding, uncompromising vision for India? Where is your clearly stated stand that people who oppose the Constitution of the Republic of India can just board their Pushpak Vimaans and go live in freaking Mahishmati? Where is your spine, your unequivocal stand on non-appeasement, and your zero-tolerance to intolerance?</p> <p>Also, this time, do not take another three-and-a-half years to choose your next president. Pick one now. Or stick with the one you have got. Whatever. We do not really care. Just tell us what you stand for please (hopefully democracy, institutions, secularism, honesty) and you may yet become relevant once again. As a third Rahul once said, ‘Picture abhi baki hai’.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/05/31/get-up-dust-your-knees-off-and-learn.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/05/31/get-up-dust-your-knees-off-and-learn.html Fri May 31 11:49:50 IST 2019 anuja-chauhans-prediction-a-new-PM-with-a-lagaan-type-crew-in-tow <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/05/17/anuja-chauhans-prediction-a-new-PM-with-a-lagaan-type-crew-in-tow.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/5/17/118-A-hero-will-rise-new.jpg" /> <p>It is prediction time. Everybody and their parrot, their god-man and their Nandi bull are prophesying who will score big on May 23. Will an ensemble cast film—a sort of Ocean’s Eleven or Lagaan—win the big day, or will the victor be a single hero movie —starring a white-bearded Munna Bhai and a bald, chubby Circuit?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The predictions vary wildly. Anywhere you turn, somebody or the other is animatedly making their own bhavishyavani based on a mixture of wild hunch, ear-to-the-ground info (chats with Uber drivers are very popular), pseudo-mathematical calculations about the way the numbers add up, travels into the heart of Uttar Pradesh (which generally means one conference in Noida) and plain, old-fashioned wishful thinking.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>There is a lot of ‘remember, you heard it here first’ going on on the TV channels. And at social gatherings, people are placing bets left, right and centre. I keep hearing that ‘the soul of the nation is at stake in this election’. But from what I am seeing all around me, there is a whole lot of single malt at stake, too.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Naturally, I, too, have a prediction.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>As I hardly ever take Ubers, and never have conferences in Noida, mine is based purely on the body language of our key players in their public interviews and interactions. And my reading tells me that Narendra Modi has lost his mojo, while Rahul Gandhi has finally found his.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>After years of public ridicule, and more ignominious flat-on-your-back landings than the first half of a Rambo movie, Rahul appears serenely confident. He has all his policy answers in place, his manifesto on his fingertips, he is disarmingly frank in his answers on the coalition question, and the binary he has been seeking to create, between hate, as characterised by Modi, and love, as characterised by himself, is finally sticking. He smiles, holds eye-contact, interrupts politely yet confidently, makes his point coherently, and uses the name of his interviewer with an insouciance that would warm the cockles of Dale Carnegie’s heart.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>His long-suffering cheerleaders, thrilled and grateful that their chosen one is finally leading ably and coherently, are providing support fire with gusto. Of course, they should have gotten their act together six months ago, and they may have to pay a heavy price for that, but at least their act is finally together.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Modi’s graph seems to be moving in the other direction. I first detected a certain wistfulness in his eyes at the end of the January 26 parade this year, when he walked down Rajpath after the president had left, waving to the crowds. It was the look Farooq Sheikh had in his eyes in the ‘dekh lo aaj humko ji bhar ke’ song from Bazaar, when he looks at Supriya Pathak in her wedding finery, knowing he may never see her again.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And it has been downhill all the way since then. We have seen maha-bluster and chest-thumping through Pulwama and Balakot, a gratuitous national broadcast to announce the successful ASAT testing by DRDO, the peculiar Main Bhi Chowkidar campaign, the desperately crowd-appeasing Akshay Kumar interaction, and most recently, the ‘cloudy’ interview, where our prime minister gave off the vibes of a child who has not done his homework trying to bluff his way through an interaction with the strict teacher ma’am. There are hesitations, lip-licks and more dropped eyelashes than in a hero-heroine interaction on a StarPlus daily.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And so, here is my prediction: A new prime minister (may he/she reign for five full years!) with a ragtag Lagaan-like crew in tow. Tumultuous times ahead, basically. Good thing I will have all that single malt to fortify me.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/05/17/anuja-chauhans-prediction-a-new-PM-with-a-lagaan-type-crew-in-tow.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/05/17/anuja-chauhans-prediction-a-new-PM-with-a-lagaan-type-crew-in-tow.html Fri May 17 20:55:05 IST 2019 why-dont-women-host-bollywood-film-award-shows <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/05/03/why-dont-women-host-bollywood-film-award-shows.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/5/3/67-Let-the-men-dance-new.jpg" /> <p>Can you guys keep track of the number of awards Bollywood hands out? There’s IIFA and Filmfare and Star Screen and Cine-something and almost a dozen others…. I happened to watch one (or some?) of them lately—I’m really not sure which, but it had Ayushmann Khurrana and Vicky Kaushal and Rajkummar Rao and Salman Khan and Shah Rukh Khan all ‘anchoring’ on stage. They made all these self-deprecating jokes and took potshots at each other and moaned about how new heroes are spawning like frogs in the Mumbai rain, while an adoring audience chuckled and applauded at what good sports they all were. (Of course one never knows if the adoring audience was actually there while the show unfolded; very often VIPs come, give reaction shots of themselves smiling and applauding and go home—and the channel then edits the footage to make it look like they were there all along.)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In between the jolly, witty anchoring that was being done on stage by the leading men, the so-called ‘leading’ women appeared to do dance performances and be at the receiving end of various ‘jokes’ and wisecracks.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It is the same, depressing format every single time.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>One that sends out the clear, unmistakable message that the heroes are the alphas of Bollywood—they stride the stage like colossuses, in command of the entire performance—while the women are just shiny decorative little item numbers, with no agency and no speaking time, shoved in hurriedly between the heroes’ self-centred monologues.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Why haven’t Priyanka Chopra and Katrina Kaif hosted a Filmfare awards night yet? I’m sure they’d do a brilliant job of it! Why didn’t Sridevi and Madhuri ever do one? I can’t believe me missed on a performance like that! Why hasn’t Alia Bhatt hosted one yet? Or Taapsee Pannu? Or Parineeti Chopra? Is Alia in any way a less brilliant newcomer than, say, a Vicky Kaushal? Is Taapsee not as talented as Kartik Aaryan? How come nobody in marketing or event management or production has had the bright idea to entrust that all-empowering mic into a woman’s hands? How come none of our gutsy new girls are striding up and down those glittering stages, taking potshots at the industry and at the older guard and how the beauty pageants are spawning new girls every year ha-ha-ha and making some sharp mentions of me-too and the inequality of the pay-grade? And stepping aside now and then for Aaryan and Varun Dhawan to come put on an item number?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The Oscars are hosted by both men and women. Whoopi Goldberg’s done it. Ellen De Generes’s done it. Liza Minnelli, Goldie Hawn. It’s a long list of witty, confident women, who cracked up the audience and sent out the strong, unequivocal message that anchoring such a big night can be a woman-sized job.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>We have equally witty, confident women in Bollywood—how come nobody thought of giving the job to say, the cast of Veere-Di-Wedding last year? Kareena, Sonam, Swara and Shikha? How come nobody even though of giving them a section to host?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Bollywood seems to believe that on awards night, the woman’s role is either to dance, or hand out an award, while wearing high heels and some dumb-ass, tent-sized gown. The only conversation she is allowed, is a little prepared speech on the red carpet about the designer she bought her gown from. She cannot wear something sensible (yet flattering) with flat shoes and neat hair, and talk about anything remotely intelligent. No matter how big a hit her movie has turned out to be, she cannot make politically incorrect jokes or take pot-shots at Shah Rukh or Salman.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It is like we are living in some macho, jungle raj. Where Sarabi and Nala can never hope to be Mufasa or Simba.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/05/03/why-dont-women-host-bollywood-film-award-shows.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/05/03/why-dont-women-host-bollywood-film-award-shows.html Sat May 04 12:20:24 IST 2019 my-struggles-with-religion <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/04/18/my-struggles-with-religion.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/4/18/81-My-struggles-with-religion-new.jpg" /> <p>Exciting times! I’m being trolled on Twitter for pointing out, on an NDTV debate, that #MainBhiChowkidaar is essentially a reaction to #ChowkidaarChorHai, and therefore a defensive position and an acknowledgement that the ‘chor’ barb hurt, and hurt hard. Now this is my personal opinion as an advertising professional. Anybody is free to agree or disagree with it.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I had hoped for intelligent debate on the issue, but all I got was a herd of pseudo-chowkidaars stampeding all over my Twitter feed, eagerly informing the world that I am Congress politician Margaret Alva’s daughter-in-law (so what?) and that I have absolutely no legit status as an advertising professional (not true, I have worked in the field for 17 years and my work in PepsiCo is very well known). They also accuse me of ‘hiding my real name’ (again, not true—my given name is Anuja Chauhan, and I am feminist enough to keep it that way.) They call me all kinds of exotic names like ‘rice-bag convert’ and ‘crypto-evangelist’ and ‘chudail’ and triumphantly dredge up an ancient tweet I had posted in the early, heady days of Twitter, about converting to Christianity ten years after my marriage, and stating that it is a free country and if anybody wants to change their religion, they should be allowed to do so.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>They keep trotting this tweet out periodically as proof that I am ‘hiding’ my identity. I fail to see how I am ‘hiding’ it, if it is out there on a public Twitter post for heaven’s sake, not to mention in the acknowledgements pages of every book I have written—and I have written five.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But I digress. I do not want to talk about trolls today, or about pseudo-chowkidaars, I want to talk about something much more important (to me anyway)—my struggles with religion.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I have become, to mangle Pink Floyd, ‘Spiritually Numb’. Or post-religious, if there is such a term.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>When I was a child, I had intense, unquestioning faith in ‘Bhagwaanji’, whatever that childish term meant. As I grew older, I got disenchanted with organised religion. Christianity appealed to me as a simple, clean faith; I was much struck by the idea of a man sacrificing himself to save the world, and also, I had a list of selfish boons I was hoping Jesus would grant. So I converted.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>A good many years later, I realised that Christianity was as good or as bad as any other organised religion—the same claiming of a higher moral ground, the same insistence that it was the only true way and that all other ways were false, the same harping on the fact that no miracles were happening for me because my faith was not strong enough. Very traumatised and heartbroken, I realised that I was back to square one.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>This time around, I did not bother to tweet my position to the world. I knew the world had enough drama going on already, thank you very much, and it did not really give two hoots about my private epiphany, which was this: I do not think anybody alive has the answer to the God question. We are all just stumbling around, making wild guesses, and extrapolating and hoping hard, really.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I have not lost all hope in a Maker, but I know that nobody has a patent on him. And that he does not dwell in brick or mortar or in purported birthplaces.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The larger point I am trying to make, I guess, is that everybody’s religion is their own personal business and nobody else’s. And that more evil has been done in the name of religion than in the name of anything else in world history. At the moment, an entire election seems to be centering, willy-nilly, upon it, and upon its ghoulish twin sibling—muscular patriotism. Please let us not let it become the reason why we pick a particular party.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/04/18/my-struggles-with-religion.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/04/18/my-struggles-with-religion.html Thu Apr 18 12:22:00 IST 2019 chowkidars-we-are-not-stupid <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/03/21/chowkidars-we-are-not-stupid.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/3/21/62-Chowkidars-new.jpg" /> <p>This has got to be the most dumbed-down election ever. The other day, Twitter was awash with major political leaders all thumping their chests and insisting they were chowkidars. Chowkidars themselves are puzzled by how their profession has become so high-class and sought-after suddenly. They have been gathering at the bottom of the buildings in my colony, leaning on their lathis, and discussing if there is a pay rise in there for them, somewhere.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But of course there is not.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It is like last fortnight everybody was walking around in camouflage fatigues (including Virat Kohli and his merry crew) insisting they were faujis, but the faujis got nothing out of it. Nor did the chai-wallahs, a little while ago, when our PM was thumping his chest and proudly saying ki haan, main chaiwalla hoon.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Anyway, I suspect #MainBhiChowkidar has been churned out in a hurry, in a blind panic actually, because the Congress’s chowkidar chor hai slogan has been gathering momentum. And also because the Modi hai toh mumkin hai (which is a shameless lift of the old Airtel Magic hai toh mumkin hai line, I wonder if they are considering suing) has created as much as a ripple as the new Pepsi commercial (none). The fast-talking marketing team has sold the panicked party some glib, twisted logic of ‘embracing a negative and turning it into a positive’ with the result that now Modi is now lumped with calling himself Chowkidar Narendra Modi, surely a sad comedown from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and horribly reminiscent of the Insaan suffix that follows the names of all members of the Dera Sacha Sauda cult.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It is actually pretty funny, but also rather scary—as it begs the question that if everybody is standing outside, holding a lathi, smoking a beedi and guarding the building, then who the hell is inside the building doing the vital work of governance? There is contempt for education, skills and white-collar workers in the line. There is watchdog-ism in the line. There is khap-ism in the line. You get the sense that the country has tuned into a Big Boss set, and there are surveillance cameras everywhere—watching you narrowly.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And of course, there is the point that if indeed Modi is a chowkidar, then he is a pretty lousy one. Vijay Mallya, Nirav Modi, Mehul Choksi have all happily run out of the country on his watch, and he has done absolutely zip about getting them back. He has not been very good at guarding the institutions of democracy either—the Supreme Court, the CBI, the RBI, and the Constitution of India itself, have all been messed with and compromised in various ways on his watch. Crimes against women have been on a rampant rise as well—so no kudos for his chowkidari in that department either. The only thing he has been successful at, is a certain regressive, sternly paternalistic sort of moral policing.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So the BJP’s usage of this particular line strays beyond irony into absolute dishonesty.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Supporters of the BJP may say in his defence that at least he has a campaign in place. There is a film and a line and it is all rolling out on time. The Congress, on the other hand, still remains absolutely mum about their slogan, campaign and manifesto for elections 2019. Which, of course, is really quite unforgivable. They should have been out there, united, alliances in place, firing from all cylinders by now. I mean, do they want to win or not? Seriously, what gives?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But I would say the BJP is worse.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Because while the Congress’s lethargy and silence can (and should) be considered stupid, the BJP’s campaign reveals something much much worse. It reveals that the self-styled pseudo-chowkidars in the BJP think that we, the voters, are stupid.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/03/21/chowkidars-we-are-not-stupid.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/03/21/chowkidars-we-are-not-stupid.html Thu Mar 21 11:01:29 IST 2019 lets-send-a-majboot-message <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/03/08/lets-send-a-majboot-message.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/3/8/55-Lets-send-a-majboot-message-new.jpg" /> <p><i>Yeh hamara siddhant hai….</i></p> <p><i>Hum ghar mein ghus kar marangey!</i></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Said our prime minister in a rally, to a thin crowd of lustily baying supporters. (It loosely translates to ‘These are our principles.... We will enter your home, and kill you.’)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Of course, his fans—he still has many, though fewer than he used to—will rush to assure me that he was talking to Pakistanis/terrorists/enemies of Bharat Mata. It is their homes that he will enter, and because he is a man of principles, it is them that he will kill.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Trouble is, the definition of enemy of Bharat Mata is growing vaguer by the day. In our increasingly insular country, it is fast becoming the most inclusive club of all. Pretty much anybody can gain entry. Hindu, but don’t believe in idol worship? Congratulations, you are in! Hindu, but married a descendent of a ‘raped-by-the-armies-of-Muhammad Ghori’ Muslim or ‘converted-for-a-bag-of-rice’ Christian? In! Any sort of religious minority? In! Did not stand up for the national anthem because you are a decorated soldier who lost both legs in war? You are in, too! Dared to ask for proof of the death of 300+ Jaish terrorists in Balakot? In you go. Wondered why our intelligence agencies did not know that 350kg of RDX had entered Kashmir? In! Demanded why our fighter pilots—the cream of the cream of our armed forces—are defending our nation in rickety old MiG-21s, while the Tejas remains unready, HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited) languishes, and our order of 126 Rafale jets gets whittled down to 36? In! In! In! Sniggered when the Vande Bharat Express broke down on its maiden run from Varanasi to Delhi? In! Reposted a Humans of Hindutva post saying that Hindu and Islamic fundamentalists both have loads in common? In! Asked why our prime minister was at his party’s rally, pushing his party’s agenda, and rabbiting on about his booths being sabse majboot (strongest), when the nation was at the brink of war? In! Raised an eyebrow when the PM publicly poked fun at the problems of dyslexic children and their anxious mothers? In! Drank a shot of Beefeater gin? Yup, you are in for sure.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And so, when my prime minister says that he will ghuso (enter) the homes of the enemies of Bharat Mata and kill them, I feel he is basically saying that he will enter my home and kill me. That is the definite feeling I get. This man is out to get me—a moderate, law-abiding, tax-paying Indian citizen, with a fondness for meat, and for hearing meaty answers to pertinent, reasonable questions, and a complete contempt for the fawning, snarling lapdog that is the Indian media today. I am sure I am not the only person who feels this way. Crores of others do, too.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I have stopped watching Indian news channels entirely, and I usually avoid Twitter because it is so damn toxic, but I did go there this week and was amused to see a lot of people proposing a very desirable switcheroo to Pakistan. “Take Arnab!” they suggested. “Take Arnab and give us back Abhinandan! Please!” To which clever, clever Imran Khan swiftly and politely responded—err, no thanks, here is Abhinandan back already, and you can keep Arnab, too.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>A nation gets the media and the prime minister it deserves. Looking at the people we have got in the posts today, I have to say that we are a weak, vain, greedy and foolish nation and it is high time we mended our ways. Let us ghuso into those polling booths and vote in somebody genuinely majboot.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/03/08/lets-send-a-majboot-message.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/03/08/lets-send-a-majboot-message.html Fri Mar 08 12:09:19 IST 2019 our-time-will-come <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/02/23/our-time-will-come.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/2/23/56-Our-time-will-come-new.jpg" /> <p>Overheard a child in an airport bus asking his mother if we were now at war with Pakistan. Before she could even reply, pat came his next question, “Will my exams be postponed?”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>From the nervous giggle he gave as he asked this question, it was pretty evident that he wouldn’t mind that happening at all.</p> <p>Yes, the suspension of all routine activities during war can be called ‘exciting’—there is drama everywhere, every emotion is heightened, there are insane goose-bumpy highs and gut-wrenching lows. That is why there are so many books and movies about war—it makes for great, soul-stirring cinema.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>What it doesn’t make for, however, is for great reality.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Real war is painful, cold, smelly, gruelling, messy, nerve-wracking, a drudgery. It is tragic, wasteful, sordid and grotesque. Limping back to normalcy afterwards can take decades. It is, above all, highly avoidable. As far as I know, the only people baying for the cheap thrills of war are those who have never been in one.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>A mature reaction from both the government and the populace is the need of the hour, and thankfully, that seems to be what is happening. People are offering up their homes and their good offices to Kashmiri students who are facing threats of violence from jingoistic groups. Political parties are stating that they will stand united through this hour of crisis, and already, two leading Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorists have been killed in a controlled, carefully targeted encounter. Of course, obnoxious elements like the Bajrang Dal have been ordering Kashmiri students in Uttarakhand to ‘go home and not return till there is an Indian flag waving from every Kashmiri home’, and Amit Shah couldn’t resist a few cheap opportunistic cracks at the Congress. But overall, the trend seems to be more introspective and anti-war.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>February-March is the season for board exams, and I can’t help thinking that this was probably the time when the young Adil Ahmad Dar decided to drop out of school. Becoming a glamorous fidayeen, claiming the moral high ground over all his tamely studious schoolmates, training with ‘macho’ weapons and plotting his revenge on the soldiers who allegedly made him rub his nose in the mud in a circle around their jeep must have seemed far more exciting than mundanely studying for his approaching class twelve board exams. But a better revenge would have been to stay in school, crib his books, clear his exams and somehow make a success of his life instead of dying in this ghastly fashion, thus becoming what the soldiers suspected him of being all along.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Sure, given the ground realities, Adil’s classmates may complete their class twelve and their graduation and still have no jobs to show for it in a few years time. But hey, at least they will still be in the running. Suicide, even a ‘spectacular’ suicide like this one, is eventually an act of terrible cowardice. Far better is to sit the papers and try and make a good life for yourself, your homeland and your neighbours.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Two popular commercial movies have been rocking in our cinemas lately. One offers a wham-bam solution to the problems the world throws at us and offers us the high-energy slogan, “How’s the josh?”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The second, whose main character just happens to be a Muslim college boy who lives in grinding poverty in a squalid slum, recommends a more measured, constructive path. Its message is about hard work, hanging in there, eschewing cheap thrills, keeping your cool and eventually finding your place under the sun. That is the slogan we must adopt. Apna time ayega.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/02/23/our-time-will-come.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/02/23/our-time-will-come.html Sat Feb 23 12:17:17 IST 2019 force-of-the-forties <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/02/08/force-of-the-forties.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/2/8/69-Force-of-the-forties-new.jpg" /> <p>So I am to be an empty nester. My youngest—now in class 12—starts his board exams next week. And, by August, the house will be empty, and my husband and I will be staring at each other’s faces with nothing to look forward to except menopause. But, I am no longer depressed about this stage of my life, or the dimming of my youth, or the three empty bedrooms on the first floor, because of Priyanka Gandhi.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Dressed in broad bordered cotton saris and bright blouses, and wearing an even brighter smile, she is embarking on a brand new career in her late 40s. Her kids are all grown up, her style quotient all figured out, she has lost that diffident quality she had in her 20s and gained the calm self-assurance of a woman who has lived and learned a fair bit, and is going to be taking no crap from anybody. I am sure she is going to be a force to be reckoned with, politically speaking.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>My earlier such poster woman (not girl, please note!) used to be Shobha Kapoor, who lived out her 20s and 30s merely as Mrs Jeetendra, the wife of a megastar, with no major achievements of her own. And then in her 40s, she had this total reinvention, got together with her young daughter, started Balaji Telefilms Limited and gave the world Great Grand Masti, The Dirty Picture and Smriti Irani.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Internationally, the list of such women is even longer and includes people like Toni Morrison, Julia Child, Vera Wang—all women who started working in their 40s and made a brilliant job of it.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Do women get more cooler as they age? I firmly believe they do. Compare the very beautiful, but very silent Young Indira Nehru, the goongi gudiya or silent doll as she was sneeringly dubbed, to the Iron Lady who dominated our politics in the 1970s and 1980s. Look at the younger, defensive, cheated-upon Hillary Clinton to the pant-suited power woman who almost became POTUS. Look at Nita Ambani, the young, pretty school teacher who today is a very powerful businesswoman in her own right. Internationally, look at the sweet, eager-to-please English rose that was Diana Spencer, and then look at how she ‘womanned’ up into a self-confident dynamo of a woman, a power centre in her own right, a queen of hearts who still commands a powerful pull on the imagination of her people.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I was on this panel discussion about women’s empowerment recently, the type that happen on the fringes of ‘more important’ panel discussions about corruption, politics and money at every think-fest or lit-fest. We were talking about why the women’s reservation bill never gets passed and somebody said, “Please understand. The patriarchy loves the girl child. And they love young girls and young ladies. They are sweet, decorative, deferential and devoted. The only problem is that those sweet young girls grow into snarky old women like all of us on this panel. With opinions of our own, dried up wombs, no-nonsense bifocals instead of rose-tinted glasses, and no respect for anything except ability. That’s what the patriarchy can not abide.”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So, do men ‘man’ up, as well as women ‘woman’ up, as they age? I may be a bit biased here, but somehow, I do not think so. I think age weakens men, unlike women, who seem to grow stronger and more queenly with it—more Victorian, more Elizabethian, more Angela Merkel-ian.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And so, here’s to Priyanka’s late entry into politics. May she guffaw as loudly as Renuka Chowdhury, lay down the law as flatly as Mamata Banerjee, and show as much steel as her grandmother did. All us middle-aged auntiejis are rooting for her from our empty nests.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>Chauhan is an author and advertiser.</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/02/08/force-of-the-forties.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/02/08/force-of-the-forties.html Fri Feb 08 11:28:17 IST 2019 the-right-sexpert-is-here <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/01/25/the-right-sexpert-is-here.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/1/25/67-SEX-EDUCATION-new.jpg" /> <p>We all have read those furtive, slightly frantic letters that come out in the ask-the-sexpert section of the afternoon newspapers. You know what I mean, right?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“Dear doc, my penis is crooked. Will girls laugh at it?”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“Dear doc, I kissed a boy’s scrotum. When will the baby be born?”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>“Dear doctor, I masturbated. Afterwards I notice that my member seemed a centimetre smaller. My mother told me that a man’s member becomes smaller and smaller every time he commits the sin of masturbation. I live in fear of my member vanishing altogether, but I cannot stop masturbating.”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I have often wondered if the questions they ask are all made up—a way to get around the censors by pretending to be ‘medical’ while actually titillating readers. But they are all real, apparently. And, now, a frankly filthy, graphically gross, and touchingly vulnerable Netflix show called Sex Education—with the empowering slug line ‘experience is overrated’ and starring a sixteen-year-old male virgin who ends up playing sex therapist to his highly hormonal and ill-informed high school peers—is giving these distressed people all the information, reassurance and empathy they need.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The show is set in a small town in Britain, but is hugely informative for anybody, really—age and nationality no bar. It has been a huge hit around the world and what I personally found so heartening about it is that, by giving sex exactly the correct amount of importance (neither too much or too little) and by addressing every single awkward, icky, gross and weird problem non-judgmentally and head-on, it is helping youngsters around the world leave behind shame and secrecy, and rewrite the codes governing sexuality and how the genders interact with each other.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I binge-watched the entire series last night, exhausted and dispirited after sitting on (yet another) lit-fest panel discussion on #MeToo, where we all debated the same, tired issues—why these women did not speak up before, are men going to stop hiring women because women could slap #MeToo charges against them, what about Hardik Pandya, do proven predators need to be shamed or maimed, how can the legal system be given more teeth, blah blah blah. But, when I finished watching all eight episodes, I felt marvelously rebooted.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Sex Education makes consent sexy. It makes pleasuring your partner aspirational. It takes pressure off the boys to always be stoic alpha studs who can never lose or shed a tear. It gives girls agency, does not objectify them or pit them against each other. It reassures kids that being a virgin does not equal being a freak. It dispels the myth that everybody but you is constantly having huge amounts of amazingly gratifying sex and that you are ‘a sad loser who will die alone, swallowed by your pet python’.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Even better, it does it in a way that is extremely entertaining, and while being all about sex, is strangely not about sex at all. But rather about self-acceptance, genuine communication, trust, courage, notions of success and fears of failure, family ties and friendships. The stuff of life, really.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The series is only one season old, but it has set off a tremendous ripple. In this jaded world, torn apart by a 100 billion dollar pornography industry, with men and women being pitched against each other in attitudes of mistrust and mutual exploitation, where every interaction has become a minefield, the constitution governing sexual/gender interaction desperately needed to be rewritten. And, I think the writers-directors who have created this series may have unwittingly become some of the key founding fathers to have done that job.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>Chauhan is an author and advertiser.</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/01/25/the-right-sexpert-is-here.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/01/25/the-right-sexpert-is-here.html Fri Jan 25 18:55:03 IST 2019 not-an-accidental-flick <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/01/11/not-an-accidental-flick.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2019/1/11/68-Not-an-accidental-flick-new.jpg" /> <p>The poster of The Accidental Prime Minister makes me think of fancy dress competitions in junior school. You know, when your mum would put talcum power in your hair and fold her sari into two, tie it around your stomach and send you off to school as Indira Gandhi. If you were a boy, you would be stripped down to a little dhoti, have a flesh-coloured stocking stuck on your head, be given a pair of glasses and a long stick, and be instructed to murmur “Hey Ram” and keel over when the judges came over to talk to you.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Seriously, everybody on The Accidental Prime Minister poster looks like they are in fancy dress. Playing parliament-parliament. It is really weird. The inverted commas are just too much for me to handle. Like look, look, here comes ‘Priyanka’, complete with short, dark hair and a broadly bordered sari. She is talking to ‘Rahul’, who has dimples and a sneer. Here is ‘Soniaji’ with a ponytail, glasses and an Italian accent. And here is ‘Manmohan Singh’ walking around stiffly and speaking in a soft, hoarse voice and looking like a fatter-faced creepy sort of succubus of the real thing.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>They are even worse than the inverted commas in Sanju, which really blew my mind. A perfectly nice-looking young man, who can act really well, pretending to be this much less-attractive older man, who cannot act for toffee. And oopar se, that whole overdose of “good-hearted rogue-ishness” and “poor-little-rich-boyishness”, and many protestations about how they were not making a hagiography (they totally were).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>See, I have enjoyed some biopics. Like Dangal was nice (even though you knew the climax did not really happen that way) and Manto, and a while ago, Paan Singh Tomar. The songs from Bhaag Milkha Bhaag were lovely, and so was Farhan Akhtar’s body, even though the film managed to conveniently blame Pakistan for Milkha not getting an Olympics medal. I get that it is nice to be educated about the struggles and triumphs of underdog achievers from all kinds of fields. And, I totally understand that for actors looking for different (yet safe) roles, playing somebody famous and still-living could be seen as a challenge. So, I guess what I am objecting to is manipulative films, made with a mission to either whitewash or defame.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Anupam Kher was on TV recently, talking about The Accidental Prime Minister, and belligerently defending the timing of it, saying that “well, we release cricket-themed films around the World Cup and patriotic-themed films around Republic Day, so why cannot we release political-themed films around the elections?” And, of course, the interviewer was either too intimidated or too kiss-uppy to point out that “er, sir, that is because, unlike during the World Cup and Republic day, people vote during elections. So your film could directly influence the way in which way they vote, and surely that is irresponsible!”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But, he is not alone, is he? There is also Thackeray timed to release about now, and yesterday there was an absolutely ghastly image of Vivek Oberoi all dressed up as Narendra Modi. His look was so off that if there had been no words below the image—saying PM Narendra Modi—I would have thought it is a film about Shirdi-waale Sai Baba. Or Willie Nelson. Or Santa Claus.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>On the other hand, what am I getting so worked up about? It is the era of fake news; lavish biopics starring big actors are the latest way to rewrite history and control the narrative, and the people who can afford to fund them are funding them. It is not very different from paying Beyonce to dance at your son’s wedding, really.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/01/11/not-an-accidental-flick.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2019/01/11/not-an-accidental-flick.html Fri Jan 11 11:43:48 IST 2019 hammer-out-a-fresh-script-modiji <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/12/29/hammer-out-a-fresh-script-modiji.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/12/29/75-Hammer-out-new.jpg" /> <p>What a ghastly year it is been for the superstar trinity.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Salman Khan mincingly did his usual all-strut, no-sense routine and ended up at the losing end of the Race. Aamir rode a donkey, wore blue-eyeliner, aped a Hollywood star and fed drugged ladoos to Englishmen who spoke to each other in Urdu, even when they were alone. Most recently, Shah Rukh Khan shrunk himself down to four feet six inches, and played a cocky thirty-eight-year-old dwarf and romanced two of the nation’s beautiful women before departing on a space mission to Mars.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The audience was not impressed either by Salman’s lazy/safe more-of-the-same offering or the gimmicky outlandish fare the other two put out and showed its annoyance at having its Diwali and Christmas ruined by ungratefully not showing up at the theatres.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The empty seats clearly stated that the audience is done with superficial, one-tone drivel that presumes to take it for granted. Do not think that you can just do gora-bashing and I’ll love you, it is telling Aamir. Do not assume that if you sport stubble, boots, dark glasses and do a new dance step I’ll love you, they are telling Salman. Dimples can only do so much, it’s quite frankly telling Shah Rukh.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I have been there, cheered for that, tired of it, and now I’m craving substance.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>(This the point when everybody turns around and blames the writers. But please understand that writers are the most bullied people in the movie business, and the primary reason they churn out drivel is not because they are only capable of writing drivel, but because the stars are making them write drivel and they are too much in awe of the stars to say no.)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>This is the reason why any number of movies featuring non-stars like Rajkummar Rao, Vicky Kaushal and Ayushmann Khurrana have done so well this year. These are all small, rooted, solid, sincerely made films, without goodies or baddies, made by people with mutual respect for each other, and no superstar bloating the budget.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The parallel with politics easily writes itself.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Mizoram and Telangana resoundingly rejected the stale, formulaic, good guys vs bad guys rhetoric of the fifty-six inch chested, tried and tested superstar Narendra Modi and left his hit-making production studio, the BJP, totally red-faced.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>As usual the star is being praised for trying to rise valiantly above a sloppy script, and the writers are being blamed for all that sloppiness. Nobody is mentioning the fact that the writers wrote originally about development. And then had to sit by sadly as their plot was arrogantly hijacked by quickie-fix tracks featuring evil, cow-killing Muslims, mandirs, gigantic statues, and luridly coloured currency…</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So please huddle with your core team of writers again, Modiji. Listen to them and hammer out a fresh, sound script with a grand theme, a neatly defined first, second and third act, plus a killer climax. Spread out to last over a period of five years. Then stick to that script. Do not get derailed because your ratings slip on a certain Friday. Stay steady. If you have committed yourself to development—then work hard and sincerely towards giving the audience development instead of trying to sex things up by randomly turning on beef-eaters or menstruating ladies. Remember, focus, dedication and no dicking with the script will win the day.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>(Also, writers, please have the gumption to stand your ground.)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>You do not want that Ayushmann Khurrana of politics, that unlikely, puppy-faced Rahul Gandhi and his ensemble cast to run away with the Filmfare Trophy, do you?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/12/29/hammer-out-a-fresh-script-modiji.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/12/29/hammer-out-a-fresh-script-modiji.html Sat Dec 29 11:18:11 IST 2018 reaching-for-our-reserves <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/12/14/reaching-for-our-reserves.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/12/14/70-Reaching-for-our-reserves-new.jpg" /> <p>So, Urijit Patel has left the (nation) building. Initially, we all naturally assumed that he threw a hissy fit because he felt that the new turquoise blue 50 rupee note was not in quite the same swaggy league of awesomeness as the chocolate brown tenner, the bhagwa-orange two hundred, and the cool, indigo blue hunner. And that as colour and size of currency is the most important fiscal issue our nation faces, and as the bright green option Urijit was reported to prefer was just too Islamic in tone for a Hindu Rashtra, GOI was not willing to accommodate his quibbles….</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But now it is being whispered that he probably quit because GOI was gunning for the RBI’s contingency reserves, and planning to use them to hand out populist sops and basically present a better picture of how our economy is doing ahead of the national elections. But as without its reserves, the Reserve Bank of India would cease to be the Reserve Bank of India, Urijit said ‘uh huh, no can do.’</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And so, just like it happened with his very able predecessor, Urijit ka pack-up.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>(Btw, a film based on the surgical strikes being carried out by GOI against India’s contingency reserves has already been shot and readied for release by Bollywood. The trailer has just released. It is called Uri.)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Fasten your seat belts for the free roller-coaster ride people, the good days are finally here. In fact they have been goodish for a while. 2018 began with four Supreme Court justices calling a press conference to draw attention to the government’s interference with the way cases were being allocated, and it is ending with this latest resignation by the head of the RBI. Along the way there were issues with high-ranking officers from the CBI and the Election Commission. These are all highly qualified professionals, men and women of intelligence and experience. When none of them can work with a government, it suggests that said government is exhibiting both high-handedness and low IQ, and repeatedly picking the expedient/populist short-term option over long-term nation-building. And that it is zooming into one key institution of Indian democracy after another, and—like an idiot child with an all access pass—banging them against the wall, and knocking the stuffing out of them, and generally phailaoing the raita, simply because it can.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In short, we thought the movie based on the Modi sarkar’s five years in power would be titled Glory Days, but it is turning out to be Dunston Checks In.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Of course it is not all just ignorance and arrogance. There is prejudice and hatred in the mix too, lots of low cunning, and an agenda of divisiveness and hate.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But we are used to hate in India. Every single party has in one way or the other used caste, religion and ethnicity to split us into voting silos, and yet, we have managed to survive it because at the end of the day, we are all still suckers for the unity-in-diversity narrative. Fond as we are of Ram Lalla, we are also pretty taken up with another devastatingly cute toddler, a product of two generations of ‘love jihad’, Taimur Ali Khan.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Anyway, I think that in seeking to access our figurative ‘crowd jewels’, GOI might have really gone too far. In Hindi movie parlance, this is truly izzat pe haath daalna. We will tolerate many things, we will eat chicken instead of mutton and we sing along to rejigged, syrupy renditions of our national anthem (another classic case of fixing what ain’t broke) and we will nod along while you lynch a few minority citizens, rename cities, and build vulgar statues that nobody asked for, but at the end of the day, chindi hain hum. Reach for our emergency reserves and we may finally snarl ‘enough’ and toss you over.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/12/14/reaching-for-our-reserves.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/12/14/reaching-for-our-reserves.html Fri Dec 14 17:15:32 IST 2018 slogging-hard-for-slogans <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/11/27/slogging-hard-for-slogans.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/11/27/62-slogans-new.jpg" /> <p>Having spent more than 20 years selling colas, chips and chocolate, I have a healthy respect for catchy slogans. I still remember the frisson I felt the first time I heard ‘Bolo mere lips, I love Uncle Chipps.’ My shallow, copy-trainee brain instinctively knew it was in the presence of deathless, immortal prose. That feeling of lip-smacking yumminess, of spice and salt and crunch and saliva all blending into one, and of course, the reassuring neatness of the rhyming—all conspired to create the perfect slogan. I decided on the spot that this would be the yardstick I would measure all my advertising writing against.</p> <p>Good slogans always give you frisson. That is French for shiver—but it is more than just shiver. It means a sort of quivering skin-orgasm, complete with hair standing up at the back of your neck and pupil dilation. ‘Jana gana mana’ gives us all frisson, I am sure. So does ‘Jai Ho’ at the end of Slumdog Millionaire.</p> <p>Good slogans should also always be a little tongue-in-cheek, or they run the risk of taking themselves too seriously. And finally (and most critically if we are talking about political slogans, which we are), good slogans should also invoke some larger insight, channel the zeitgeist, reverberate with what is in the hearts and heads of people.</p> <p>There are several contenders for the top slot when it comes to the best political slogan of India. The simple, spartan ‘Jai jawan jai kisan’, (Glory to the soldier, glory to the farmer) coined by Lal Bahadur Shastri in 1965, which enthused soldiers to defend India and urged farmers to do their best to increase the production of food grains to reduce dependence on import, deserves special mention.</p> <p>For sheer epic-ness and Rajinikanth-esque swag you simply can’t beat ‘Ek sherni sau langoor, Chikmagalur, Chikmagalur!’ (one tigress, a hundred monkeys, that’s the scenario in the by-election in Chikmagalur). In one simple sentence it reduced Indira Gandhi’s opposition to a bunch of cartoons and confirmed that no matter how deep patriarchy runs in India’s veins, reverence for the mother goddess runs even deeper.</p> <p>There have been some cutsie slogans (rhymes about aaloo and Lalu come to mind), some that channelled caste angst (tilak, tarazoo aur talwar, inko maaro joote chaar ie, beat the bearers of swords, scales and tilaks with shoes), there have been deeply disturbing images of naked mothers in Imphal crying ‘Indian Army Rape us’, there has been talk of chests that are 56 inches wide and all kinds of tired two-liners about haath-and-saath, baar-and-sarkaar, but for sheer nation-shaking, mould-breaking subversiveness nothing quite packs the poisonous punch of L.K. Advani’s ‘Mandir Wahin Banaaengay’. (we will build the temple there only, ‘there’ being the site of the Babri mosque.)</p> <p>Aaah, what a slogan that was. Along with Salman Khan and Boomer bubble gum, it ruled the nineties. It gave me frisson even though I hadn’t been inside a temple more than four times in my entire, fauji-brat life. Featuring ecstatic, muscular bhakts egging us on to break down a mosque all in the name of a sweet-faced, blue-skinned cherubic baby-God, it shook the country like nothing before or since.</p> <p>And now, as always happens when the new slogans fail us, the BJP seems to be returning to its hit golden oldie. But this is 2019, not 1990, and I am not sure a remixed version of an old hit, even one featuring a rap solo by Mohan Bhagwat, can do the job. Meanwhile the Congress, after several false starts and a lot of talk of ‘Love’, seems to have finally stumbled on to a potentially winning slogan—‘Chowkidar Chor Hai’ (The security guard is a thief.) If used consistently, in context, sans hiccups or random winks, it may just be ironical and damning enough to do the job.&nbsp;</p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/11/27/slogging-hard-for-slogans.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/11/27/slogging-hard-for-slogans.html Thu Feb 14 11:09:08 IST 2019 where-suraiyya-slays <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/11/16/where-suraiyya-slays.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/11/16/128-where-suraiyya-slays-new.jpg" /> <p>In this column, I have held forth a lot on item numbers, mostly fuming against the crassness and the objectification contained in their lyrics and choreography. Lines like “I am a tandoori chicken, wash me down with alcohol...” from Fevicol Se, “Juicy lips, oh your juicy lips...” from Hoth Rasiley, and “I am buttery Chameli, I have secretly downed a peg of whiskey and come here...” [Chikni Chameli] have given me particular pain.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I mean, why is the woman describing herself as a fast food accompaniment to alcohol, to be chewed, digested and excreted the next day? Why did somebody whom the press insists on describing as a ‘Bollywood A-lister’ agree to dance to it? Why the need to wax eloquent on the juiciness of lips, while making suggestive gestures? Why the fetishising of a woman who drinks in secret? And why can she not just have her wretched peg of whiskey out in the open like a normal person?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It seems to me that item songs usually follow one of two formats: 1) the item girl throws herself at a man and he rejects her, and she pouts and slithers around him and tries to woo him while he remains impervious to her charms (Kajra Re); 2) the item girl gives the snooty, full-on high maintenance ones, while a group of men salivate around her, indulging in patently fake desperately smitten behaviour. These item songs usually end with the item girl doing something utterly predictable like going off tamely with the main man, whoever he is, or scurrying for cover with her musicians because a big fight scene is beginning, or being kidnapped, or dying cheaply while trying to save the hero/slay the villain in some sort of climactic crossfire.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And that is why I am utterly charmed by the freshness of Suraiyya from Thugs of Hindostan. She lives alone in a plush haveli/kotha, calls all the shots in this establishment (no bossy madam or greasy pimp-uncle in sight) and has absolutely no soft corner for our hero. When a band of harried freedom fighters comes to her haveli looking for a safe hiding place, she agrees to let them stay, declaring, “I do not believe in slavery. Nobody should be a slave, either of their loved ones, or of the British.” That had me on my feet and whistling faster than any shot of any Bollywood hero taking his shirt off and flashing a poorly defined, starved-looking six-pack. I mean, Wah! Wah! Good on you, Suraiyya Jaan! In the eighteenth century, you had already imbibed the insights Indian advertising and Mother’s Horlicks are discovering only today.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Of course, she is just a bit player in this strange, solemn movie. But she definitely has the best bits! The lyrics of her item song feel strong and have agency. (Good on you, Amitabh Bhattacharya.) She gets to sing some pretty sassy lines to her ‘smitten’ paramour: “I have met you, I have fed you, I have sung for you, now what else can I possibly do? Should I have your child, and pack it up, and hand it to you?”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I must confess that I thought she was going to die—and that the gaily sung line, “Suraiyya jaan degi kya... (Should Suraiyya give her life for you...)” was some sort of bitter-sweet foreshadowing of that tragic moment. But I am happy to report that I was fully wrong.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>At the end of the song, instead of conspiring to conceal the identity of her suitor (Aamir Khan in a blond wig, in a whites-only club, which has issued shoot-at-sight orders against all Indian trespassers) she whips off his wig, revealing his true identity to the audience packed with goras and plunging him into dire peril, with a sweet pout and a shrug, and absolutely no remorse whatsoever.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It was truly a subversive moment in the item girl’s narrative. We should celebrate it as such.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b><a href="mailto:editor@theweek.in">editor@theweek.in</a></b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/11/16/where-suraiyya-slays.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/11/16/where-suraiyya-slays.html Sat Nov 17 16:06:19 IST 2018 hindus-are-losing-patience <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/11/03/hindus-are-losing-patience.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/11/3/62-Hindus-new.jpg" /> <p>Uff, got so supremely riled seeing this Giriraj Singh person, union minister for medium, small and micro-enterprises, pull a lugubrious face after the whole wretched Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid shit-fest got stirred up yet again because of the Supreme Court’s adjournment of the hearing to January, and voice his entirely fake ‘concern’ that “Hindus are losing their patience. I fear for what will happen if Hindus lose their patience….”</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Firstly, what the hell are you doing pulling a long face and ‘fearing’ the consequences? Surely, as a member of the elected government, it is your job to ensure there ARE no consequences? What is with the standing by and the hand-wringing?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Secondly, please do not even pretend that all you want is for Ram Lalla to be happily re-ensconced in his rightful birthplace. You do not. Because, if he is indeed so re-ensconced, you will basically lose your shit-stirring stick. Or at least a few inches of it. And then people may actually turn to you and ask why, now that Ram Lalla’s status has been correctly updated, honey is not pouring down from the sky and the rupee is not yet equal to the dollar? And you will have to explain, waving your suddenly shortened stick, that this is because evil Muslim squatters still have control over Hindu temples in Kashi and Mathura. And all that work to do all over again.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Thirdly, your ‘concern’ is nothing less than an open threat. You are telling all the minorities in this country—‘urban Naxals’ like myself included—that we should all shut up and allow ourselves lesser and lesser space in public discourse, even as women are kept out of Sabarimala, minorities are lynched for eating beef, and laws are openly flouted, or some sinisterly awful thing will happen to us. You do not specify what. It is so much more effective to hint at the horrors to come and just leave things vague. As the makers of scary movies from It to Stree well know, the moment the monster is fully revealed, it stops being bone-chillingly frightening and starts to seem silly, pathetic even, and like it should really get a life.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Coming to Shashi Tharoor’s recent remarks, which is what got your khakis into such a twist in the first place, I have to admit that I have never actually seen a scorpion sitting on a shivling. (What a gloriously evocative image, btw!) But I have seen a colony of black ants trooping along one. The temple pujari noticed them, uttered a small, untroubled tsk-tsk-tsk sound, filled a plastic mug to the brim with Gangajal and poured it all in one sharp motion over the shivling, cleansing it instantly. So simple, na?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So please use your medium, small or micro-sized intelligence to understand that it is you and your ilk whom sensible Hindus are losing patience with.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>We are starting to lose patience because you are trying to bang the same old drum hoping to get us to sing the same, sad tune. We are starting to lose patience with the fact that no matter how much you claim to hate all things western, you are most faithful imbibers of all things vilayati (foreign), including the sickening, cynical policy of divide and rule.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>We are losing patience with Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan not making India any cleaner, and Beti Bachao... not saving the lives of any daughters and sisters. We are losing patience with a government that was voted in on a progress platform and has not delivered the jobs, trade and development-for-all that it promised.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And, you are indeed very right to fear the consequences of what will happen if we do.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/11/03/hindus-are-losing-patience.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/11/03/hindus-are-losing-patience.html Sat Nov 10 19:09:45 IST 2018 siding-with-ye-olde-patriarchy <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/10/20/siding-with-ye-olde-patriarchy.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/10/20/35-Siding-new.jpg" /> <p>Wow, nice one GOI. Just when we were all wondering where you stood on the vital issue of women being molested and harassed in the workplace, you made your stand abundantly clear. By not saying a word in support of the accusations being hurled at your junior minister for external affairs by an avalanche of respected women journalists, and by standing behind him staunchly, you have sent out an unequivocal message that as far as it comes to #MeToo, you stand with the molesters.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And thus, it has been proved that in Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao India, behind every woman who would be successful, stands a man who would molest her if he can get away with it, and behind him stands a government who is chill with this. Good to know.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So why is the BJP doing this? Surely it could have thrown this man—not an insider, not somebody with deep roots within the party and inconveniently named after a Mughal emperor to boot—to the wolves? Why did it instead decide to not make him into a scapegoat, to not expeditiously shed him like a lizard sheds its tail and to not win easy brownie points from women and the liberal media?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I cannot pretend to know what goes inside the torturous minds of the men who run the BJP. (And rest assured, they are all men, nary an empowered nari amongst them—not Sushma Swaraj, supposedly MJ Akbar’s direct boss, not Nirmala Sitharaman, not Smriti Irani, not Maneka Gandhi—some of whom have made statements saying we must believe the women coming out with names with #MeToo.) But I can hazard a guess.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>My guess is that the BJP’s finger is unerringly, as always, on the most populist of pulses. It is siding with the rump. And the rump is comprised of ye olde patriarchy; of old aunties who are querulously asking, “But why have these women stayed silent for 30 years? Why come out now? What is their motive?”; of ‘let’s-be-rational’ men, concerned about the fact that “a man’s entire career and good name could be destroyed by a single woman’s carelessly uttered accusation, one backed with no proof whatsoever”. (Duh, what do you think has been happening to women for millennia? How many of us have had our reputations destroyed by one man’s casual, selfish action? What do you think happened to Queen Sita, cast out of her kingdom in disgrace just because she was careless enough to get kidnapped by a predator?)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Yes, make no mistake about it, the BJP has chosen, deliberately and consciously, to side with the silent majority. With the moral police. With the no-going-out-after-eight-pm status quo. With the ‘sleeveless kurta equals slut’ brigade. With the must-have-slept-with-somebody-to-get-to-the-top chorus.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And so, 97 lawyers from top legal firm Karanjawal and Co will take on one slender woman journalist with nothing to gain and everything to lose. And, in an exact mirroring of the oh-oh-poor-Hindu-majority-being-held-hostage-by-the-evil-Muslim and-Christian-minority narrative, they will set out to glibly persuade us that it is they who are the David and she who is the Goliath.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In that sense, Mr Bathrobe—as he has scathingly been nicknamed by his latest accuser—is correct. #MeToo, can, if correctly massaged, manipulated and stoked, go from being a minor, elitist storm-in-a-C-cup to being a full-blown election issue.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Indeed, by standing silently and stolidly with Mr Bathrobe and others of his ilk, and thus reassuring the patriarchy that all will be well under its reign, the BJP is deliberately ensuring that it does.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/10/20/siding-with-ye-olde-patriarchy.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/10/20/siding-with-ye-olde-patriarchy.html Mon Oct 22 10:10:46 IST 2018 metoo-conditions-apply <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/10/05/metoo-conditions-apply.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/10/5/93-metoo-conditions-apply-new.jpg" /> <p>Thank God for Tanushree Dutta. Just when the pressure on us as a society, and Bollywood as an industry, to take a stand on the #MeToo movement was getting un-ignorable, she came along with her middlingly gross (but not troublingly gruesome) allegations against a has-been like Nana Patekar, whom there is not much risk in alienating, and everybody could finally be with it, and flaunt some cool #MeToo swank on their social media.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>We are outraged by what has happened to Tanushree Dutta, the bold(er) amongst the Bollywood brigade is now tweeting indignantly. How dare Nana not understand that na means na? We will not stand for it! #MeToo! #MeToo!</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Good for them, of course, and kudos to Tanushree who really seems to have had a harrowing time, and deserves all the support she can get.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But, I cannot help wondering that if Tanushree’s harasser had been some big-time movie-mogul-type moneybag—a Harvey Weinstein equivalent say, or a reigning superstar with his fingers in a dozen films, or a member of what they always call the “first families of Bollywood”—instead of a soft target like the over-the-hill outsider Patekar, all her “supporters” would have kept mum? Like they have done so many many times in the past? When powerful men have abused women, verbally, physically, emotionally, and gotten away with it? Or, even been admired for it, with their fan clubs bad-mouthing the women concerned and cheering their hero’s every move? (This is not an article for a filmy magazine, so, I will spare you the spicy stories. Besides, I am pretty sure you know them. We all do—we do not even have to read them, they just seep into our subconscious mind from the air itself, like tuberculosis.)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Or, maybe, I am being too harsh on the bold(er) brigade. I mean, when compared with old-school-industry wallah like Amitabh Bachchan, they even seem decidedly courageous. It was just so distasteful to see the “Big B” being asked what he made of the issue, and when he replied with a counter question (“Am I Tanushree Dutta? Am I Nana Patekar? No, right? So, why are you asking me this question?”), the gathered crowd responded with loud cheers and delighted applause. I could not understand what they were applauding exactly. The actor’s dialogue delivery (impeccable as always)? Or, his dismissive ‘I don’t want to get involved’ stance (craven, as always)? Everybody just... laughed along. Nobody pressed the question, nobody said, but sir, you have made films like Pink, you have mouthed dialogues like “No means No”, surely you must have a take on this issue? The mic was meekly passed along to Aamir Khan who said he was not equipped to comment as he did not know the details of the case, but that he would say that such incidents are “very sad”.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>When compared with this level of abdication, the bold(er) brigade does seem to be sticking something out—if not its neck, then at least a French-manicured fingernail or a lock of hair extensions.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>For now, it seems, we will have to be content with that.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But, if we want to see the sort of battle that is raging in the US, with women everywhere rallying together to speak their truth to power, constantly, unapologetically reminding the patriarchy that they vote, and wrestling hard to wield some agency back into their lives, then we will have to dig deeper and grow braver.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Otherwise, on #MeToo, we just come across sounding just tokenistic, wannabe and me-too.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/10/05/metoo-conditions-apply.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/10/05/metoo-conditions-apply.html Fri Oct 05 18:57:44 IST 2018 serena-williams-and-the-lure-of-the-victim-card <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/09/21/serena-williams-and-the-lure-of-the-victim-card.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/9/21/72-lure-of-the-victim-card-new.jpg" /> <p>The Serena Williams-Carlos Ramos-Naomi Osaka triangle has played out on our screens and papers for over a week now, and it has been pretty polarising. Some feel she was the victim of genuine sexism and racism, and some feel she just lost her cool and then tried to obfuscate the issue by playing the ‘black’ and ‘woman’ cards, while the much younger Osaka displayed both grit and grace to score a well-deserved win.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I must confess I am with the second lot on this one. I found it hard to believe that a person who was paid $600 (Carlos) for the match could bully a person who was playing for a minimum of $1,850,000 (the runner’s-up winnings). It was gutsy of him to stand his ground so doggedly, especially as she swore she would see to it that he would never umpire another one of her matches. Most Indian petty officials would have crumbled into a obsequious heap at the threat. Correction, most would not have called her out in the first place.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In 2012, when Shah Rukh Khan got into a scuffle with a security guard at the Wankhede stadium, the star claimed that the security was “manhandling little girls, not even 13, under the pretext of performing security duties” and that “some people get cheap thrills by acting obnoxious with celebrities”. While this could definitely be true, perhaps the guy was just doing his duty (as celebrated in about half-a-dozen Tata chai ads, but hardly ever in real life), and the celebrity could have been the one at fault.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Entitlement is definitely not cool. And to be fair, most stars do try to stay as grounded as possible. (It must be tough though, with fans gushing at you constantly, assuring you that it is your brilliance and light alone that illuminates the planet.) Maybe that is why, when they are caught being entitled, they are themselves appalled and try to wriggle out of the situation by making it about larger, loftier issues. This sucks, because it is actively harmful to the cause you are trying to ‘stand up for’—sexism and racism, in the first case, and manhandling little girls, not even 13, in the second.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Obfuscation and the magician’s trick of forcing a ‘card’ upon us, has gotten really popular recently. The film Sanju took it to an all-new level, presenting to us a lofty tale of a bumbling, more-sinned-against-than-sinning, large-hearted celebrity who was used by the ‘evil media’ to ‘sell newspapers’.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Mani Shankar Aiyar did the BJP a huge service by placing the poor-me-son-of-a-chaiwalla card in Narendra Modi’s hands in 2014 when he made his infamous “Modi can never be PM, but is welcome to sell chai at the Congress Summit” jab. The BJP played it for all it was worth, capturing the national imagination, even though Modiji had left his chaiwalla days behind decades ago, and had been in the extremely privileged position of chief minister for a good 15 years.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Even Rahul Gandhi, in a daring new move, seems, tentatively, to be playing the ‘Pappu’ card. Witness his recent, impassioned “Aap mujhe kuch bhi bulao; Pappu bhi bulao. Mein aapko tabh bhi pyaar karoonga” [You can call me anything; call me Pappu, even. I will still show you love]. Am sure this pitch will find resonance in the hearts of under-performing millennials everywhere.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Wow, so much card playing. And, it isn’t even Diwali season yet.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/09/21/serena-williams-and-the-lure-of-the-victim-card.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/09/21/serena-williams-and-the-lure-of-the-victim-card.html Fri Sep 21 17:18:52 IST 2018 predators-in-sacred-spaces <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/09/07/predators-in-sacred-spaces.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/9/7/92-predators-new.jpg" /> <p>The irony is scalding, shaming and total. Ariana Grande, a successful, empowered young woman of today, a globally known youth icon, no less, was blatantly groped while a million cameras rolled, in the presence of an ex-president of the United States and countless other powerful folk, by the officiating bishop at the funeral service of Aretha Franklin, an even more successful female icon whose most famous single is about a woman asking a man to show her (just a little bit) of respect.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>While he was doing the groping, Bishop Charles Ellis III—former presiding bishop of the Pentecostal Assemblies of the World—also took it upon himself to tell Ariana that he had never heard of her, and that when he saw her name on the programme, he though she was ‘a new item on the Taco Bell menu’. Ha ha ha. Having thus advertised both his bumptious ignorance, and his casual, deeply ingrained racism, he then went on to patronisingly declare that he was impressed by her singing and that she was ‘an icon in her own right’.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Uh, Charles, she has four Grammy nominations, global fame, and a net worth of $45 million. She does not need you to vouch for her. Also, till you shot into the limelight for groping somebody young enough to be your granddaughter, certainly none of us in this corner of the world had heard of you.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Just as you would have expected, about half the people who were watching were deeply offended and took to Twitter to voice their disgust—at the fact that Grande’s dress was too short for church.</p> <p>Yes, that was their main peeve, apparently.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Thankfully, the other, saner half demanded an apology from the bishop (which has just, reluctantly, been issued) and linked the incident to the #ChurchToo movement, which has followed close on the heels of the #MeToo movement, where more and more ex-seminarians, ex-altar boys, ex-priests and serving priests have come forward to speak of abuse at the hands of their seniors, the most high-profile case being the one involving Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, the former archbishop of the Catholic Church’s Washington archdiocese.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Mona Eltahawy, the Egyptian-American feminist/journalist, has started a #MosqueMeToo movement too, where thousands of women have come forward to report abuse during their Haj travel to Saudi Arabia. They talked about being groped even as they circle the Kaaba seven times in Mecca, by male fellow-pilgrims, security officers and ‘holy’ men.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In India, so many believers have similar stories about predators in sacred spaces. Jovial, smiling, ‘holy’ men with roving hands. Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh. Asaram Bapu. Bishops, maulanas, granthis and sadhus. The list is endless and cuts across all faiths.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So why do these molestations happen? Not because somebody’s dress was ‘too short for church’ for sure. They happen because believers willingly ceded power to these middlemen. They accepted that somehow, this ‘holy’ class was greater—higher—closer to God than the rest of humanity. Practically Gods themselves, and so beyond human accountability—and that the rules that apply to everybody else do not apply to them.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>This is the mistake. The same rules need to apply to everybody. If you would not leave your child alone with a stranger, please do not leave him alone with a priest. You are not being disrespectful if you do this, you are just being sensible.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Frankly, the sooner believers realise that they do not need a middleman to communicate with their Maker, that spiritual breakthroughs do not happen through rituals and incense and group frenzies, that there are no shortcuts nor power-brokers on the road to salvation, the safer our young ones will be.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/09/07/predators-in-sacred-spaces.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/09/07/predators-in-sacred-spaces.html Tue Sep 11 18:19:47 IST 2018 its-not-the-women-silly <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/08/24/its-not-the-women-silly.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/8/24/68-its-not-the-women-silly-new.jpg" /> <p>So, apparently, the floods in Kerala are a heavenly intervention, brought down upon an ungodly people for committing the transgression of allowing women-who-menstruate into the Sabarimala temple. That makes complete sense, actually. Because paradise was lost because silly woman #1 Eve ate the apple from the tree of knowledge and gave it to her husband, too; that poor sucker who clearly had no will of his own. And, the entire Ramayan happened because silly woman #2 Kekayee allowed her ears to be poisoned by evil woman #1 Manthara, thus paving the way for evil woman #2 Surpnakha to hit on the righteous Lakshman, which led to silly woman #3 Sita sticking her foot out of the Lakshman rekha and getting herself kidnapped. The Mahabharat happened because Duryodhan mistook a pond for a polished marble floor and fell into it and silly/evil woman #1 Draupadi laughed at him.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And, the universe is full of woe because silly/evil woman #2 Pandora opened the box that released all the evils of humanity into the world. The Trojan war happened because evil woman #3 Eris, the goddess of chaos, chucked an apple titled ‘To the Fairest’ to silly women #4 #5 and #6—Hera, Athena and Aphrodite—and they fought like wildcats over it. And, India lost the World Cup semi-final in 2015 simply because silly/evil Anushka Sharma showed up in the stands and distracted honest, hard-working Virat, causing him to take his eye off the ball. Also, when affairs happen, it is always the single other woman who is dubbed a ‘home-breaker’, but her married lover is never dubbed a ‘home-betrayer’. And when a woman gives birth to a girl child again and again even after repeated attempts and abortions, it is always her fault even though it is the male chromosome that decides the sex of the foetus. And when a man beats his wife, it is always because she wasn’t quick enough to serve him his food, or she answered back too saucily or because she looked at another man with lust. And, women get raped again and again in our cities and villages because they insist on wandering about, laughing, eating chow mein and are never quick enough to address all potential rapists as bhaiya.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Basically, woman are either evil or silly (or both), and everything bad that happens in the world is their fault.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So, may be, if women-who-menstruate say a sincere enough sorry and vow not to tempt Lord Ayyappa in his bachelor digs forever, then the flood waters will recede and all the Army and the funding that’s being ‘poured’ into Kerala can be sent back to guard our borders and build immense steel statues of freedom fighters whose ideals we have forgotten, but whose names we continuously invoke.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The other theory doing the rounds is that the flood hit Kerala because it is full of (evil) Christians and Muslims who (along with all these menstruating Hindu women who want to barge into Sabarimala) deserve to be drowned. This silly/evil theory is on par with the claim that the 2004 Tsunami hit Indonesia because it was “full of Muslims” and Thailand because it was “full of sin and paedophilia”.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The truth is that Kerala is reeling under the flood for a series of complex reasons, some man-made, some natural. No ‘angry God’ caused the deluge, and the healing work that needs to be done cannot be conveniently outsourced to Him either. We humans will have to do our bit, working together with generosity, determination, genius and jugaad.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/08/24/its-not-the-women-silly.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/08/24/its-not-the-women-silly.html Fri Aug 24 15:28:42 IST 2018 no-room-for-factual-journalism <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/08/10/no-room-for-factual-journalism.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/8/10/88-no-room-for-factual-journalism-new.jpg" /> <p>Would you agree that it is kinda lame to google yourself? Like, all the time? Every single day? As in you get up every morning and google images, news, videos and web mentions of yourself? And if somebody has said anything negative about you, then you hound them and pressurise them till they retract?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>If you knew somebody who did that, you would think they were totally self-obsessed, or pretty sad, or paranoid-schizophrenic, or really need to get a life, right?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Which is why I am so creeped out by the allegation that the Modi government has created a 200-member monitoring team within the ministry of information and broadcasting, which monitors what all the channels in India are saying about it. Based on its report, three officials of deputy secretary rank prepare a report which is sent to the I&amp;B minister, who activates the officials at the PMO, who then send their directives to the editors of the news channels about what they think of the channel’s reportage. If the editor does not take their ‘feedback’ on board, his proprietor is spoken to. And then, if the editor still proves recalcitrant, like in the case of former managing editor Milind Khandekar and Masterstroke anchor Punya Prasun Bajpai of ABP news, exits happen.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>All this came out because, about a month ago, the Narendra Modi government set up a NaMo App video conference in which the prime minister interacted with farmers across India.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>I remember tuning in expecting it to be like Krishi Darshan, but it turned out to be more Kardashian in flavour. Because, right through it, our PM was channeling his inner Bachchan. He talked to the farmers in exactly the same homey, jokey, paternalistic manner that Bachchan adopts while talking to contestants on Kaun Banega Crorepati.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>During the ‘chat’, one sweet lady named Chandramani Kaushik, from the impoverished district of Kanker, Chhattisgarh, claimed that her income had increased ‘from Rs 50 per kilo, to Rs 700’—thanks to switching from paddy farming to custard apple aka Sita-phal farming. Truly, Sita mata ki jai ho!</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So cynical are the times we live in, that this innocent statement prompted the above-mentioned Bajpai and Khandekar to send out a journalist into the wilds of Kanker to find out if Chandramani’s claim was actually true.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Why couldn’t they just do what all the other news channels do? Send out a phalanx of OB vans manned by cameramen and technicians to the homes of the powerful and the opinionated in the big cities, and get them to snipe at each other all evening on those noisy echo chambers they call ‘news panels’? Why send out actual journalists into the hinterland and dig up actual news? That too, not in English, the language spoken by a tiny minority in the urban bubbles, but in all-important, game-changing, shit-stirring Hindi?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The Masterstroke journalist went into Kanker not once, but twice, and came back with video footage in which Chandramani and her fellow lady farmers admitted that uh, the Sita-phal earnings are perhaps a little er…premature, and that actually, they have not earned anything yet, in fact, they have had to fork out money from their own pockets to get the Sita-phal farming started.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But, this wasn’t Masterstroke’s worst offence. It was getting its TRPs to rise. People started watching the show. And so, the ads magically dried up, satellite uplinks began malfunctioning, and finally, exit Bajpai and Khandekar.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Meanwhile, ‘krishi ban gaya crorepati’ continues to play out on our screens, hosted by our homey, jokey, papa-PM. But, viewers are wisening up. Going forward, the 200-member team of dedicated ‘self-googlers’ may find more and more reports, that (like too much Sita-phal) will give them severe indigestion.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/08/10/no-room-for-factual-journalism.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/08/10/no-room-for-factual-journalism.html Fri Aug 10 16:53:49 IST 2018 love-is-the-new-sword <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/07/26/love-is-the-new-sword.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/7/26/51-love-is-the-new-sword-new.jpg" /> <p>Seems the Congress has got its big campaign idea for 2019 all figured out—abki baar, pyaar hi pyaar. Love seems to be the big idea they are zooming into, thus hoping to reposition the BJP and force a simple binary upon the public. The BJP is hate, and the Congress is love. Who are you gonna pick?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It is an audacious idea, very timely, with roots deep in our religious texts, our freedom struggle and our blatantly melodramatic movies. And, with ‘true love’s first hug’ they have certainly gotten off to a flying start. The gesture was both an eyeball grabber and a ball grabber, it made headlines and went viral with a vengeance. In a country with 22 official languages and short attention spans, symbolism is a powerful, even vital weapon, and the Congress finally seems to have understood that. The BJP is frantically trying to play down #thehug, but the fact remains that this is the most dramatic and successfully theatrical the Congress has been since Sonia Gandhi ‘sacrificed the post of prime minister at the prompting of the inner voice of her conscience’. In the very short term, at least, it looks like #thehug has captured public imagination, and has dented Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s impregnable, untouchable aura. I have not seen him look so rattled since Karan Thapar made him drink water by daring to treat him like an entirely ordinary mortal back in 2007.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And, yes, we are all a bit weary of having the nichli jaat card and the tea-seller’s son card being pulled out at us on a regular basis, and we are maybe ready to stop with the attacks on minorities, women and the press, especially as these have not been balanced out with the progress we were promised.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>And, so, maybe we are ready for love.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But, this is not a Disney Princess movie, and so, ‘true love’ will not be enough. It runs the risk of being seen as soft, weak and metrosexual, and not muscular enough to do the heavy lifting required to lift India out of the morass we are currently in. The derisive retorts the BJP can trot out just write themselves (love will not create jobs, love will not defeat Pakistan etc.)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>What the country needs is ‘tough love’. Remember that Munnabhai’s jaadu ki jappis had so much impact simply because he was a bhai, and he and Circuit could back up those sweet, disarming jaapis with some pretty hard punches whenever they had to.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The Congress will have to somehow make us believe that it can deliver ‘tough love’—law enforcement, education, jobs, infrastructure, healthcare, firm governance, and smoothly functioning civic bodies, all served up with lots of inclusive, hate-the-sin-not-the-sinner love. That is the big idea that needs to be cracked and that is the only one that could successfully slay the saffron dragon. Let us just hope Rahul is the right prince for the job.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>While on the subject of love, I cannot avoid mentioning the big Romeo and Juliet-esque release of the week, Dhadak—which I have not seen yet—but, is based on the Marathi super hit Sairat, which I have. And, while I loved Sairat—so raw, and pure, and soaring and full of the frisson and headiness of first love—I did wonder what kind of message a film like Sairat (or for that matter Dhadak) leave young viewers with? Won’t the violent, hopeless endings of both films serve as a sort of Grimm, cautionary tale to young people? Ki girls and boys, look for love and marriage within your caste and class boundaries, or you could end up facing the same deathly fate that the couples in both films did.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>Chauhan is an author and advertising professional.</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/07/26/love-is-the-new-sword.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/07/26/love-is-the-new-sword.html Thu Jul 26 18:40:02 IST 2018 the-tham-luang-script <a href="http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/07/14/the-tham-luang-script.html"><img border="0" hspace="10" align="left" style="margin-top:3px;margin-right:5px;" src="http://img.theweek.in/content/dam/week/opinion/columns/anuja-chauhan/images/2018/7/14/46-the-tham-luang-script-new.jpg" /> <p>Just as the world was giving up on them, they were discovered, and soon our screens were flooded with images of the cave, the kids, and the international team of heroic divers involved in a desperate race against the rains, the treacherous terrain and depleting oxygen to rescue them. All twelve boys and their coach have been taken out, as I write this. We, of course, remained riveted to our TVs till they were all out.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>What a story. Part Dead Poets Society, part 127 hours.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>If it were to be made into a film, the script would practically write itself. It would begin with the coach giving up his life in the monastery, and deciding to return to the real world. Then it would cut to the day of the hike, establish the whole team, their strengths and weaknesses, their little rivalries, cliques and internal dynamics, and the descent into the cave. Then, the rain, the panic, the fear, the vigil, the coming together of the rag-tag group as one well-knit unit, and, finally, the rescue, spread over three nights. And a beautiful, life-affirming finale, too, with the entire Wild Boar squad in Russia, watching the world cup final along with their football idols, as the honoured guests of FIFA.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>But, what if it got made here in Modiji’s India? Then it would be a very different film.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>See, our new breed of film-makers, with their fancy degrees from the US and Europe, mean very well. They like making biopics and all. Besides, both ‘biopic’ and ‘cinematic retelling’ have a vaguely intellectual ring to them—they make both studios and audiences feel smarter. But, unfortunately, our film-makers also believe, very firmly, that the ‘masses’ like black and white characters, pretty girls, and a massively satisfying climax.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>So, they pick a bold subject and start off with the best of intentions and great costumes and prosthetics, and then slowly slowly, they lose their nerve and start to play around with the facts, cherry-picking and embellishing... (with one eye on what would please the current political dispensation) and that is how we end up with a campy ‘Aladdin’ who dances like a goblin and gnaws on hunks of raw meat, a ‘Rustom’ who did everything not for wife, but for country, and an innocent more-sinned-against-than-sinning ’Sanju’ who apparently never got married at all till he met his (third) wife at the age of 49.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Let’s face it, if we made a biopic on the Wild Boars rescue, the kids would probably belong to an RSS shakha, the caves would have caved in not because of the monsoon but because of an Islamic terror bombing, the coach would have a buxom lass as his love interest and an item number would be show-horned in before the climax, featuring the villain capering around with said buxom lass. (Aaja gufaaon mein, aaja gunha kar le, anyone?)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Fact is fiction basically. And, ‘history’ is history. Only histrionics rule.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><b>editor@theweek.in</b></p> http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/07/14/the-tham-luang-script.html http://www.theweek.in/columns/anuja-chauhan/2018/07/14/the-tham-luang-script.html Sat Jul 14 14:01:54 IST 2018